Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC
← Back to your resultsResearch & trends
Exploring the factors that influence people's ability to detect lies online
How to read this record
Own research introduction lists phishing, romance scams and fake news while discussing lie-detection studies. Psychological studies are not experienced mental-health harm or diagnosis; generic Internet context not a specific technical method. No financial loss/request, actual fabricated relationship, experimental result, intervention effect, defined prior vulnerability, criminal case, national country or explicit actyear. Do not code listed other-fraud categories as an actual co-offence or borrow study content.
Evidence basis: saved title description
Places in the available evidence
No geographic role could be established from the available text.
Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.
Themes reported in the text
These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.
No positive thematic assignment was supported by the available text.
All 24 assessed themes
| Theme | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Blame, stigma and responsibility framing | not reported in available text |
| Homicide and lethal violence | not reported in available text |
| Disruption of daily life | not reported in available text |
| Financial and property harm | insufficient context |
| Suicide and self-harm | not reported in available text |
| Family and social harm | not reported in available text |
| Protection or recovery of assets | not reported in available text |
| Policy and regulatory response | not reported in available text |
| Justice proceedings and outcomes | not reported in available text |
| Coercion and exploitation | not reported in available text |
| Psychological distress | not reported in available text |
| Blackmail and extortion | not reported in available text |
| Help, reporting and prevention | not reported in available text |
| Physical or sexual harm | not reported in available text |
| Investment pretext | not reported in available text |
| Technical facilitation | insufficient context |
| Investigation and operational response | not reported in available text |
| Organization and division of labor | not reported in available text |
| Relationship-based deception | insufficient context |
| Involvement in other offending | not reported in available text |
| Continued or renewed targeting | not reported in available text |
| Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerability | not reported in available text |
| Institutional barriers or harmful response | not reported in available text |
| Moving money for a scheme | not reported in available text |
Connected reporting
Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.
No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.
Research provenance
1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.
A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.
Record: e5e3441efd7201ec4261d782b2e4524ed9cb9ea4e4e0949389c2c8b58ba6362b
Decision: bb66b3186d2a627fb930026f528e30267e05243ce8f0ff6b871d81d713d821d7
Base reviewed revision: c8e3e8b2b5f1dbb61ad3be960b6ab7cfabd1d8070547f900946035fccdd3ba4a
The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.