Skip to main content

Romance Fraud: Its Repercussions on Victims’ Wellbeing

Christine Gauci ; Mary Grace Vella (2025) — Women & Criminal Justice

Citation activity

Total citations · Google Scholar
2
Average per calendar year
1.0

Count checked .

2 citations ÷ 2 calendar years (2025–2026). The first and last years may be partial. This is a lifetime average, not a year-by-year citation history.

Counts reflect Google Scholar’s coverage and do not measure research quality. Source, calculation and limitations

What do these research terms mean?
Preprint
A manuscript shared before formal peer review and publication. Check whether a later published version is available.
Dataset
A collection of data or examples for others to inspect or reuse. It can appear in Library search and topic mapping, but RSRC does not use dataset records as evidence in Research Insights.
Dissertation or thesis
Research submitted for an academic degree. This describes its format, not its reliability.
Journal article
An article published in a journal. This label alone does not establish peer review, study quality, or how well the findings apply elsewhere.
Qualitative research
Examines experiences, meanings, or processes, often through interviews or observations. It can explain how something happens without estimating how common it is.
Quantitative research
Uses numerical measurements to describe patterns or test relationships. A relationship between two measurements does not by itself show that one causes the other.
Systematic review
Uses a planned, documented method to find and assess research addressing a question. Its conclusions still depend on the included studies and what the search covered.
Meta-analysis
Statistically combines results from multiple studies. Combining studies does not remove weaknesses in their design or make unlike populations interchangeable.
Not classified
This record has no recognized label in this filter. It does not mean the publication used no method, or that no research exists.

Definitions draw on DataCite resource types; Cochrane review methods; NLM: association and causation. RSRC’s dataset and classification rules are explained in our methodology.

Citation tools


              
              

Transparency

Evidence and review status

This page contains AI-generated content. No human content review or subject-matter-expert review is recorded.

Source basis
Downloaded PDF
Source updates
No notice found at last check
AI-generated page content
Yes
Automated checks
Passed
Administrative approval
Yes
Human content review
Not recorded
Subject-matter-expert review
Not recorded
How this was prepared
Source basis

RSRC downloaded and privately stored a copy of the paper for internal analysis. The PDF is not offered to viewers from this page.

  • PDF added to RSRC:
Source updates

No incoming update notice was found in the dated Crossref response. Coverage is incomplete, particularly for corrections and expressions of concern; this is not a guarantee that the source is valid or unchanged.

  • Last source-status attempt:
AI-generated page content

AI-generated research notes displayed on this page: Synopsis, Identified gaps, Methods, Limitations, Future work. The paper itself is not described as AI-generated.

  • Document analysis recorded:
  • Page record updated:
Automated checks

The current, source-bound synopsis passed the recorded versioned publication checks.

  • Checks completed:
View passed checks (3)
  • Length, completeness, repetition, refusal, boilerplate, and active-markup screening
  • Numerical claims checked against the available source text
  • English-source lexical grounding check
Administrative approval

An authenticated administrator approved the bibliographic record for public Library display. This is not a review of every research claim.

  • Approved for public display:
Human content review

No human review is recorded for the AI-generated content displayed on this page.

Subject-matter-expert review

RSRC has not recorded review of this content by a subject-matter or methods expert.

Review-state definitions
Found a possible error? Request a correction.

Synopsis

This Malta-based phenomenological study examined the repercussions of online romance fraud for middle-aged women. Six women aged 40-60, recruited through the Victim Support Agency, each completed three biographic-narrative interview sessions; six professionals completed semi-structured interviews. Contextualist thematic analysis compared victim and professional accounts across psychological, social, physical, financial, justice-system, recovery, and support experiences. The repeated interviews and multidisciplinary perspectives provide depth and can identify service gaps, including the absence of a Maltese organization dedicated solely to romance-fraud victims, but they do not measure prevalence or intervention effectiveness. The small purposive women-only sample, retrospective self-report, researcher interpretation, and one national setting sharply limit generalization.

Identified Gaps

The paper identifies scarce research on romance fraud, particularly its effects on victims’ wellbeing and quality of life. It further identifies a Maltese research gap: local studies on romance fraud and its impact on victims’ wellbeing are described as scarce or absent. Local statistics are also limited because romance fraud is combined with other fraud categories, impeding pattern analysis. The study additionally aims to address theoretical and policy lacunae and improve services for romance-fraud victims.

Methods

This Malta-based qualitative, phenomenological study explored holistic consequences of online romance fraud for middle-aged women. Six female victims aged 40–60 were purposively recruited through the Victim Support Agency; six relevant professionals were recruited through snowball sampling. Victims completed audio-recorded SQUIN/biographic-narrative interviews, including three sessions per victim; professionals completed semi-structured interviews. The researcher used contextualist thematic analysis, NVivo, and a multidisciplinary comparison of victim and professional accounts. Sampling eligibility required victims to have terminated therapy two years earlier.

Limitations

The small, purposive sample of six middle-aged female victims and six professionals limits generalisability beyond this specific Maltese population and setting. Qualitative thematic analysis depends on interpretation and may lack inter-rater reliability because an additional coder is needed but may not always be available. Interview accounts may be affected by reluctance to disclose, imperfect memory, tension, social desirability, and researcher presence. The supplied text does not include the full concluding limitations section, so these limitations are drawn from the stated methodology.

Future Work

Further local research should address theoretical and policy lacunae around romance-fraud victims’ wellbeing, service provision, and victims’ experiences with Maltese courts. Broader samples beyond middle-aged women and triangulation with professional perspectives would help test whether findings apply across victim groups. These directions are supported by the study’s stated aims and its acknowledgement of scarce local research; the supplied text does not provide the dissertation’s detailed further-research recommendations.

See how this publication connects to RSRC's living evidence syntheses through current citations and research-topic mapping.