Skip to main content

The Aftermath of Technology-Mediated Scams: Strengthening Older Adults’ Efforts Toward Redress

Sam Ankenbauer ; Robin Brewer (2026) — ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction

Citation activity

Total citations · Google Scholar
Unavailable
Average per calendar year
Citation count unavailable

Counts reflect Google Scholar’s coverage and do not measure research quality. Source, calculation and limitations

View Original Source (opens in a new tab)

DOI: 10.1145/3805036 (opens in a new tab)

Type:   Journal Article
Country:   United States
Tags:   Affect, AI-Enabled Fraud, Cross Cultural, Digital Harm, Financial Fraud, Hci, Justice Seeking, Older Adults, Post Scam, Prevention, Recovery Scams, Redress, Romance Scams, Technology Mediated Scams
What do these research terms mean?
Preprint
A manuscript shared before formal peer review and publication. Check whether a later published version is available.
Dataset
A collection of data or examples for others to inspect or reuse. It can appear in Library search and topic mapping, but RSRC does not use dataset records as evidence in Research Insights.
Dissertation or thesis
Research submitted for an academic degree. This describes its format, not its reliability.
Journal article
An article published in a journal. This label alone does not establish peer review, study quality, or how well the findings apply elsewhere.
Qualitative research
Examines experiences, meanings, or processes, often through interviews or observations. It can explain how something happens without estimating how common it is.
Quantitative research
Uses numerical measurements to describe patterns or test relationships. A relationship between two measurements does not by itself show that one causes the other.
Systematic review
Uses a planned, documented method to find and assess research addressing a question. Its conclusions still depend on the included studies and what the search covered.
Meta-analysis
Statistically combines results from multiple studies. Combining studies does not remove weaknesses in their design or make unlike populations interchangeable.
Not classified
This record has no recognized label in this filter. It does not mean the publication used no method, or that no research exists.

Definitions draw on DataCite resource types; Cochrane review methods; NLM: association and causation. RSRC’s dataset and classification rules are explained in our methodology.

Citation tools
Download RIS Download BibTeX 


              
              

            

          

        


      

      

    

        
Transparency

        
Evidence and review status

        
This page contains AI-generated content. No human content review or subject-matter-expert review is recorded.

    


    

                    

                
Source basis

                

                    Downloaded PDF
                

            

                    

                
Source updates

                

                    No notice found at last check
                

            

                    

                
AI-generated page content

                

                    Yes
                

            

                    

                
Automated checks

                

                    Passed
                

            

                    

                
Administrative approval

                

                    Yes
                

            

                    

                
Human content review

                

                    Not recorded
                

            

                    

                
Subject-matter-expert review

                

                    Not recorded
                

            

            


    

        
            How this was prepared
        
        

                            

                    
Source basis

                    

                    
RSRC downloaded and privately stored a copy of the paper for internal analysis. The PDF is not offered to viewers from this page.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    PDF added to RSRC:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Source updates

                    

                    
No incoming update notice was found in the dated Crossref response. Coverage is incomplete, particularly for corrections and expressions of concern; this is not a guarantee that the source is valid or unchanged.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Last source-status attempt:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
AI-generated page content

                    

                    
AI-generated research notes displayed on this page: Synopsis, Identified gaps, Methods, Limitations, Future work. The paper itself is not described as AI-generated.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Document analysis recorded:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                            
  • 
                                    Page record updated:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Automated checks

                    

                    
The current, source-bound synopsis passed the recorded versioned publication checks.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Checks completed:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                            

                            
                                View passed checks (3)
                            
                            
    
                                                                    
  • Length, completeness, repetition, refusal, boilerplate, and active-markup screening
    • 
                                                                    
  • Numerical claims checked against the available source text
    • 
                                                                    
  • English-source lexical grounding check
    • 
                                                            

                        

                                        

                

                            

                    
Administrative approval

                    

                    
An authenticated administrator approved the bibliographic record for public Library display. This is not a review of every research claim.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Approved for public display:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Human content review

                    

                    
No human review is recorded for the AI-generated content displayed on this page.


                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Subject-matter-expert review

                    

                    
RSRC has not recorded review of this content by a subject-matter or methods expert.


                    
                                        

                

                    

    


    

        Review-state definitions

        Found a possible error?
        Request a correction.
    



    



              

        
                  

            
Synopsis

            
A U.S. multi-method qualitative study of adults aged 65+ who had endured a scam within the prior 3-4 weeks. Researchers collected a Qualtrics survey from 44 participants, conducted semi-structured interviews with 15, and obtained one-week daily diaries from 10, with optional scam-related artifacts. Participants used corporate resources more often than government resources after scams. Financial loss was the most common material impact, followed by identity theft and credit-score damage. The place-based recruitment across five neighboring Midwestern U.S. communities limits transferability; most participants were white, reflecting those communities.

          

        
                  

            
Identified Gaps

            
Prior scholarship emphasizes pre-scam prevention, awareness, literacy, risk perception, and scam-enactment mechanisms, while comparatively little is known about post-scam affective, social, and material consequences or older adults’ redress practices. Research also often collapses elder financial abuse by known people with fraud/scams by unknown parties, limiting understanding of their distinct trajectories. Existing evidence is frequently survey-based or secondary-data analysis.

          

        
                  

            
Methods

            
A U.S. multi-method qualitative study of adults aged 65+ who had endured a scam within the prior 3–4 weeks. Researchers collected a Qualtrics survey from 44 participants, conducted semi-structured interviews with 15, and obtained one-week daily diaries from 10, with optional scam-related artifacts. Interviews and diary data were thematically analyzed through an iterative hybrid inductive/deductive coding process involving two researchers.

          

        
                  

            
Limitations

            
The place-based recruitment across five neighboring Midwestern U.S. communities limits transferability; most participants were white, reflecting those communities. The follow-up sample was small (15 interviews; 10 diaries), and recruitment required recent scam endurance and willingness to disclose sensitive experiences, which may exclude people who disengaged or were reluctant to report after a scam. Diaries captured only one week of post-scam life.

          

        
                  

            
Future Work

            
Develop research, design, and intervention approaches that treat the post-scam as a sustained site of coordination, redress, and justice-seeking. The paper calls for equitable, transparent redress systems responsive to older adults’ lived realities, complementing prevention, digital-literacy, and in-scam disruption efforts.

          

              

    
    

        
Related Research Insights

        

            See how this publication connects to RSRC's living evidence syntheses through current citations and research-topic mapping.