Skip to main content

Waspada Cinta Maya: Membangun Kesadaran Bahaya Online Love Scam Masyarakat Desa 'Damai' Nglinggi, Kabupaten Klaten

Pramana Pramana ; Chairunnisa Widya Priastuty ; Prahastiwi Utari (2024) — Dharma Sevanam : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat

Country:   Indonesia
What do these research terms mean?
Preprint
A manuscript shared before formal peer review and publication. Check whether a later published version is available.
Dataset
A collection of data or examples for others to inspect or reuse. It can appear in Library search and topic mapping, but RSRC does not use dataset records as evidence in Research Insights.
Dissertation or thesis
Research submitted for an academic degree. This describes its format, not its reliability.
Journal article
An article published in a journal. This label alone does not establish peer review, study quality, or how well the findings apply elsewhere.
Qualitative research
Examines experiences, meanings, or processes, often through interviews or observations. It can explain how something happens without estimating how common it is.
Quantitative research
Uses numerical measurements to describe patterns or test relationships. A relationship between two measurements does not by itself show that one causes the other.
Systematic review
Uses a planned, documented method to find and assess research addressing a question. Its conclusions still depend on the included studies and what the search covered.
Meta-analysis
Statistically combines results from multiple studies. Combining studies does not remove weaknesses in their design or make unlike populations interchangeable.
Not classified
This record has no recognized label in this filter. It does not mean the publication used no method, or that no research exists.

Definitions draw on DataCite resource types; Cochrane review methods; NLM: association and causation. RSRC’s dataset and classification rules are explained in our methodology.

Citation tools


              
              

Transparency

Evidence and review status

This page contains AI-generated content. Human review is recorded for the synopsis only; no human review is recorded for the other AI research notes, and no subject-matter-expert review is recorded.

Source basis
Downloaded PDF
Source updates
No notice found at last check
AI-generated page content
Yes
Automated checks
Editor override
Administrative approval
Yes
Human content review
Synopsis only
Subject-matter-expert review
Not recorded
How this was prepared
Source basis

RSRC downloaded and privately stored a copy of the paper for internal analysis. The PDF is not offered to viewers from this page.

  • PDF added to RSRC:
Source updates

No incoming update notice was found in the dated Crossref response. Coverage is incomplete, particularly for corrections and expressions of concern; this is not a guarantee that the source is valid or unchanged.

  • Last source-status attempt:
AI-generated page content

AI-generated research notes displayed on this page: Synopsis, Identified gaps, Methods, Limitations, Future work. The paper itself is not described as AI-generated.

  • Document analysis recorded:
  • Page record updated:
Automated checks

The automated gate raised issues. An authenticated editor approved this exact synopsis for display.

  • Automated check recorded:
  • Editor decision recorded:
View issues reviewed (1)
  • The source does not appear to be English, so lexical source matching requires editorial review.
Administrative approval

The record is approved for public display, but a complete historical administrator action is not recorded.

Human content review

An authenticated editor reviewed the displayed synopsis. No human review is recorded for the other AI-generated research notes.

  • Human review recorded:
Subject-matter-expert review

RSRC has not recorded review of this content by a subject-matter or methods expert.

Review-state definitions
Found a possible error? Request a correction.

Synopsis

The digital era offers clear conveniences but can also lead people astray if reading and interpretive skills are not sufficiently developed. Against this backdrop, a community outreach effort centered on social interaction in Nglinggi Village is framed as a modest but purposeful step toward improving literacy, with a particular focus on digital literacy related to media ethics and recognizing online love scams. Such scams are increasingly common and tend to confuse both those who perpetrate them and those who become victims, highlighting the need for critical understanding in online encounters. The initiative aims to translate awareness into practical understanding, linking everyday digital behavior with ethical considerations and protective practices. The article presents knowledge sharing and ongoing dialogue as essential mechanisms for broadening access to information. The transmission of insights and the presence of continuous debate function as effective means for people to connect and to enhance collective knowledge. The climate of conversation, fostered by the committed involvement of local residents, indicates sustained interest and focus on the issue. By observing existing problems and following the trajectories of discussions with field experts, the study points toward digital literacy as a topic worthy of wider attention and suggests it should inform future programming and guidance. From these observations, the findings propose that digital literacy ought to become a shared priority and be incorporated into a layered educational framework. The goal is to deepen understanding and promote more optimal and positive use of the internet, ensuring that ethical considerations and practical competencies accompany digital navigation. Integrating digital literacy into the broader education curriculum would align local concerns with overarching educational aims, supporting residents in engaging with online spaces with greater confidence and responsibility.

Identified Gaps

Participants reportedly knew about cybercrime risks but did not understand prevention, warning signs, or appropriate assistance for online love-scam victims. The paper also suggests that education should extend beyond cities to villages and across age groups, where internet use is expanding. It does not provide a systematic assessment of these needs or of intervention outcomes.

Methods

This community-service project delivered a participatory, empowerment-oriented awareness session in Nglinggi Village on 19 June 2023. Initial direct observation and information from village government were used to understand the target setting. Forty representatives of village institutions attended a three-hour talk-show-style session, including presentations on social-media ethics and online love-scam risks, prevention, and victim assistance, plus discussion, questions, and activities. Evaluation relied on observation and activity documentation.

Limitations

The project reports acceptance of materials based on observation and documentation, without pre/post measures, a comparison group, follow-up, or a systematic account of participant-level outcomes. The sample consisted of 40 village-institution representatives rather than the whole community, so claims about broader awareness or preventive effects should be treated cautiously.

Future Work

Integrate digital literacy into staged educational curricula from primary school through higher education, so internet use across communities becomes wiser, more beneficial, and less harmful.

See how this publication connects to RSRC's living evidence syntheses through current citations and research-topic mapping.