Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Research & trends

Most and least dangerous states for online dating: study

www.yahoo.comEnglishObserved 2024-05-29
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

Story groups for this report

Contextual research groupings, not verified case membership.

How to read this record

This mixed online-dating safety study lists romance scams, identity theft, fraud and violent-crime rates. It reports neither a particular romance-fraud injury nor a victim committing another offence. Online dating is not sufficient evidence of a specific technical deception or relationship mechanism; do not transfer mixed-risk statistics into romance-only incidence. This own record W20240527_20240602C0044 retains its exact URL and wording; no independent-source, person or case inference follows from a matching copy.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

No geographic role could be established from the available text.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
desc
reason
This mixed online-dating safety study lists romance scams, identity theft, fraud and violent-crime rates. It reports neither a particular romance-fraud injury nor a victim committing another offence. Online dating is not sufficient evidence of a specific technical deception or relationship mechanism; do not transfer mixed-risk statistics into romance-only incidence.
subject
Own mixed online-dating safety study
subject basis
own_generic_subject
reported outcome
This mixed online-dating safety study lists romance scams, identity theft, fraud and violent-crime rates. It reports neither a particular romance-fraud injury nor a victim committing another offence. Online dating is not sufficient evidence of a specific technical deception or relationship mechanism; do not transfer mixed-risk statistics into romance-only incidence.
subject name literals
No listed value
is entire code dimension denial
false
subject label has no borrowed name
true
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
ef1122cf634e31ba799d8ef2aabe12d84bbc5f9e031b2ca4f197f26edba3bfcc
current source binding
input hash
abb45369c3f9ae4a4da40143019e759950311004222e9987e15efe69b3560a78
decision id
9efaa345ad64927c7917d334486deb3201a42ba023783f65a159fd100841329c
document id
8682b1743d5f56f2e4a1f28f77cfdad43a1ab62657cbc321dcd2c0f539a06111
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
fb51c407ccb7eb6703768b0bfb88cd7f930a52161bdf1a06ed9ad777996c286a
finding evidence sha256
7155c5a291999f9ada977b30125cf45ddbcd78f4951418fa98a382ad3fd443e9
enrichment payload sha256
49ebd5df01f1429f34126f585d77ed45d2c8524a8b2ef170ca14808a0f81e8f0
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/8682b1743d5f56f2e4a1f28f77cfdad43a1ab62657cbc321dcd2c0f539a06111/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
f6c51fe76c0d4f217f7a8780e854b095bc99689ef196c261731c752d5e933bb9

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

No positive thematic assignment was supported by the available text.

All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmnot reported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextnot reported in available text
Technical facilitationinsufficient context
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptioninsufficient context
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

Shared wording

Most and least dangerous states for online dating: study

The own title and named Privacy Journal ranking description match, including the repeated violent-crime wording. Keep the two source bindings but treat the matching coverage as one contextual work lead; do not sum studies, cases, risks, or denominators.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: 8682b1743d5f56f2e4a1f28f77cfdad43a1ab62657cbc321dcd2c0f539a06111
Decision: 9efaa345ad64927c7917d334486deb3201a42ba023783f65a159fd100841329c
Base reviewed revision: ef1122cf634e31ba799d8ef2aabe12d84bbc5f9e031b2ca4f197f26edba3bfcc

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.