The Online Romance Scam: A Serious Cybercrime
Whitty, MT. ; Buchanan, T. (2012) — Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking
Type:
Journal Article
Country:
United Kingdom
Synopsis (AI-Generated)
A YouGov omnibus online survey sampled 2,028 Great Britain adults aged 18+ during 6-8 July 2011. Randomly selected members of an approximately 300,000-person panel were invited; the response rate was about 33.3%. Data were weighted against census data to represent British adults. Just over half of British respondents had heard of the online romance scam before the survey. Television and newspapers were the most frequently reported sources of prior awareness, while online dating sites were rarely reported. The prevalence estimate was based on a small self-reported victimized subgroup (0.65%) in an online panel survey and was extrapolated using the proportion of British adults online.
Identified Gaps (AI-Generated)
The authors state that much more research is needed on who is vulnerable to online romance scams and on victims’ psychological impact. They also indicate that it remains unclear whether prior knowledge of the crime prevents victimization. The study identifies a need to examine victims targeted via dating sites in greater depth.
Methods (AI-Generated)
A YouGov omnibus online survey sampled 2,028 Great Britain adults aged 18+ during 6–8 July 2011. Randomly selected members of an approximately 300,000-person panel were invited; the response rate was about 33.3%. Data were weighted against census data to represent British adults. Participants answered closed questions on prior awareness of online romance scams, media sources of awareness, and whether they or someone they knew had lost money. The authors used descriptive estimates and a chi-square test for gender differences in media awareness.
Limitations (AI-Generated)
The prevalence estimate was based on a small self-reported victimized subgroup (0.65%) in an online panel survey and was extrapolated using the proportion of British adults online. The survey measured whether respondents had heard of the scam and whether they or acquaintances had been victimized, rather than collecting detailed victim experiences, psychological outcomes, offender tactics, or reporting behavior. The authors also note that only a small proportion of the sample used online dating sites, limiting interpretation of awareness via those sites.
Future Work (AI-Generated)
Compare public knowledge of the scam with victim numbers in future studies to assess whether awareness is preventive. Conduct further research on people vulnerable to romance scams and victims’ psychological impact. Examine more deeply the impacts on and views of victims targeted through dating sites. Assess communication channels, including greater use of radio, for disseminating scam knowledge.
AI-Generated Content Notice
The synopsis and research notes on this page were generated with AI from available publication information and, when available, the uploaded paper text. They may contain errors, omissions, or interpretation issues. Readers should follow the DOI or source link, review the original publication, and make their own judgment about the content.
Found a possible error? Request a correction.