Skip to main content

How Do Real Cybercrime Syndicates Operate?: The Case of Online Romance Fraud Syndicates

Francis Kofi Andoh-Baidoo ; Martin Otu Offei ; Emmanuel W. Ayaburi ; Mikko Siponen ; Pavel Gladyshev (2024) — IEEE Security & Privacy

View Original Source (opens in a new tab)

DOI: 10.1109/msec.2024.3401288 (opens in a new tab)

Type:   Journal Article
Country:   United States
Tags:   AI Enabled Deception, AI-Enabled Fraud, Cybercrime Syndicates, Money Laundering, Money Mules, Offender Organization, Online Dating Platforms, Prevention, Romance Scams
What do these research terms mean?
Preprint
A manuscript shared before formal peer review and publication. Check whether a later published version is available.
Dataset
A collection of data or examples for others to inspect or reuse. It can appear in Library search and topic mapping, but RSRC does not use dataset records as evidence in Research Insights.
Dissertation or thesis
Research submitted for an academic degree. This describes its format, not its reliability.
Journal article
An article published in a journal. This label alone does not establish peer review, study quality, or how well the findings apply elsewhere.
Qualitative research
Examines experiences, meanings, or processes, often through interviews or observations. It can explain how something happens without estimating how common it is.
Quantitative research
Uses numerical measurements to describe patterns or test relationships. A relationship between two measurements does not by itself show that one causes the other.
Systematic review
Uses a planned, documented method to find and assess research addressing a question. Its conclusions still depend on the included studies and what the search covered.
Meta-analysis
Statistically combines results from multiple studies. Combining studies does not remove weaknesses in their design or make unlike populations interchangeable.
Not classified
This record has no recognized label in this filter. It does not mean the publication used no method, or that no research exists.

Definitions draw on DataCite resource types; Cochrane review methods; NLM: association and causation. RSRC’s dataset and classification rules are explained in our methodology.

Citation tools
Download RIS Download BibTeX 


              
              

            

          

        


      

      

    

        
Transparency

        
Evidence and review status

        
This page contains AI-generated content. No human content review or subject-matter-expert review is recorded.

    


    

                    

                
Source basis

                

                    Downloaded PDF
                

            

                    

                
Source updates

                

                    No notice found at last check
                

            

                    

                
AI-generated page content

                

                    Yes
                

            

                    

                
Automated checks

                

                    Passed
                

            

                    

                
Administrative approval

                

                    Yes
                

            

                    

                
Human content review

                

                    Not recorded
                

            

                    

                
Subject-matter-expert review

                

                    Not recorded
                

            

            


    

        
            How this was prepared
        
        

                            

                    
Source basis

                    

                    
RSRC downloaded and privately stored a copy of the paper for internal analysis. The PDF is not offered to viewers from this page.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    PDF added to RSRC:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Source updates

                    

                    
No incoming update notice was found in the dated Crossref response. Coverage is incomplete, particularly for corrections and expressions of concern; this is not a guarantee that the source is valid or unchanged.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Last source-status attempt:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
AI-generated page content

                    

                    
AI-generated research notes displayed on this page: Synopsis, Identified gaps, Methods, Limitations, Future work. The paper itself is not described as AI-generated.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Document analysis recorded:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                            
  • 
                                    Page record updated:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Automated checks

                    

                    
The current, source-bound synopsis passed the recorded versioned publication checks.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Checks completed:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                            

                            
                                View passed checks (3)
                            
                            
    
                                                                    
  • Length, completeness, repetition, refusal, boilerplate, and active-markup screening
    • 
                                                                    
  • Numerical claims checked against the available source text
    • 
                                                                    
  • English-source lexical grounding check
    • 
                                                            

                        

                                        

                

                            

                    
Administrative approval

                    

                    
The record is approved for public display, but a complete historical administrator action is not recorded.


                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Human content review

                    

                    
No human review is recorded for the AI-generated content displayed on this page.


                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Subject-matter-expert review

                    

                    
RSRC has not recorded review of this content by a subject-matter or methods expert.


                    
                                        

                

                    

    


    

        Review-state definitions

        Found a possible error?
        Request a correction.
    



    



              

        
                  

            
Synopsis

            
Catalog entry: Online romance frauds originating from Africa are described as organized activities conducted by syndicates typically comprising 150 to 200 individual scammers. The material outlines a multi-tiered network in which tasks are distributed across three levels. At the base, operational level actors carry out direct fraudulent communications and manipulation of targets. These actors are overseen by “chairmen,” whose responsibilities include coordinating activity, enforcing discipline, and reporting performance to higher leadership. Above them sits the “chairman of chairmen,” a supervisory tier that aggregates reports and sets strategic direction for the network. The arrangement is presented as a formal ladder, with information and material resources flowing upward through defined channels. The description notes that the precise structure can vary and that roles may be adapted to fit operational demands. A secondary dimension concerns sympathizers and peripheral actors whose actions or inactions may unintentionally support the fraud ecosystem. Their involvement can take the form of passive engagement, social sharing, or failure to report suspicious activity. The overview highlights the potential influence of non-operational participants on the persistence of fraudulent schemes, without attributing intent to the sympathizers. The entry situates these factors within a broader context of online deception, emphasizing descriptive characterization rather than prescriptive guidance. Overall, the catalog presents a concise, neutral account of organizational dynamics and social interactions that can accompany online romance frauds associated with this regional context.

          

        
                  

            
Identified Gaps

            
The article argues that prevention requires a deeper understanding of local crime settings and the roles of all syndicate participants and sympathizers. It identifies a practical gap between measures such as arresting local money mules or increasing bank security and effective prevention, because offenders adapt by shifting to online payment systems. It does not provide empirical evaluation of the proposed interventions.

          

        
                  

            
Methods

            
This is a descriptive case-oriented account of online romance-fraud syndicates. It presents a three-level gang hierarchy, participant roles, recruitment and training practices, operational stages, proceeds sharing, laundering, and prevention recommendations. The supplied text does not report data sources, sampling, participant numbers, fieldwork procedures, or analytic methods, so the evidentiary basis for the account cannot be assessed from this publication text.

          

        
                  

            
Limitations

            
No formal research design, data collection procedure, sample, analytic approach, or source attribution for the article's central organizational claims is reported in the supplied text. Several claims are framed broadly around sub-Saharan Africa and African scammers, while the scope and representativeness of the case evidence remain unspecified. The recommendations are not empirically evaluated.

          

        
                  

            
Future Work

            
Future work should develop and assess employment and IT-skills pathways for young people, strengthen bank controls against laundering, improve dating-platform detection and reporting of syndicates, equip law enforcement to prosecute participants, and test reintegration mechanisms for first offenders. The article also calls for international cooperation among enforcement, education, government, and nongovernmental stakeholders.

          

              

    
    

        
Related Research Insights

        

            See how this publication connects to RSRC's living evidence syntheses through current citations and research-topic mapping.