Skip to main content

Transparency

Evidence and review status

This page contains AI-generated content. No human content review or subject-matter-expert review is recorded.

Source basis
Downloaded PDF
AI-generated page content
Yes
Automated checks
Passed
Administrative approval
Yes
Human content review
Not recorded
Subject-matter-expert review
Not recorded
How this was prepared
Source basis

RSRC downloaded and privately stored a copy of the paper for internal analysis. The PDF is not offered to viewers from this page.

  • PDF added to RSRC:
AI-generated page content

AI-generated research notes displayed on this page: Synopsis, Identified gaps, Methods, Limitations, Future work. The paper itself is not described as AI-generated.

  • Document analysis recorded:
  • Page record updated:
Automated checks

The current, source-bound synopsis passed the recorded versioned publication checks.

  • Checks completed:
View passed checks (3)
  • Length, completeness, repetition, refusal, boilerplate, and active-markup screening
  • Numerical claims checked against the available source text
  • English-source lexical grounding check
Administrative approval

The record is approved for public display, but a complete historical administrator action is not recorded.

Human content review

No human review is recorded for the AI-generated content displayed on this page.

Subject-matter-expert review

RSRC has not recorded review of this content by a subject-matter or methods expert.

Review-state definitions
Found a possible error? Request a correction.

Synopsis

A cross-sectional quantitative online survey recruited 380 Malaysian adults aged 18-67 who used the internet daily and had an active social-media account. Participants completed measures of relationship satisfaction, loneliness, interpersonal mattering, and a 15-item gullibility measure representing romance-scam susceptibility. Loneliness and low mattering formed a significant serial mediation pathway to susceptibility when social-media engagement was high. Low relationship satisfaction was associated with greater susceptibility to online romance scams, particularly at high social-media engagement. Self-reported measures may have introduced reporting bias or inaccurate assessment of relationship satisfaction, loneliness, mattering, and social-media engagement.

Identified Gaps

The study identifies a need to clarify temporal and causal relationships among relationship satisfaction, loneliness, mattering, social-media engagement, and romance-scam susceptibility. It also indicates limited integration of emotional needs and online engagement within existing routine activity and persuasion frameworks. The findings motivate evaluation of preventive education, monitoring, and supportive online-environment approaches.

Methods

A cross-sectional quantitative online survey recruited 380 Malaysian adults aged 18–67 who used the internet daily and had an active social-media account. Participants completed measures of relationship satisfaction, loneliness, interpersonal mattering, and a 15-item gullibility measure representing romance-scam susceptibility. The authors tested a moderated serial-mediation model using PROCESS Macro Model 92, 5,000 bootstrap resamples, and 95% confidence intervals.

Limitations

Self-reported measures may have introduced reporting bias or inaccurate assessment of relationship satisfaction, loneliness, mattering, and social-media engagement. The cross-sectional design prevents causal or temporal inference. In addition, the outcome is a self-reported gullibility-based susceptibility measure rather than documented romance-scam victimization, which limits conclusions about actual victim experiences.

Future Work

Use longitudinal designs to examine how relationship satisfaction, loneliness, mattering, social-media engagement, and susceptibility change over time. Develop and test targeted awareness and educational interventions for people experiencing relationship dissatisfaction, loneliness, or high social-media use. Examine safer platform environments, including improved monitoring and supportive online communities.

See how this publication connects to RSRC's living evidence syntheses through current citations and research-topic mapping.