Scam Techniques in Pig Butchering Scams: Case Study
Dove, Martina (2024) — SSRN Electronic Journal
DOI:
10.2139/ssrn.5015196
Type:
Journal Article
Country:
United States
Synopsis (AI-Generated)
Qualitative case-study analysis of three conversations from one pig butchering scam. Methods included transcript review, coding for known and novel scam techniques (e.g., authority, urgency, altercasting), examination of conversational flow and control, and alignment with existing literature on fraud and grooming. The conversations lasted more than one year, continued despite the victim's attempts to stop, and resulted in a loss of $107,500. Praise and future plans for cooperation gradually shifted to berating, humiliation, shame, and pressure for larger investments when the victim did not comply. Limitations include a single-case design with limited generalizability, potential transcript/translation nuances, and lack of victim-side data.
Identified Gaps (AI-Generated)
Explicit gaps include the single-victim design limiting generalizability and the absence of victim-side factors. The paper recommends larger, multi-conversation analyses and simultaneous study of perpetrator and victim dynamics to achieve a more comprehensive understanding.
Methods (AI-Generated)
Qualitative case-study analysis of three conversations from one pig butchering scam. Methods included transcript review, coding for known and novel scam techniques (e.g., authority, urgency, altercasting), examination of conversational flow and control, and alignment with existing literature on fraud and grooming.
Limitations (AI-Generated)
Limitations include a single-case design with limited generalizability, potential transcript/translation nuances, and lack of victim-side data. Findings may not capture all scam techniques, and results may reflect context-specific dynamics rather than universal patterns.
Future Work (AI-Generated)
Future studies should analyze larger numbers of conversations to validate the findings, and examine victim factors alongside perpetrator techniques. Additional work could compare pig butchering with other romance-fraud variants, explore cross-cultural differences, and assess interventions or preventive measures in broader contexts.
AI-Generated Content Notice
The synopsis and research notes on this page were generated with AI from available publication information and, when available, the uploaded paper text. They may contain errors, omissions, or interpretation issues. Readers should follow the DOI or source link, review the original publication, and make their own judgment about the content.
Found a possible error? Request a correction.