Skip to main content

Romance Scams and Older Adults: A Health and Social Care Perspective

Oluwatoyin Sorinmade (2025) — Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine

What do these research terms mean?
Preprint
A manuscript shared before formal peer review and publication. Check whether a later published version is available.
Dataset
A collection of data or examples for others to inspect or reuse. It can appear in Library search and topic mapping, but RSRC does not use dataset records as evidence in Research Insights.
Dissertation or thesis
Research submitted for an academic degree. This describes its format, not its reliability.
Journal article
An article published in a journal. This label alone does not establish peer review, study quality, or how well the findings apply elsewhere.
Qualitative research
Examines experiences, meanings, or processes, often through interviews or observations. It can explain how something happens without estimating how common it is.
Quantitative research
Uses numerical measurements to describe patterns or test relationships. A relationship between two measurements does not by itself show that one causes the other.
Systematic review
Uses a planned, documented method to find and assess research addressing a question. Its conclusions still depend on the included studies and what the search covered.
Meta-analysis
Statistically combines results from multiple studies. Combining studies does not remove weaknesses in their design or make unlike populations interchangeable.
Not classified
This record has no recognized label in this filter. It does not mean the publication used no method, or that no research exists.

Definitions draw on DataCite resource types; Cochrane review methods; NLM: association and causation. RSRC’s dataset and classification rules are explained in our methodology.

Citation tools


              
              

Transparency

Evidence and review status

This page contains AI-generated content. No human content review or subject-matter-expert review is recorded.

Source basis
Downloaded PDF
Source updates
No notice found at last check
AI-generated page content
Yes
Automated checks
Passed
Administrative approval
Yes
Human content review
Not recorded
Subject-matter-expert review
Not recorded
How this was prepared
Source basis

RSRC downloaded and privately stored a copy of the paper for internal analysis. The PDF is not offered to viewers from this page.

  • PDF added to RSRC:
Source updates

No incoming update notice was found in the dated Crossref response. Coverage is incomplete, particularly for corrections and expressions of concern; this is not a guarantee that the source is valid or unchanged.

  • Last source-status attempt:
AI-generated page content

AI-generated research notes displayed on this page: Synopsis, Identified gaps, Methods, Limitations, Future work. The paper itself is not described as AI-generated.

  • Document analysis recorded:
  • Page record updated:
Automated checks

The current, source-bound synopsis passed the recorded versioned publication checks.

  • Checks completed:
View passed checks (3)
  • Length, completeness, repetition, refusal, boilerplate, and active-markup screening
  • Numerical claims checked against the available source text
  • English-source lexical grounding check
Administrative approval

The record is approved for public display, but a complete historical administrator action is not recorded.

Human content review

No human review is recorded for the AI-generated content displayed on this page.

Subject-matter-expert review

RSRC has not recorded review of this content by a subject-matter or methods expert.

Review-state definitions
Found a possible error? Request a correction.

Synopsis

The proliferation of online interaction has expanded opportunities for connection and encounter, alongside increasingly sophisticated forms of exploitation. This article centers on romance scams as a significant threat, with a focus on older adults as a particularly vulnerable segment. Digital platforms such as dating sites, social networks, and messaging services are described in relation to how they can facilitate rapid rapport, plausible narratives, and requests for funds. The discussion traces the general arc of such schemes—from initial contact and relationship-building to financial requests—without citing any specific cases or data points. The piece surveys risk factors that may heighten vulnerability among older adults, including social isolation, perceived companionship needs, and varying levels of trust in online environments. It considers how scammers adapt strategies to perceived weaknesses and how emotional investment can influence decision-making, all presented in descriptive terms rather than prescriptive advice. The article also examines the roles of media literacy, platform safeguards, and community awareness, offering a broad overview of mechanisms by which harm can unfold and persist. Consequences are described in general terms, noting financial losses, psychological distress, and potential physical harm that can accompany these scams. The synopsis outlines the range of impact on individuals, families, and communities—affecting autonomy, confidence in online services, and willingness to engage with digital platforms. The piece concludes with a broad look at policy, prevention, and support infrastructure, emphasizing the availability of resources and the need for coordinated responses while acknowledging the diversity of experiences among older adults.

Identified Gaps

The review identifies practical weaknesses in enforcement: safeguarding professionals report few successful outcomes, citing difficulties obtaining sufficient evidence and competing criminal-justice priorities. The article calls for stronger platform responsibility, better-resourced legal and police services, financial-sector collaboration, and international cooperation, indicating gaps in coordinated prevention, detection, investigation, and victim support. It does not present empirical evaluation of these responses.

Methods

Narrative review article synthesizing cited literature, statutory provisions, case law, and practice-oriented discussion. It examines older adults’ social, digital, psychological, cognitive, and mental-health-related vulnerability to romance scams; describes scam tactics and harms; and discusses safeguarding and legal responses under the Care Act 2014, Mental Capacity Act 2005, and Mental Health Act 1983, primarily for England and Wales.

Limitations

This is a review and practice-focused legal/health-and-social-care discussion rather than an original empirical study. The supplied text provides no systematic search strategy, eligibility criteria, sample, data collection, quantitative synthesis, or outcome evaluation. Its legal analysis is explicitly centred on England and Wales, so practical and legal recommendations may not directly transfer to other jurisdictions despite claimed global relevance.

Future Work

Evaluate whether multi-agency safeguarding involving health care, social services, police, and financial institutions reduces losses and improves support for older victims. Assess training and awareness initiatives for community care professionals. Examine effectiveness of public-awareness campaigns, platform regulation, bank fraud detection, therapeutic support, and international investigative cooperation.

See how this publication connects to RSRC's living evidence syntheses through current citations and research-topic mapping.