Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.
Story groups for this report
Contextual research groupings, not verified case membership.
Own Dutch report combines dating fraud and Marktplaats fraud in a sentence of240hours community service and a one-year conditional prison term. Preserve the mixed-offence scope: the full penalty is not allocated to romance alone. Imposed community work/conditional imprisonment is not completed work or served custody. Bare platform/offence labels add no financial loss or fabricated relationship detail; resident wording is not a court location.
Evidence basis: saved title description
Places in the available evidence
No geographic role could be established from the available text.
Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.
Procedural context
These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.
source specific procedural contexts
field
desc
reason
240hours community work is imposed and one-year custody is conditional; neither is proven completed/served, and penalties cover mixed offences.
These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.
source specific current qualifications
field
title
reason
Own Dutch report combines dating fraud and Marktplaats fraud in a sentence of240hours community service and a one-year conditional prison term. Preserve the mixed-offence scope: the full penalty is not allocated to romance alone. Imposed community work/conditional imprisonment is not completed work or served custody. Bare platform/offence labels add no financial loss or fabricated relationship detail; resident wording is not a court location.
subject
own_source_context
subject basis
own_generic_subject
reported outcome
source_specific_qualification
subject name literals
No listed value
is entire code dimension denial
false
subject label has no borrowed name
true
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false
Reported developments
These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.
development assertions
role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
sentence
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.
Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.
No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.
A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.
Record: c73ca31e06c255582d954817a806e5373261d914c30bcfd5f825aa46d5acb2fd Decision: 4e826c76be82d2ac8aa4ef2f1a6494a7fea1881de823d1fc011aa4adf838a64c Base reviewed revision: 775e7c0a1c8e7082a35e7bd0995d22ad44b0788116698f642c2dac9e3dc11114
The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.