Skip to main content

Love and Technology

Christine Gauci ; Mary Grace Vella (2026) — The Palgrave Handbook of Global Social Problems

Citation activity

Total citations · Google Scholar
Unavailable
Average per calendar year
Citation count unavailable

Counts reflect Google Scholar’s coverage and do not measure research quality. Source, calculation and limitations

View Original Source (opens in a new tab)

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-68127-2_904-1 (opens in a new tab)

Type:   Book Chapter
Country:   Global
Tags:   AI-Enabled Fraud, Deepfakes, Digital Intimacy, Digital Literacy, Emotional Manipulation, Financial Fraud, Identity Deception, Online Dating, Psychological Trauma, Romance Scams, Victim Impact, Victim Trauma
What do these research terms mean?
Preprint
A manuscript shared before formal peer review and publication. Check whether a later published version is available.
Dataset
A collection of data or examples for others to inspect or reuse. It can appear in Library search and topic mapping, but RSRC does not use dataset records as evidence in Research Insights.
Dissertation or thesis
Research submitted for an academic degree. This describes its format, not its reliability.
Journal article
An article published in a journal. This label alone does not establish peer review, study quality, or how well the findings apply elsewhere.
Qualitative research
Examines experiences, meanings, or processes, often through interviews or observations. It can explain how something happens without estimating how common it is.
Quantitative research
Uses numerical measurements to describe patterns or test relationships. A relationship between two measurements does not by itself show that one causes the other.
Systematic review
Uses a planned, documented method to find and assess research addressing a question. Its conclusions still depend on the included studies and what the search covered.
Meta-analysis
Statistically combines results from multiple studies. Combining studies does not remove weaknesses in their design or make unlike populations interchangeable.
Not classified
This record has no recognized label in this filter. It does not mean the publication used no method, or that no research exists.

Definitions draw on DataCite resource types; Cochrane review methods; NLM: association and causation. RSRC’s dataset and classification rules are explained in our methodology.

Citation tools
Download RIS Download BibTeX 


              
              

            

          

        


      

      

    

        
Transparency

        
Evidence and review status

        
This page contains AI-generated content. No human content review or subject-matter-expert review is recorded.

    


    

                    

                
Source basis

                

                    Downloaded PDF
                

            

                    

                
Source updates

                

                    No notice found at last check
                

            

                    

                
AI-generated page content

                

                    Yes
                

            

                    

                
Automated checks

                

                    Passed
                

            

                    

                
Administrative approval

                

                    Yes
                

            

                    

                
Human content review

                

                    Not recorded
                

            

                    

                
Subject-matter-expert review

                

                    Not recorded
                

            

            


    

        
            How this was prepared
        
        

                            

                    
Source basis

                    

                    
RSRC downloaded and privately stored a copy of the paper for internal analysis. The PDF is not offered to viewers from this page.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    PDF added to RSRC:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Source updates

                    

                    
No incoming update notice was found in the dated Crossref response. Coverage is incomplete, particularly for corrections and expressions of concern; this is not a guarantee that the source is valid or unchanged.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Last source-status attempt:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
AI-generated page content

                    

                    
AI-generated research notes displayed on this page: Synopsis, Identified gaps, Methods, Limitations, Future work. The paper itself is not described as AI-generated.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Document analysis recorded:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                            
  • 
                                    Page record updated:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Automated checks

                    

                    
The current, source-bound synopsis passed the recorded versioned publication checks.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Checks completed:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                            

                            
                                View passed checks (3)
                            
                            
    
                                                                    
  • Length, completeness, repetition, refusal, boilerplate, and active-markup screening
    • 
                                                                    
  • Numerical claims checked against the available source text
    • 
                                                                    
  • English-source lexical grounding check
    • 
                                                            

                        

                                        

                

                            

                    
Administrative approval

                    

                    
An authenticated administrator approved the bibliographic record for public Library display. This is not a review of every research claim.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Approved for public display:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Human content review

                    

                    
No human review is recorded for the AI-generated content displayed on this page.


                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Subject-matter-expert review

                    

                    
RSRC has not recorded review of this content by a subject-matter or methods expert.


                    
                                        

                

                    

    


    

        Review-state definitions

        Found a possible error?
        Request a correction.
    



    



              

        
                  

            
Synopsis

            
This interdisciplinary chapter synthesizes criminology, psychology, sociology, and technology research to trace the history and current operation of romance fraud, its effects on victims, and policy implications. It describes fabricated self-disclosure and personal stories as tools for creating intimacy and dependency, and discusses how AI can help one operator sustain many simultaneous interactions and tailor language to psychological or cultural cues. Reported harms include loss of savings, homes, inheritances, and longer-term financial security. The chapter is a narrative secondary synthesis, not a new victim, offender, platform, or experimental study. It gives little methodological detail about source selection or analysis and appears weighted toward Western evidence, limiting completeness and global generalization.

          

        
                  

            
Identified Gaps

            
The text signals gaps in empirical evidence on AI-driven deception and suggests broader issues such as geographic generalizability beyond Western contexts, lack of standardized definitions for identity-related fraud, and the need for interdisciplinary methods to study victims’ experiences and interventions.

          

        
                  

            
Methods

            
The chapter uses a literature-based, interdisciplinary synthesis across criminology, psychology, sociology, and technology. It provides historical and contemporary analysis of romance fraud and AI-enabled deception, collating existing studies to map mechanisms, victim impacts, and policy implications rather than reporting new empirical data.

          

        
                  

            
Limitations

            
The work relies on secondary sources and a narrative synthesis without new data; it appears centered on Western contexts, which may limit generalizability; the text lacks explicit methodological detail about data collection and analysis; potential biases in cited literature.

          

        
                  

            
Future Work

            
The chapter calls for digital literacy, ethical AI development, and cross-sector collaboration to mitigate harm. It also highlights the need for empirical research on AI-enabled deception, platform responsibility, victim support, and the development of measurement frameworks and policy guidelines to protect consumers in online romance contexts.

          

              

    
    

        
Related Research Insights

        

            See how this publication connects to RSRC's living evidence syntheses through current citations and research-topic mapping.