Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Reported case

「頂き女子」、9月に二審判決 弁護側、量刑不当を主張|全国のニュース|北國新聞

www.hokkoku.co.jpJapaneseObserved 2024-08-07
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

Story groups for this report

Contextual research groupings, not verified case membership.

How to read this record

Own Riri-chan manual-sellingRomancefraud clip and title plannedSeptember appellate ruling/defence contests punishment. Appealsproceeding context at unclearstage, not completed specifictrialsession, conviction/newimposedterm/finality/servedtime. Sparse source no personalpaidquantity/Watanabeage/name/affectiondetails imported from23/24, and manualsales not automatically separate offence.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

No geographic role could be established from the available text.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Procedural context

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific procedural contexts

field
title
reason
September future appellate ruling is not an actual completed appeal result or new imposed sentence.
subject
Riri_chan_alias_in_own_source
reported outcome
planned_appeal_judgment
is entire code dimension denial
false
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
desc
reason
Own Riri-chan manual-sellingRomancefraud clip and title plannedSeptember appellate ruling/defence contests punishment. Appealsproceeding context at unclearstage, not completed specifictrialsession, conviction/newimposedterm/finality/servedtime. Sparse source no personalpaidquantity/Watanabeage/name/affectiondetails imported from23/24, and manualsales not automatically separate offence.
subject
Aug05_unit_30
reported outcome
own_source_limits
is entire code dimension denial
false
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
trial
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
87b56e97c685516e70376999add22daaa5a25199c3075d6b62000cf4116dd1f8
current source binding
input hash
33efe0a4f3978cc34f607cb3aec3732339157ac853ab8b45f1d8f095e107a3d5
decision id
4bad25d6ca12229433b12242cb76f5aa1536246cadaad15596cfeb417744ce73
document id
055ea3bd5a11caa129810a89f2e06eb00f9c9118b7f5610b084063d83eecf3f2
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
ec9f2ec855f76d86992cc24f29726d6ed24c797e012309863b28150945c4b5b7
finding evidence sha256
7a65b45637153d37adabfe0658c6dbc6390e075a0bc7172c7c85110818de9e5c
enrichment payload sha256
41b8b212bb52d5269cd69102e36197a313220b9d4668e8c0b929cd951f756ab2
approved delta ids
Item 1
S35:procedural:055ea3bd5a11caa129810a89f2e06eb00f9c9118b7f5610b084063d83eecf3f2
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/055ea3bd5a11caa129810a89f2e06eb00f9c9118b7f5610b084063d83eecf3f2/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
Item 2
json pointer
/current_context_overlay/own_procedural_subject_qualifications/0
artifact sha256
9f371afc6f4184fdc2af3b5af5b418f4d8713c51b26f7ff7f9436015cd68b660
annotation key
f3621ceaf4558724930cdf67ff20a9db7ab2e455d24679e53a6145bc4479837f

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Justice proceedings and outcomes

trialreported occurrenceStage: unclear
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
authority
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harminsufficient context
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesreported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextnot reported in available text
Technical facilitationnot reported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptioninsufficient context
Involvement in other offendinginsufficient context
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

Shared wording

「頂き女子」、9月に二審判決 弁護側、量刑不当を主張|全国のニュース|Web東奥

Rare own Riri/manual/155m-affection/pending September appeal material supports bounded proceeding continuity with protected Watanabe family, preserving sparse own alias labels and the four applied subject qualifications. First hearing/closed hearing, prior9yr8m fine, prosecution request and futureSeptember30 are source-specific, not completed appellate result/finality/servedterm/refund. Full name/age/term/fine/host payment remain only on owning URLs; later imposition/appeal/SupremeCourt endpoints are retained with their stronger own stages.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: 055ea3bd5a11caa129810a89f2e06eb00f9c9118b7f5610b084063d83eecf3f2
Decision: 4bad25d6ca12229433b12242cb76f5aa1536246cadaad15596cfeb417744ce73
Base reviewed revision: 87b56e97c685516e70376999add22daaa5a25199c3075d6b62000cf4116dd1f8

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.