Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Reported case

'Romance fraud' probes results in man facing trial over possessing £296,000

www.belfastlive.co.ukEnglishObserved 2024-10-04
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

How to read this record

Own proceeds£296000trial/charge and baildatingrestriction. Proceedsnottarget paidloss, notconviction/enteredplea/acquittal/currentplatformmethod.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

No geographic role could be established from the available text.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Procedural context

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific procedural contexts

field
desc
reason
No plea entered does not mean denial/acquittal; bail datingrestriction not guilt.
subject
laundering_accused
reported outcome
unentered_plea
is entire code dimension denial
false
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
trial
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
charge
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
c7ac280259917a581ae24731b030fa9bdafb3519fa16ec94b3d8a16338de85cf
current source binding
input hash
a06b21eee135888ed5e5f59418479280e608d89fb536bec69045e330789a03a5
decision id
f3040aa9e3fcda9ced5b76a04512c55347d8281bc87a85af985e69863115827b
document id
92d2f27e1c293b61dbf2ba5f2958ae84417e0d2f2bf4851c64877255523bdc0b
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
8205cd4af8877993c71114fead0eb1eb9ddfee7737d5ef58df427ab41e238c73
finding evidence sha256
865a5ab954638a8e49632939a38d25cf287144eaaf7c0ba07d06ac4b5aa45a39
enrichment payload sha256
b3df2b103f276010120f3b90f7ba45b430625ce758553d9e2d0569dc94fa5ca0
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/92d2f27e1c293b61dbf2ba5f2958ae84417e0d2f2bf4851c64877255523bdc0b/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
a6fd96af28d747c2c235a28896a304ae9a84f7e7138f0b059c2bbc3876a5d3f9

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Moving money for a scheme

launderingallegationStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Justice proceedings and outcomes

trialreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
authority
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Justice proceedings and outcomes

chargereported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
authority
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harminsufficient context
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesreported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextnot reported in available text
Technical facilitationinsufficient context
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptioninsufficient context
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemereported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: 92d2f27e1c293b61dbf2ba5f2958ae84417e0d2f2bf4851c64877255523bdc0b
Decision: f3040aa9e3fcda9ced5b76a04512c55347d8281bc87a85af985e69863115827b
Base reviewed revision: c7ac280259917a581ae24731b030fa9bdafb3519fa16ec94b3d8a16338de85cf

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.