Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Research & trends

Revealed: The five most dangerous states for online dating and why

www.dailymail.co.ukEnglishObserved 2024-08-26
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

How to read this record

Own PrivacyJournal composite datingrisk factors Romance/fraud/sexoffender matches/STDs/violentcrime separate scopes. NotRomance-causedphysicalsexual harm/independent incidence/clinicalrisk.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

No geographic role could be established from the available text.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
desc
reason
Own PrivacyJournal composite datingrisk factors Romance/fraud/sexoffender matches/STDs/violentcrime separate scopes. NotRomance-causedphysicalsexual harm/independent incidence/clinicalrisk.
subject
Aug26_unit_28
reported outcome
own_source_limits
is entire code dimension denial
false
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
research_statistics
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
0a2d02cea48715917ea263a2689263619681b9e53b574eae189cbb7f240d7f54
current source binding
input hash
166af3d38f48db23e6b30b1eac7e2f9ce9b0e8f0efbb300be7a834fc81ca9e8d
decision id
768267bb1f4725172141a06b4a27ce6682fcaa8de0e6da7d7eec821e8f8290dc
document id
138720921b9fa568a3bb45a405630ca60927b2cf5d3e9f229f0ca17330a41900
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
0aaf9152926d3e55cfd02a84d3337ad1b8bbf000af8ef59ea12c3b3bffaa4013
finding evidence sha256
fa0c1d03a12c9f4d173cd6f08513568eff4ad8f32b6ccd45a0e3aaa1f3b9d53c
enrichment payload sha256
16e84ee132726b70febd8b5684424238d7a39688edb0f30483e6b3ef978b6a0c
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/138720921b9fa568a3bb45a405630ca60927b2cf5d3e9f229f0ca17330a41900/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
427ea4d09bb88256e07da28664459fcd53f00b09d57f857d33eeca8b5f108a5a

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

No positive thematic assignment was supported by the available text.

All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violenceinsufficient context
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harminsufficient context
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harminsufficient context
Investment pretextnot reported in available text
Technical facilitationnot reported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptionnot reported in available text
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: 138720921b9fa568a3bb45a405630ca60927b2cf5d3e9f229f0ca17330a41900
Decision: 768267bb1f4725172141a06b4a27ce6682fcaa8de0e6da7d7eec821e8f8290dc
Base reviewed revision: 0a2d02cea48715917ea263a2689263619681b9e53b574eae189cbb7f240d7f54

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.