Skip to main content

Reality Counseling Approach to Increasing Career Woman Awareness (Case Study Love Scam)

Nakhma'ussolikhah ; Iman Subasman ; Lina Marliani (2025) — International Journal of Education and Humanities

View Original Source (opens in a new tab)

DOI: 10.58557/(ijeh).v5i2.313 (opens in a new tab)

Type:   Journal Article
Country:   Indonesia
Tags:   AI-Enabled Fraud, Career Women, Financial Loss, Indonesia, Love Scam, Older Adults, Psychological Trauma, Reality Counseling, Romance Scams, Social Media
What do these research terms mean?
Preprint
A manuscript shared before formal peer review and publication. Check whether a later published version is available.
Dataset
A collection of data or examples for others to inspect or reuse. It can appear in Library search and topic mapping, but RSRC does not use dataset records as evidence in Research Insights.
Dissertation or thesis
Research submitted for an academic degree. This describes its format, not its reliability.
Journal article
An article published in a journal. This label alone does not establish peer review, study quality, or how well the findings apply elsewhere.
Qualitative research
Examines experiences, meanings, or processes, often through interviews or observations. It can explain how something happens without estimating how common it is.
Quantitative research
Uses numerical measurements to describe patterns or test relationships. A relationship between two measurements does not by itself show that one causes the other.
Systematic review
Uses a planned, documented method to find and assess research addressing a question. Its conclusions still depend on the included studies and what the search covered.
Meta-analysis
Statistically combines results from multiple studies. Combining studies does not remove weaknesses in their design or make unlike populations interchangeable.
Not classified
This record has no recognized label in this filter. It does not mean the publication used no method, or that no research exists.

Definitions draw on DataCite resource types; Cochrane review methods; NLM: association and causation. RSRC’s dataset and classification rules are explained in our methodology.

Citation tools
Download RIS Download BibTeX 


              
              

            

          

        


      

      

    

        
Transparency

        
Evidence and review status

        
This page contains AI-generated content. No human content review or subject-matter-expert review is recorded.

    


    

                    

                
Source basis

                

                    Downloaded PDF
                

            

                    

                
Source updates

                

                    No notice found at last check
                

            

                    

                
AI-generated page content

                

                    Yes
                

            

                    

                
Automated checks

                

                    Passed
                

            

                    

                
Administrative approval

                

                    Yes
                

            

                    

                
Human content review

                

                    Not recorded
                

            

                    

                
Subject-matter-expert review

                

                    Not recorded
                

            

            


    

        
            How this was prepared
        
        

                            

                    
Source basis

                    

                    
RSRC downloaded and privately stored a copy of the paper for internal analysis. The PDF is not offered to viewers from this page.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    PDF added to RSRC:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Source updates

                    

                    
No incoming update notice was found in the dated Crossref response. Coverage is incomplete, particularly for corrections and expressions of concern; this is not a guarantee that the source is valid or unchanged.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Last source-status attempt:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
AI-generated page content

                    

                    
AI-generated research notes displayed on this page: Synopsis, Identified gaps, Methods, Limitations, Future work. The paper itself is not described as AI-generated.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Document analysis recorded:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                            
  • 
                                    Page record updated:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Automated checks

                    

                    
The current, source-bound synopsis passed the recorded versioned publication checks.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Checks completed:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                            

                            
                                View passed checks (3)
                            
                            
    
                                                                    
  • Length, completeness, repetition, refusal, boilerplate, and active-markup screening
    • 
                                                                    
  • Numerical claims checked against the available source text
    • 
                                                                    
  • English-source lexical grounding check
    • 
                                                            

                        

                                        

                

                            

                    
Administrative approval

                    

                    
The record is approved for public display, but a complete historical administrator action is not recorded.


                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Human content review

                    

                    
No human review is recorded for the AI-generated content displayed on this page.


                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Subject-matter-expert review

                    

                    
RSRC has not recorded review of this content by a subject-matter or methods expert.


                    
                                        

                

                    

    


    

        Review-state definitions

        Found a possible error?
        Request a correction.
    



    



              

        
                  

            
Synopsis

            
This localized qualitative case study examined three career women aged 30, 32, and 34 in Cirebon, Indonesia, who experienced love-scam trauma and financial loss. It combined longitudinal observation, in-depth interviews, and transaction, counseling, and legal records with perspectives from legal, economic, and counseling professionals. The thematic analysis followed identity fabrication, intensive trust building, urgent financial requests, psychological and financial effects, and recovery; reality counseling was used to support awareness and coping. The design provides detailed accounts of a small set of cases but does not establish that counseling caused recovery. Three participants from one city, no comparison group, and no standardized outcome measures sharply limit generalization and effectiveness claims.

          

        
                  

            
Identified Gaps

            
Evidence is limited on how reality counseling works across a broader range of love-scam victims and on its measurable effects on financial recovery. The paper examines only three career women in one locality, while its discussion describes varied psychological, legal, economic, and platform-related needs. Broader evidence is needed on victims beyond career women and on longer-term recovery.

          

        
                  

            
Methods

            
Qualitative single-case study in Cirebon, Indonesia. The study involved three career women aged 30, 32, and 34 who experienced love-scam-related trauma and financial loss, plus a legal expert, entrepreneur/economist, and counselor. Researchers used longitudinal observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation including transaction, counseling, and legal records. Data were coded around psychological impact, financial loss, and recovery strategies; source triangulation and thematic analysis compared victim and expert perspectives. Reality counseling was used to support awareness and recovery.

          

        
                  

            
Limitations

            
The study is a localized single-case qualitative design involving only three primary participants, all career women aged 30–34 in Cirebon. Findings rely on observations, interviews, documentation, and source triangulation rather than reported standardized outcome measures or comparison groups. Consequently, conclusions about counseling effectiveness and applicability to other victims should be interpreted cautiously.

          

        
                  

            
Future Work

            
Future research should evaluate reality counseling with larger and more diverse victim samples, compare outcomes over time, and assess financial recovery separately from psychological awareness. This is a cautious inference from the single Cirebon case design, three participants, and the study’s stated aim to assess counseling effectiveness.

          

              

    
    

        
Related Research Insights

        

            See how this publication connects to RSRC's living evidence syntheses through current citations and research-topic mapping.