Skip to main content

Romance Scam and Legal Interpreting/Translation

Masako Mouri (2024) — IICAH Official Conference Proceedings

What do these research terms mean?
Preprint
A manuscript shared before formal peer review and publication. Check whether a later published version is available.
Dataset
A collection of data or examples for others to inspect or reuse. It can appear in Library search and topic mapping, but RSRC does not use dataset records as evidence in Research Insights.
Dissertation or thesis
Research submitted for an academic degree. This describes its format, not its reliability.
Journal article
An article published in a journal. This label alone does not establish peer review, study quality, or how well the findings apply elsewhere.
Qualitative research
Examines experiences, meanings, or processes, often through interviews or observations. It can explain how something happens without estimating how common it is.
Quantitative research
Uses numerical measurements to describe patterns or test relationships. A relationship between two measurements does not by itself show that one causes the other.
Systematic review
Uses a planned, documented method to find and assess research addressing a question. Its conclusions still depend on the included studies and what the search covered.
Meta-analysis
Statistically combines results from multiple studies. Combining studies does not remove weaknesses in their design or make unlike populations interchangeable.
Not classified
This record has no recognized label in this filter. It does not mean the publication used no method, or that no research exists.

Definitions draw on DataCite resource types; Cochrane review methods; NLM: association and causation. RSRC’s dataset and classification rules are explained in our methodology.

Citation tools


              
              

Transparency

Evidence and review status

This page contains AI-generated content. No human content review or subject-matter-expert review is recorded.

Source basis
Downloaded PDF
Source updates
No notice found at last check
AI-generated page content
Yes
Automated checks
Passed
Administrative approval
Yes
Human content review
Not recorded
Subject-matter-expert review
Not recorded
How this was prepared
Source basis

RSRC downloaded and privately stored a copy of the paper for internal analysis. The PDF is not offered to viewers from this page.

  • PDF added to RSRC:
Source updates

No incoming update notice was found in the dated Crossref response. Coverage is incomplete, particularly for corrections and expressions of concern; this is not a guarantee that the source is valid or unchanged.

  • Last source-status attempt:
AI-generated page content

AI-generated research notes displayed on this page: Synopsis, Identified gaps, Methods, Limitations, Future work. The paper itself is not described as AI-generated.

  • Document analysis recorded:
  • Page record updated:
Automated checks

The current, source-bound synopsis passed the recorded versioned publication checks.

  • Checks completed:
View passed checks (3)
  • Length, completeness, repetition, refusal, boilerplate, and active-markup screening
  • Numerical claims checked against the available source text
  • English-source lexical grounding check
Administrative approval

The record is approved for public display, but a complete historical administrator action is not recorded.

Human content review

No human review is recorded for the AI-generated content displayed on this page.

Subject-matter-expert review

RSRC has not recorded review of this content by a subject-matter or methods expert.

Review-state definitions
Found a possible error? Request a correction.

Synopsis

This practitioner-oriented descriptive conference paper draws on the author's legal interpreting and translation experience in Japanese police, prosecution, and court settings. It presents three real Japan-related romance-scam cases, including a detailed celebrity-impersonation case, and discusses interrogation and interpreting challenges. The case victim reportedly transferred 75 million yen over three years and five months. The victim sold artwork and luxury goods and borrowed money from friends and children in response to the offender's demands. The paper reports that reliable romance-scam information is difficult to collect because offenders conceal their identities and communicate via SNS and AI-generated content.

Identified Gaps

Japanese official statistics combine romance and investment scams within general fraud, preventing exact romance-scam counts and identification of crime characteristics and consequences. The paper also states that interrogation procedures and accumulated knowledge specific to romance scams remain limited, while interpreters commonly receive little case information before questioning.

Methods

A practitioner-oriented descriptive conference paper drawing on the author’s legal interpreting and translation experience in Japanese police, prosecution, and court settings. It presents three real Japan-related romance-scam cases, including a detailed celebrity-impersonation case, and discusses interrogation and interpreting challenges. No systematic sampling, data collection protocol, or formal analysis is reported.

Limitations

The paper reports that reliable romance-scam information is difficult to collect because offenders conceal their identities and communicate via SNS and AI-generated content. Official Japanese data aggregate romance scams with other fraud, obstructing exact case counts. The article also provides no systematic case-selection criteria, interview data, or quantitative analysis, limiting generalizability.

Future Work

Accumulate and classify romance-scam knowledge and data separately from general fraud in Japan. Clarify current conditions, criminal patterns, and consequences to support faster and better-informed interrogation and improve legal interpreters’ working conditions.

See how this publication connects to RSRC's living evidence syntheses through current citations and research-topic mapping.