Skip to main content

Media Presentation of Online Romance Fraud in the Czech Republic: Visibility, Victim-Offender Framing, and Sentiment

Abubakari, Yushawu (2026) — European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research

What do these research terms mean?
Preprint
A manuscript shared before formal peer review and publication. Check whether a later published version is available.
Dataset
A collection of data or examples for others to inspect or reuse. It can appear in Library search and topic mapping, but RSRC does not use dataset records as evidence in Research Insights.
Dissertation or thesis
Research submitted for an academic degree. This describes its format, not its reliability.
Journal article
An article published in a journal. This label alone does not establish peer review, study quality, or how well the findings apply elsewhere.
Qualitative research
Examines experiences, meanings, or processes, often through interviews or observations. It can explain how something happens without estimating how common it is.
Quantitative research
Uses numerical measurements to describe patterns or test relationships. A relationship between two measurements does not by itself show that one causes the other.
Systematic review
Uses a planned, documented method to find and assess research addressing a question. Its conclusions still depend on the included studies and what the search covered.
Meta-analysis
Statistically combines results from multiple studies. Combining studies does not remove weaknesses in their design or make unlike populations interchangeable.
Not classified
This record has no recognized label in this filter. It does not mean the publication used no method, or that no research exists.

Definitions draw on DataCite resource types; Cochrane review methods; NLM: association and causation. RSRC’s dataset and classification rules are explained in our methodology.

Citation tools


              
              

Transparency

Evidence and review status

This page contains AI-generated content. No human content review or subject-matter-expert review is recorded.

Source basis
Downloaded PDF
Source updates
No notice found at last check
AI-generated page content
Yes
Automated checks
Passed
Administrative approval
Yes
Human content review
Not recorded
Subject-matter-expert review
Not recorded
How this was prepared
Source basis

RSRC downloaded and privately stored a copy of the paper for internal analysis. The PDF is not offered to viewers from this page.

  • PDF added to RSRC:
Source updates

No incoming update notice was found in the dated Crossref response. Coverage is incomplete, particularly for corrections and expressions of concern; this is not a guarantee that the source is valid or unchanged.

  • Last source-status attempt:
AI-generated page content

AI-generated research notes displayed on this page: Synopsis, Identified gaps, Methods, Limitations, Future work. The paper itself is not described as AI-generated.

  • Document analysis recorded:
  • Page record updated:
Automated checks

The current, source-bound synopsis passed the recorded versioned publication checks.

  • Checks completed:
View passed checks (3)
  • Length, completeness, repetition, refusal, boilerplate, and active-markup screening
  • Numerical claims checked against the available source text
  • English-source lexical grounding check
Administrative approval

An authenticated administrator approved the bibliographic record for public Library display. This is not a review of every research claim.

  • Approved for public display:
Human content review

No human review is recorded for the AI-generated content displayed on this page.

Subject-matter-expert review

RSRC has not recorded review of this content by a subject-matter or methods expert.

Review-state definitions
Found a possible error? Request a correction.

Synopsis

This study used relational quantitative content analysis to examine how online romance fraud is presented across major Czech news outlets, public-service media, blogs, and English-language Czech coverage. The corpus was collected with Czech and English search terms, processed with web-collection and translation tools, and anchored to official cases and police communications. Psychological harm was the most visible victim frame, appearing about 160 times per 1,000 sentences versus about 120 for financial harm; both harms co-occurred strongly with negative sentiment. Fabricated crises or urgency, impersonation, and love-bombing were the most visible offender tactics, while support-seeking had a moderate association with positive sentiment. Event-driven media selection, official-source influence, translation, and interpretive coding prevent causal or population-level conclusions.

Identified Gaps

The study identifies a lack of empirical research on ORF in Central Europe, especially the Czech Republic, and a need to systematically analyze media representations, visibility, framing of victims and offenders, and sentiment over time. It notes gaps in understanding regional narratives, mechanisms, and societal impacts, calling for broader, policy-relevant analysis beyond incident reporting.

Methods

The study uses Relational Quantitative Content Analysis (RQCA) of Czech media on ORF. It builds a corpus from major outlets (iDNES.cz, Česká televize, Novinky.cz, Seznam Zprávy, Český rozhlas, Blesk.cz, Expats.cz) and blogs, using Czech/English keywords. Data were collected with Immersive Translate and analyzed via MAXQDA Web Collector to map co-occurrences among concepts (victimization, offending, sentiment, policy framing) anchored to official cases, treating police communications as part of the ORF communication environment.

Limitations

Limitations include reliance on publicly available media sources, which may reflect episodic, event-driven reporting and institutional agendas. Translation and coding subjectivity may affect sentiment and framing inferences. The study cannot establish causality or generalize beyond the Czech media landscape, and police/public communications may bias the corpus toward official narratives. Victim/offender perspectives are largely absent.

Future Work

Key future research directions include: systematically investigating the emergence, prevalence, mechanisms, and societal impacts of online romance fraud (ORF) in Central Europe and in the Czech Republic; conducting cross-country comparative framing studies; implementing longitudinal monitoring to distinguish episodic versus continuous media coverage; linking media framing to policy, prevention, and victim-support strategies; triangulating media representations with police and court data to assess accuracy and consequences; expanding cross-platform analyses to include social media and blogs alongside traditional outlets; and refining Relational Quantitative Content Analysis (RQCA) methods for cybercrime contexts.

See how this publication connects to RSRC's living evidence syntheses through current citations and research-topic mapping.