Skip to main content

Analyzing the Evolving Modus Operandi of Romance Scams via Court Judgments: Crime Script and Policy Implications

Hyejin Lee ; Minseo Boo (2025) — KOREAN CRIMINOLOGICAL REVIEW

Citation activity

Total citations · Google Scholar
Unavailable
Average per calendar year
Citation count unavailable

Counts reflect Google Scholar’s coverage and do not measure research quality. Source, calculation and limitations

View Original Source (opens in a new tab)

DOI: 10.36889/kcr.2025.12.31.4.131 (opens in a new tab)

Type:   Journal Article
Country:   South Korea
Tags:   Court Judgment Analysis, Court Judgments, Crime Script, Crime Scripts, Cryptocurrency, Cryptocurrency Laundering, Money Laundering, Organized Crime, Prevention, Romance Scams, South Korea, Victim Offender Overlap
What do these research terms mean?
Preprint
A manuscript shared before formal peer review and publication. Check whether a later published version is available.
Dataset
A collection of data or examples for others to inspect or reuse. It can appear in Library search and topic mapping, but RSRC does not use dataset records as evidence in Research Insights.
Dissertation or thesis
Research submitted for an academic degree. This describes its format, not its reliability.
Journal article
An article published in a journal. This label alone does not establish peer review, study quality, or how well the findings apply elsewhere.
Qualitative research
Examines experiences, meanings, or processes, often through interviews or observations. It can explain how something happens without estimating how common it is.
Quantitative research
Uses numerical measurements to describe patterns or test relationships. A relationship between two measurements does not by itself show that one causes the other.
Systematic review
Uses a planned, documented method to find and assess research addressing a question. Its conclusions still depend on the included studies and what the search covered.
Meta-analysis
Statistically combines results from multiple studies. Combining studies does not remove weaknesses in their design or make unlike populations interchangeable.
Not classified
This record has no recognized label in this filter. It does not mean the publication used no method, or that no research exists.

Definitions draw on DataCite resource types; Cochrane review methods; NLM: association and causation. RSRC’s dataset and classification rules are explained in our methodology.

Citation tools
Download RIS Download BibTeX 


              
              

            

          

        


      

      

    

        
Transparency

        
Evidence and review status

        
This page contains AI-generated content. No human content review or subject-matter-expert review is recorded.

    


    

                    

                
Source basis

                

                    Downloaded PDF
                

            

                    

                
Source updates

                

                    No notice found at last check
                

            

                    

                
AI-generated page content

                

                    Yes
                

            

                    

                
Automated checks

                

                    Passed
                

            

                    

                
Administrative approval

                

                    Yes
                

            

                    

                
Human content review

                

                    Not recorded
                

            

                    

                
Subject-matter-expert review

                

                    Not recorded
                

            

            


    

        
            How this was prepared
        
        

                            

                    
Source basis

                    

                    
RSRC downloaded and privately stored a copy of the paper for internal analysis. The PDF is not offered to viewers from this page.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    PDF added to RSRC:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Source updates

                    

                    
No incoming update notice was found in the dated Crossref response. Coverage is incomplete, particularly for corrections and expressions of concern; this is not a guarantee that the source is valid or unchanged.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Last source-status attempt:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
AI-generated page content

                    

                    
AI-generated research notes displayed on this page: Synopsis, Identified gaps, Methods, Limitations, Future work. The paper itself is not described as AI-generated.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Document analysis recorded:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                            
  • 
                                    Page record updated:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Automated checks

                    

                    
The current, source-bound synopsis passed the recorded versioned publication checks.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Checks completed:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                            

                            
                                View passed checks (2)
                            
                            
    
                                                                    
  • Length, completeness, repetition, refusal, boilerplate, and active-markup screening
    • 
                                                                    
  • Numerical claims checked against the available source text
    • 
                                                            

                        

                                        

                

                            

                    
Administrative approval

                    

                    
An authenticated administrator approved the bibliographic record for public Library display. This is not a review of every research claim.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Approved for public display:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Human content review

                    

                    
No human review is recorded for the AI-generated content displayed on this page.


                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Subject-matter-expert review

                    

                    
RSRC has not recorded review of this content by a subject-matter or methods expert.


                    
                                        

                

                    

    


    

        Review-state definitions

        Found a possible error?
        Request a correction.
    



    



              

        
                  

            
Synopsis

            
The study qualitatively analyzed 96 South Korean criminal judgments concerning romance scams, sentenced from January 2024 to September 2025 and retrieved through LBOX. Two coders developed and applied a coding sheet, independently coded judgments, and resolved discrepancies through document review and discussion. Romance scams followed a sequential script comprising organizational formation, organizational operation, target selection and relationship building, fund solicitation and extraction, transfer of victim funds, proceeds distribution, and investigation evasion. The cases displayed organized-crime characteristics through systematic division of roles among participants. The study is not a census of all romance-scam cases; it sampled judgments from a defined period, limiting generalizability.

          

        
                  

            
Identified Gaps

            
Earlier studies emphasized scam scripts, scenario types, psychological mechanisms, and linguistic persuasion, but had not adequately analyzed recent changes such as virtual-asset use, investment-fraud convergence, organized-crime features, or victim–offender overlap. The authors further note that existing victim–offender-overlap theory does not fully explain all observed overlap cases.

          

        
                  

            
Methods

            
The study qualitatively analyzed 96 South Korean criminal judgments concerning romance scams, sentenced from January 2024 to September 2025 and retrieved through LBOX. Two coders developed and applied a coding sheet, independently coded judgments, and resolved discrepancies through document review and discussion. Frequency-based descriptive statistics were used after categorization. Findings were synthesized into a crime script covering organizational formation and operation, target selection/relationship building, fund solicitation/extraction, fund transfer, proceeds distribution, and investigation evasion.

          

        
                  

            
Limitations

            
The study is not a census of all romance-scam cases; it sampled judgments from a defined period, limiting generalizability. Findings are restricted to defendants’ statements and information revealed during investigation and recorded in judgments, which may differ from actual offending processes. Because arrested defendants were mainly lower-level money-transfer, recruitment/contact, or cash-withdrawal operatives, the study could obtain limited detail on leaders and managers.

          

        
                  

            
Future Work

            
Conduct detailed examination of legal and policy responses based on the identified crime stages and characteristics; analyze victim characteristics; and compare victim–offender-overlap cases with ordinary cases to develop differentiated responses. The discussion also calls for continued research because scam methods are changing.

          

              

    
    

        
Related Research Insights

        

            See how this publication connects to RSRC's living evidence syntheses through current citations and research-topic mapping.