Skip to main content

Do You Love Me? Psychological Characteristics of Romance Scam Victims

Monica T. Whitty (2017) — Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking

What do these research terms mean?
Preprint
A manuscript shared before formal peer review and publication. Check whether a later published version is available.
Dataset
A collection of data or examples for others to inspect or reuse. It can appear in Library search and topic mapping, but RSRC does not use dataset records as evidence in Research Insights.
Dissertation or thesis
Research submitted for an academic degree. This describes its format, not its reliability.
Journal article
An article published in a journal. This label alone does not establish peer review, study quality, or how well the findings apply elsewhere.
Qualitative research
Examines experiences, meanings, or processes, often through interviews or observations. It can explain how something happens without estimating how common it is.
Quantitative research
Uses numerical measurements to describe patterns or test relationships. A relationship between two measurements does not by itself show that one causes the other.
Systematic review
Uses a planned, documented method to find and assess research addressing a question. Its conclusions still depend on the included studies and what the search covered.
Meta-analysis
Statistically combines results from multiple studies. Combining studies does not remove weaknesses in their design or make unlike populations interchangeable.
Not classified
This record has no recognized label in this filter. It does not mean the publication used no method, or that no research exists.

Definitions draw on DataCite resource types; Cochrane review methods; NLM: association and causation. RSRC’s dataset and classification rules are explained in our methodology.

Citation tools


              
              

Transparency

Evidence and review status

This page contains AI-generated content. No human content review or subject-matter-expert review is recorded.

Source basis
Downloaded PDF
Source updates
No notice found at last check
AI-generated page content
Yes
Automated checks
Passed
Administrative approval
Yes
Human content review
Not recorded
Subject-matter-expert review
Not recorded
How this was prepared
Source basis

RSRC downloaded and privately stored a copy of the paper for internal analysis. The PDF is not offered to viewers from this page.

  • PDF added to RSRC:
Source updates

No incoming update notice was found in the dated Crossref response. Coverage is incomplete, particularly for corrections and expressions of concern; this is not a guarantee that the source is valid or unchanged.

  • Last source-status attempt:
AI-generated page content

AI-generated research notes displayed on this page: Synopsis, Identified gaps, Methods, Limitations, Future work. The paper itself is not described as AI-generated.

  • Document analysis recorded:
  • Page record updated:
Automated checks

The current, source-bound synopsis passed the recorded versioned publication checks.

  • Checks completed:
View passed checks (3)
  • Length, completeness, repetition, refusal, boilerplate, and active-markup screening
  • Numerical claims checked against the available source text
  • English-source lexical grounding check
Administrative approval

The record is approved for public display, but a complete historical administrator action is not recorded.

Human content review

No human review is recorded for the AI-generated content displayed on this page.

Subject-matter-expert review

RSRC has not recorded review of this content by a subject-matter or methods expert.

Review-state definitions
Found a possible error? Request a correction.

Synopsis

This U.K. Qualtrics-panel questionnaire study compared 200 self-identified romance-scam victims with respondents who reported never being scammed by any mass-marketing fraud. A logistic regression tested demographic, personality, trust, impulsivity, addictive-disposition, and cybersecurity-knowledge measures. Higher urgency, sensation seeking, addictive disposition, and education were associated with victimhood, while lower self-rated kindness and trustworthiness were also associated. In the victim sample, 60% were women and 63% were middle-aged. These are group-level associations, not a reliable profile for identifying individual victims. The cross-sectional design, online-panel recruitment, and self-reported scam and psychological measures cannot establish whether the measured characteristics preceded victimization or generalize to people outside the panel.

Identified Gaps

The paper identifies a paucity of MMF victimology research and little prior knowledge about whether education and kindness distinguish victims from nonvictims. It also notes unresolved explanations for the counterintuitive findings that higher education and lower kindness predicted romance-scam victimhood.

Methods

UK Qualtrics-panel questionnaire study. The final sample included 200 romance-scam victims and a comparison group never scammed by any MMF. Participants completed demographic items and measures of impulsivity, locus of control, trust, trustworthiness, kindness, greed, addictive disposition, and self-rated cybersecurity knowledge. Forced-entry binary logistic regression tested predictors of romance-scam victimhood.

Limitations

The study used an online panel, self-reported scam experience, and self-report psychological measures, so findings may not fully generalize beyond panel respondents or establish whether traits preceded victimization. The design compares victims with people never scammed by any MMF, and the paper presents speculative rather than tested explanations for the education and kindness findings.

Future Work

Test explanations for the education finding, including dating-site use and overconfidence in detecting scams. Clarify why lower kindness is associated with victimhood, including whether isolation, reduced social networks, or post-scam effects contribute. Evaluate targeted awareness and prevention programs, including addiction-informed approaches to prevent revictimization.

See how this publication connects to RSRC's living evidence syntheses through current citations and research-topic mapping.