Skip to main content

Mapping romance fraud research – a systematic review

Rasha Kassem ; Elisabeth Carter (2023) — Journal of Financial Crime

View Original Source (opens in a new tab)

DOI: 10.1108/jfc-06-2023-0160 (opens in a new tab)

Type:   Journal Article
Country:   United Kingdom
Tags:   AI-Enabled Fraud, Grooming, Offender Tactics, Platform Policy, Prevention, Psychology, Romance Scams, Systematic Review, Victim Experience, Victim Impacts, Victim Support
What do these research terms mean?
Preprint
A manuscript shared before formal peer review and publication. Check whether a later published version is available.
Dataset
A collection of data or examples for others to inspect or reuse. It can appear in Library search and topic mapping, but RSRC does not use dataset records as evidence in Research Insights.
Dissertation or thesis
Research submitted for an academic degree. This describes its format, not its reliability.
Journal article
An article published in a journal. This label alone does not establish peer review, study quality, or how well the findings apply elsewhere.
Qualitative research
Examines experiences, meanings, or processes, often through interviews or observations. It can explain how something happens without estimating how common it is.
Quantitative research
Uses numerical measurements to describe patterns or test relationships. A relationship between two measurements does not by itself show that one causes the other.
Systematic review
Uses a planned, documented method to find and assess research addressing a question. Its conclusions still depend on the included studies and what the search covered.
Meta-analysis
Statistically combines results from multiple studies. Combining studies does not remove weaknesses in their design or make unlike populations interchangeable.
Not classified
This record has no recognized label in this filter. It does not mean the publication used no method, or that no research exists.

Definitions draw on DataCite resource types; Cochrane review methods; NLM: association and causation. RSRC’s dataset and classification rules are explained in our methodology.

Citation tools
Download RIS Download BibTeX 


              
              

            

          

        


      

      

    

        
Transparency

        
Evidence and review status

        
This page contains AI-generated content. No human content review or subject-matter-expert review is recorded.

    


    

                    

                
Source basis

                

                    Downloaded PDF
                

            

                    

                
Source updates

                

                    No notice found at last check
                

            

                    

                
AI-generated page content

                

                    Yes
                

            

                    

                
Automated checks

                

                    Passed
                

            

                    

                
Administrative approval

                

                    Yes
                

            

                    

                
Human content review

                

                    Not recorded
                

            

                    

                
Subject-matter-expert review

                

                    Not recorded
                

            

            


    

        
            How this was prepared
        
        

                            

                    
Source basis

                    

                    
RSRC downloaded and privately stored a copy of the paper for internal analysis. The PDF is not offered to viewers from this page.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    PDF added to RSRC:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Source updates

                    

                    
No incoming update notice was found in the dated Crossref response. Coverage is incomplete, particularly for corrections and expressions of concern; this is not a guarantee that the source is valid or unchanged.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Last source-status attempt:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
AI-generated page content

                    

                    
AI-generated research notes displayed on this page: Synopsis, Identified gaps, Methods, Limitations, Future work. The paper itself is not described as AI-generated.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Document analysis recorded:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                            
  • 
                                    Synopsis generation recorded:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                            
  • 
                                    Page record updated:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Automated checks

                    

                    
The current, source-bound synopsis passed the recorded versioned publication checks.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Checks completed:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                            

                            
                                View passed checks (3)
                            
                            
    
                                                                    
  • Length, completeness, repetition, refusal, boilerplate, and active-markup screening
    • 
                                                                    
  • Numerical claims checked against the available source text
    • 
                                                                    
  • English-source lexical grounding check
    • 
                                                            

                        

                                        

                

                            

                    
Administrative approval

                    

                    
The record is approved for public display, but a complete historical administrator action is not recorded.


                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Human content review

                    

                    
No human review is recorded for the AI-generated content displayed on this page.


                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Subject-matter-expert review

                    

                    
RSRC has not recorded review of this content by a subject-matter or methods expert.


                    
                                        

                

                    

    


    

        Review-state definitions

        Found a possible error?
        Request a correction.
    



    



              

        
                  

            
Synopsis

            
The publication provides a neutral, source-grounded synopsis of Mapping romance fraud research – a systematic review by Kassem and Carter (2023). Its purpose is to survey more than two decades of peer‑reviewed articles on romance fraud to offer a holistic view of the crime and to identify gaps in the literature. The authors describe a systematic literature review of English-language, peer‑reviewed works published from 2000 to 2023, drawing on multiple databases and searching terms such as romance fraud and online dating fraud. Their analysis groups 41 papers into ten thematic areas, aiming to map the field rather than to assess methodologies or extrapolate quantitative findings. The principal findings present a comprehensive taxonomy of romance fraud research. The ten themes cover: definitions and terminology; the impact on victims; profiles of criminals and victims; methods and techniques used by offenders; why victims become susceptible; the psychology of criminals; links between romance fraud and other crimes; investigative challenges; prevention and victim protection; and how victims can be supported. The review notes that romance fraud is a substantial but under‑researched crime with harms extending beyond financial loss to psychological suffering, and it highlights significant inconsistencies in terminology that impede clear understanding and policy coordination. The authors identify several literature gaps, including varied victim and perpetrator profiles, limited understanding of criminal psychology, a need for research on online identity misrepresentation, and a call for better linkage to related crimes and protective interventions. In terms of implications, the review suggests directions for policy and practice, including addressing under‑reporting, reducing victim blaming, fostering international collaboration, and developing technologies to counter romance fraud. It emphasizes viewing romance fraud as a form of grooming and abuse and calls for more targeted support for victims and more rigorous future study of protections, prevention, and the broader societal impact.

          

        
                  

            
Identified Gaps

            
The review identifies limited and conflicting evidence on victim and offender profiles, especially victim age. Offender psychology and rationalization, investigative challenges, predictors of recognizing fraudulent profiles, victim identity-verification practices, and impacts on third parties whose identities are stolen remain under-researched. Links between romance fraud and related grooming-based crimes, effective victim support after reporting, tailored protections for diverse groups including neurodivergent victims, and technologies to identify fictitious profiles also lack sufficient research.

          

        
                  

            
Methods

            
This systematic literature review searched multiple databases and search engines for English-language, peer-reviewed academic articles published from 2000 to 2023. Searches used romance-fraud-related terms and scam variants, supplemented by reference-list review. Articles had to have an empirical or theoretical focus on romance fraud; papers focused on online fraud generally were excluded. Researchers read relevant sources to establish focus, scope, and methodology, producing a final sample of 41 articles grouped into 10 themes.

          

        
                  

            
Limitations

            
The review is limited to English-language peer-reviewed journal articles published between 2000 and 2023 and therefore may omit relevant non-English, gray-literature, book, or post-2023 evidence. Its conclusions also reflect an uneven underlying literature: studies of victim and offender profiles yield conflicting results, and several domains, including offender psychology and investigation, have received little research attention.

          

        
                  

            
Future Work

            
Future research should examine diverse victim and offender profiles; offender psychology, motives, opportunities, and rationalizations; investigative challenges; profile-authenticity verification; harms to people whose identities are misappropriated; links with grooming-based crimes; and post-reporting support. It should test protections for heterogeneous victim groups, including neurodivergent victims, shift attention from victim weakness to offender power, and develop technologies that identify fictitious profiles and counter fraud.

          

              

    
    

        
Related Research Insights

        

            See how this publication connects to RSRC's living evidence syntheses through current citations and research-topic mapping.