To pay or not to pay: An exploratory analysis of sextortion in the context of romance fraud
Cross, C. ; Holt, K. ; Holt, TJ. (2023) — Criminology & Criminal Justice
Type:
Journal Article
Country:
Australia
Synopsis (AI-Generated)
This quantitative study analyzed 2,686 de-identified Scamwatch romance-fraud reports filed from July 2018 through July 2019, including 210 narratives manually coded as sextortion. Logistic models compared sextortion with other romance-fraud reports and examined which sextortion reporters lost money. Sextortion reporters were more likely to be young and male and to report loss of personal details, but were less likely than other romance-fraud reporters to report financial loss. Within the sextortion group, self-reported financial hardship and chronic illness were associated with a greater likelihood of losing money. Unscreened and unverified self-reports, missing fields, international submissions, and inference from one variable-length text field likely undercount sextortion and prevent generalization.
Identified Gaps (AI-Generated)
Research on the association between romance fraud and sextortion is limited. Little is known about characteristics of victims facing sextortion within romance fraud, factors associated with financial loss, and how sextortion and romance-fraud victims differ. The dataset also cannot explain victims’ reasons for responding to sextortion demands or reporting, including motivations, expectations, barriers, and help-seeking. More evidence is needed across geographic contexts and with larger samples.
Methods (AI-Generated)
The study analyzed de-identified Scamwatch romance-fraud reports provided by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, lodged July 2018–July 2019. After duplicate removal and missing-data exclusions, 2,686 reports were analyzed; 210 involved coded sextortion. Researchers manually reviewed mandatory free-text descriptions to identify sextortion and financial loss. Two binary logistic regressions examined: (1) correlates of sextortion reporting among romance-fraud reports and (2) correlates of financial loss among sextortion reporters. Measures included contact channel, loss of personal details, residence, self-reported vulnerability indicators, age, and gender.
Limitations (AI-Generated)
The online, self-report Scamwatch data are not generalizable to all victims, especially non-reporters. Anyone globally could submit a report without screening or human interaction, preventing assessment of data quality. Reports contained missing fields and all details were unverified, reflecting complainants’ recollections and framing. Sextortion was manually inferred from a single, variable-length free-text field rather than a dedicated question, likely underrepresenting its occurrence. Some reports categorized as romance fraud may not have involved a pre-existing relationship, complicating differentiation from standalone sextortion.
Future Work (AI-Generated)
Use larger, comprehensive samples in Australia and globally to test whether chronic illness and financial hardship consistently predict sextortion victimization and payment. Compare geographic contexts. Directly ask sextortion victims about their decision-making, motivations and expectations for reporting, barriers to reporting, and help-seeking, to identify intervention points and inform prevention, policy, and practice. Further distinguish romance fraud from sextortion and examine sextortion within romance-fraud schemes as a potentially distinct offending category.
AI-Generated Content Notice
The synopsis and research notes on this page were generated with AI from available publication information and, when available, the uploaded paper text. They may contain errors, omissions, or interpretation issues. Readers should follow the DOI or source link, review the original publication, and make their own judgment about the content.
Found a possible error? Request a correction.