Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Commentary

Entendendo o estelionato sentimental sob a perspectiva de gênero (parte 2)

www.conjur.com.brPortugueseObserved 2024-03-13
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

How to read this record

Own Conjur commentary fragment refers to last week; no earlier story details, offence year or country from publisher. No positive application supported by this sparse excerpt.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

No geographic role could be established from the available text.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
commentary
reason
Select article commentary for the legal/gender discussion, retaining its general interpretive scope rather than policy or a new victim event. Original authored interpretation: Own legal/gender commentary title, not policy proposal or particular victim loss. Original stage: reported. Original scope: general. Whole row limits: No corecountry, calendar year, money, policy or incidentdetails from publisher/lastweek/partnumber.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
dcb3be74d0a8015162f10e38bdbe4088835ed2a3f74b66388ed863365bff3fae
current source binding
input hash
ad6ef6d895cabff4d040fa7aa42a7c8ff765bb6aaff871926087354370cddb80
decision id
4897c00d86aeba18d6b1a4f77770090049e09a528cfc5fa93aafe4fd36559483
document id
37cb9e164e8c73c66f670a0063bd77fc5dbda4e57a6e0d48b33860f8e1e84eb3
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
4e96b3eff643329ab466626b86e2552d87c5e3897febb7d50865cdf5ce83dcf8
finding evidence sha256
bbf7b535d1309955a5fdf7928433a01cb7ce6fe9e24bd077c33dda22acb84dea
enrichment payload sha256
83e47f3d8473c9a89513ac629ef3713760bf3eaa2f66c93a0e85bf5cf31e7613
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/37cb9e164e8c73c66f670a0063bd77fc5dbda4e57a6e0d48b33860f8e1e84eb3/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
d6175d38357cead694ab5f2222500bf285c5823616bc1c6baf64c05bd5978632

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

No positive thematic assignment was supported by the available text.

All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framinginsufficient context
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harminsufficient context
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responseinsufficient context
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextnot reported in available text
Technical facilitationinsufficient context
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptioninsufficient context
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: 37cb9e164e8c73c66f670a0063bd77fc5dbda4e57a6e0d48b33860f8e1e84eb3
Decision: 4897c00d86aeba18d6b1a4f77770090049e09a528cfc5fa93aafe4fd36559483
Base reviewed revision: dcb3be74d0a8015162f10e38bdbe4088835ed2a3f74b66388ed863365bff3fae

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.