Love Scamming in the Digital Era: Legal Protection and Challenges in Handling Love Scam Cases on Dating Applications in Indonesia
Soleha Liliani Malik ; Fakhris Lutfianto Hapsoro (2025) — AT-TAKLIM: Jurnal Pendidikan Multidisiplin
Type:
Journal Article
Country:
Indonesia
Synopsis (AI-Generated)
This article investigates the regulatory landscape surrounding cyber-enabled romance fraud carried out through social media platforms in Indonesia. Love scams have risen as a notable problem, especially among younger adults who engage with dating applications. Although there are statutes that address cybercrime in general, the analysis identifies a gap in which no specific provision directly targets love scams, suggesting potential shortcomings in how this form of deception is defined, pursued, and regulated within the current legal framework. By examining how existing rules apply to online dating-related offenses and where they fall short, the study frames the issue as one of regulatory clarity, enforceability, and effectiveness in delivering redress to victims. In this way, the work situates love scams within the broader governance of cybercrime while signaling the need for more precise legal articulation to address this particular modality of harm. Employing normative research methods, the study probes the obstacles victims face in seeking justice and highlights deficiencies in the protections offered by the existing body of law. It identifies practical and doctrinal barriers that hinder the pursuit of remedies, including ambiguities in law, procedural hurdles, and gaps in targeted remedies for online dating victims. The findings also point to an unwelcome consequence of these gaps: a large portion of victims refrain from reporting incidents due to feelings of shame and fear of stigma. This propensity to remain silent contributes to a lack of data on how widespread such offenses are, complicating efforts to quantify the problem, allocate resources, and design effective interventions. The analysis emphasizes that underreporting undermines both empirical understanding and policy responsiveness, thereby impeding progress toward safeguarding potential victims. The article concludes with a call for strengthening the regulatory framework and increasing public awareness to reduce vulnerability to love scams. It advocates for more precise legal provisions that directly address the unique risks posed by romantic fraud in digital social spaces and for mechanisms that improve access to justice for those harmed. Beyond legal reform, the study underscores the importance of awareness-raising initiatives that inform the public about the dangers of online dating deception and encourage timely reporting. Taken together, the work argues that aligning the legal regime with the realities of love scams and elevating public understanding are essential steps toward better protection and more effective redress for victims.
Identified Gaps (AI-Generated)
Indonesia lacks a specific legal regulation for love scams, leaving victim protection inadequate and legal interpretation uncertain. The paper identifies incomplete case data because victims often avoid reporting due to shame, stigma, and low trust in legal institutions. It also identifies gaps in platform protection of user data, digital-evidence access, local law-enforcement capacity, and cross-border investigative cooperation.
Methods (AI-Generated)
This is normative legal research based on secondary or library materials. It uses a statutory approach to examine applicable Indonesian laws and victim protection, and a conceptual approach to consider legal theories and assess whether current laws effectively address love scams. The discussion illustrates legal issues with reported cases and cited sources.
Limitations (AI-Generated)
The study is a normative legal analysis and does not report primary data collection, systematic case sampling, or interviews with victims, investigators, or platforms. Several claims about prevalence, victim experiences, and enforcement obstacles rely on cited reports or illustrative cases. Consequently, its conclusions about trends and institutional effectiveness should be treated as legal-policy analysis rather than empirical measurement.
Future Work (AI-Generated)
Develop explicit love-scam legislation covering relevant offender tactics and deterrent sanctions. Assess or implement specialized training for law-enforcement personnel, public awareness campaigns, digital-safety workshops, psychological support, and financial-recovery assistance for victims. Strengthen international cooperation through information exchange, joint response strategies, and legal cooperation for offenders abroad.
AI-Generated Content Notice
The synopsis and research notes on this page were generated with AI from available publication information and, when available, the uploaded paper text. They may contain errors, omissions, or interpretation issues. Readers should follow the DOI or source link, review the original publication, and make their own judgment about the content.
Found a possible error? Request a correction.