Waspada Cinta Maya: Membangun Kesadaran Bahaya Online Love Scam Masyarakat Desa 'Damai' Nglinggi, Kabupaten Klaten

Pramana, Pramana ; Priastuty, Chairunnisa Widya ; Utari, Prahastiwi (2024) — Dharma Sevanam : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat

Synopsis (AI-Generated)

The digital era offers clear conveniences but can also lead people astray if reading and interpretive skills are not sufficiently developed. Against this backdrop, a community outreach effort centered on social interaction in Nglinggi Village is framed as a modest but purposeful step toward improving literacy, with a particular focus on digital literacy related to media ethics and recognizing online love scams. Such scams are increasingly common and tend to confuse both those who perpetrate them and those who become victims, highlighting the need for critical understanding in online encounters. The initiative aims to translate awareness into practical understanding, linking everyday digital behavior with ethical considerations and protective practices. The article presents knowledge sharing and ongoing dialogue as essential mechanisms for broadening access to information. The transmission of insights and the presence of continuous debate function as effective means for people to connect and to enhance collective knowledge. The climate of conversation, fostered by the committed involvement of local residents, indicates sustained interest and focus on the issue. By observing existing problems and following the trajectories of discussions with field experts, the study points toward digital literacy as a topic worthy of wider attention and suggests it should inform future programming and guidance. From these observations, the findings propose that digital literacy ought to become a shared priority and be incorporated into a layered educational framework. The goal is to deepen understanding and promote more optimal and positive use of the internet, ensuring that ethical considerations and practical competencies accompany digital navigation. Integrating digital literacy into the broader education curriculum would align local concerns with overarching educational aims, supporting residents in engaging with online spaces with greater confidence and responsibility.

Identified Gaps (AI-Generated)

Participants reportedly knew about cybercrime risks but did not understand prevention, warning signs, or appropriate assistance for online love-scam victims. The paper also suggests that education should extend beyond cities to villages and across age groups, where internet use is expanding. It does not provide a systematic assessment of these needs or of intervention outcomes.

Methods (AI-Generated)

This community-service project delivered a participatory, empowerment-oriented awareness session in Nglinggi Village on 19 June 2023. Initial direct observation and information from village government were used to understand the target setting. Forty representatives of village institutions attended a three-hour talk-show-style session, including presentations on social-media ethics and online love-scam risks, prevention, and victim assistance, plus discussion, questions, and activities. Evaluation relied on observation and activity documentation.

Limitations (AI-Generated)

The project reports acceptance of materials based on observation and documentation, without pre/post measures, a comparison group, follow-up, or a systematic account of participant-level outcomes. The sample consisted of 40 village-institution representatives rather than the whole community, so claims about broader awareness or preventive effects should be treated cautiously.

Future Work (AI-Generated)

Integrate digital literacy into staged educational curricula from primary school through higher education, so internet use across communities becomes wiser, more beneficial, and less harmful.

AI-Generated Content Notice

The synopsis and research notes on this page were generated with AI from available publication information and, when available, the uploaded paper text. They may contain errors, omissions, or interpretation issues. Readers should follow the DOI or source link, review the original publication, and make their own judgment about the content.

Found a possible error? Request a correction.