Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC
Search the research collection
Find reporting by topic, place or language. Open a record to see why it was included and what the available evidence supports.
The chart uses every search filter above and all matching records, across every results page. The percentage denominator is all included URLs in the same dates, before theme, language, country or text filters.
Distinct included URLs matching these filters in each observation month. Select a point to explore its records. On small screens, scroll the chart horizontally.
A URL counts once per month and can appear in several months or themes. Themes describe the current record assessment; months show URL observations, not when events or each claim first appeared. Warnings, allegations and reported experiences are all included when coded. Partial months, collection gaps and changes in sources affect both measures. A higher share does not establish a higher risk to victims.
| Observation month | Matching URLs | All included URLs | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2024 | 51 | 51 | 100.0% |
Each record represents a source web page, not a verified incident. Different URLs can describe the same event. About these records.
Both own metadata variants were read and retain different saved metadata dates but identical title/description. The2023 URL path and2024 metadata dates are not crime years. The description is clipped after an increase; no missing comparison is filled. Dating label/venue alone supplies no mechanism or specific digital method.
Prevention & supportOwn title and clipped description support a monetary loss with a love-scam label. No method, offender identity, calendar-year event date, recovery or psychological consequence is supplied.
Reported caseCurrent ROOT qualifications: The child-in-distress example expressly concerns urgent money in this mixed online-scam warning. Code only a general-warning requested-money theme for that separate example, not a romance payment, completed loss, currency or amount. The phantom-boyfriend inheritance remains a separate unquantified pretext. Neither an investment/trading offer nor a relationship-to-return promise is reported in the own description. A supposed inheritance does not supply an investment mechanism; not reported is not an explicit denial. The generic warning supplies no actual person whose pre-existing bereavement, isolation, dependence or targeting circumstances are described. Source evaluative labels for credulity are framing, not proof of prior vulnerability; not reported is not denial. Historical original manual note (preserved; superseded only where the explicit ROOT qualifiers above apply): General mixed-scheme warning with explicit romantic fiction example. Preserve source evaluative framing incautos/crédulos separately from analysis; no victim fault endorsed. Prospective inheritance is neither a paid loss nor investment, and the son-branch demand does not supply the romantic branch financial details. No event country or year.
Prevention & supportCurrent ROOT qualifications: Own mixed child-emergency example is a generic urgent-money pretext, not an actual request to an identified target. Keep the separate example in interpretation without assigning it to the romantic branch. Own online-danger metaphor is warning content, not a completed assistance outcome or measured prevention. Own phantom-boyfriend phrase is a generic fabricated-romance example, not an identified attempted or completed case. Historical original manual note (preserved; superseded only where the explicit ROOT qualifiers above apply): Full own title/description inspected at this URL. Urgent money is attached to the child-emergency example only, not borrowed as a romance demand. Millionaire inheritance is promised/pretextual, no realized assets/payment/return rate. Digital method I: online alone does not name a communication/account/payment mechanism. No country from publisher, URL or language; no calendar year. No actual named case, legal outcome, recovery or clinical harm. Unmentioned cells N, not explicit denial.
Prevention & supportCurrent ROOT qualifications: Own mixed child-emergency example is a generic urgent-money pretext, not an actual request to an identified target. Keep the separate example in interpretation without assigning it to the romantic branch. Own online-danger metaphor is warning content, not a completed assistance outcome or measured prevention. Own phantom-boyfriend phrase is a generic fabricated-romance example, not an identified attempted or completed case. Historical original manual note (preserved; superseded only where the explicit ROOT qualifiers above apply): Full own title/description inspected at this URL. Urgent money is attached to the child-emergency example only, not borrowed as a romance demand. Millionaire inheritance is promised/pretextual, no realized assets/payment/return rate. Digital method I: online alone does not name a communication/account/payment mechanism. No country from publisher, URL or language; no calendar year. No actual named case, legal outcome, recovery or clinical harm. Unmentioned cells N, not explicit denial.
Prevention & supportCurrent ROOT qualifications: Own mixed child-emergency example is a generic urgent-money pretext, not an actual request to an identified target. Keep the separate example in interpretation without assigning it to the romantic branch. Own online-danger metaphor is warning content, not a completed assistance outcome or measured prevention. Own phantom-boyfriend phrase is a generic fabricated-romance example, not an identified attempted or completed case. Historical original manual note (preserved; superseded only where the explicit ROOT qualifiers above apply): Full own title/description inspected at this URL. Urgent money is attached to the child-emergency example only, not borrowed as a romance demand. Millionaire inheritance is promised/pretextual, no realized assets/payment/return rate. Digital method I: online alone does not name a communication/account/payment mechanism. No country from publisher, URL or language; no calendar year. No actual named case, legal outcome, recovery or clinical harm. Unmentioned cells N, not explicit denial.
Prevention & supportCurrent ROOT qualifications: Own mixed child-emergency example is a generic urgent-money pretext, not an actual request to an identified target. Keep the separate example in interpretation without assigning it to the romantic branch. Own online-danger metaphor is warning content, not a completed assistance outcome or measured prevention. Own phantom-boyfriend phrase is a generic fabricated-romance example, not an identified attempted or completed case. Historical original manual note (preserved; superseded only where the explicit ROOT qualifiers above apply): Full own title/description inspected at this URL. Urgent money is attached to the child-emergency example only, not borrowed as a romance demand. Millionaire inheritance is promised/pretextual, no realized assets/payment/return rate. Digital method I: online alone does not name a communication/account/payment mechanism. No country from publisher, URL or language; no calendar year. No actual named case, legal outcome, recovery or clinical harm. Unmentioned cells N, not explicit denial.
Prevention & supportBoth own variants read: only newer title explicitly says Germany, bound to that exact evidence; older title receives no borrowed country clause. Dating-platform/LoveScamming labels do not supply intimacy mechanics or technical function. Seven-year span is not seven separate cases or calendar years. No Luxembourg from outlet/domain, actual custody chronology, verified victim count or links to other sentenced-man URLs.
Reported caseCurrent ROOT qualifications: Dinero does not specify cash delivery. The own narrative is an unquoted general mixed-scam warning concerning a financial target, not a concrete offender account or a single/general romance loss. Correct subtype and scope/actor/stance while preserving requested/general_warning/mixed_scheme/not_established. The generic warning stage is not_applicable; the urgent-money pretext remains in the interpretation. Own urgent-money child-emergency example is a generic mixed-scam warning; no actual demand, cash delivery or romance payment is established. The full financial subtype/scope/actor/stance qualification is separately explicit. Own phantom-boyfriend phrase is a generic fabricated-romance pretext. No actual inheritance, return, payment or personal-case stage is supplied. Historical original manual note (preserved; superseded only where the explicit ROOT qualifiers above apply): Family-emergency and romantic-inheritance examples remain distinct; no cross-example fabricated finance details or actual personal case inferred. Generic online venue gives no technical function. No Spain from publisher/domain, absolute actyear, actual million inheritance, diagnosis, victim count, returned funds or enacted policy.
Prevention & supportInvestment I: SNS investment fraud and SNS romance fraud are adjacent separately defined types, not automatically a romance-to-investment bridge. Assistance I: editorial reports expansion/definitions but clipped text lacks specific advisory/service action. 全国 not global; 昨年１... clipped relative time supplies no year or quantity. No invented downstream legal, harm or policy facts.
CommentaryNicaragüense is target nationality; Las Vegas/Nevada is subnational workplace and does not authorize a national core country. Do not infer US nationality of singer/persona or country from publisher. Age73 and lifetime savings do not establish clinical harm/material deprivation/vulnerability. Clipped workplace clause supplies no more; no year, technical method, arrest, refund or independent guilt finding.
Reported caseOwn TNP clipped mixed-scam report:31 people, not31 cases or romance-only offenders. No branch-level financial quantity or offence date. Preserve suspicion and planned court stage; do not import the separately read police release wording.
Related mentionOwn police object independently read; it supports planned charges unlike TNP wording about court. Do not import financial sums, named defendants, case counts or age vulnerability. No nationality or actual operation-country code from China Officials Impersonation label.
Related mentionOwn international-network and targeting account, not a measured prevalence finding. “Fastest-growing” has no period, denominator or numeric rate. No financial-loss value, event year or Tinder-use inference.
CommentaryOwn Stern variant is clipped after Gegen. Preserve its sparse amount/count scope; EUR500,000, accomplices or other allegations from other records are not part of this note.
Reported caseOwn clipped description and explicit feigned-love headline support financial and relationship proposals only. No police/prosecutorial outcome or calendar year is supplied; do not join identities or borrow a method from other Pforzheim reports.
Reported caseRelationship I: Liebesbetrug label/dating portals do not describe own affection/persona step. Technology I: venue alone. Sentence retained without separately inventing arrest, trial dates, compensation, psychiatric/material consequences or event year.
Reported caseCurrent ROOT qualifications: Own FBI-tips title supplies generic advice, not a completed assistance outcome or investigation. Adjacent own statistical claims remain separate and are not assigned a reporting year. Historical original manual note (preserved; superseded only where the explicit ROOT qualifiers above apply): Relationship I: Romance label lacks own fabricated-affection/persona mechanism. No technology from URL or genericRomance; no clinical, judicial, asset or policy stage. Source does not state reporting calendar year or actual incident country; SouthCarolinians retained as population description only.
Prevention & supportFalse matchmaking introduction and online romance are stated; no actual platform, messaging/fund-transfer function or AI detail, so technology insufficient. No China from language/outlet/元, calendar year, arrest, conviction, actual sex of every actor or multiple-case count.
Reported caseDescription is publisher boilerplate. Hohem Schaden is unspecified damage here; no amount/cash details imported from RTL or other outlets, so financial context insufficient. Dating portals alone leave relationship/technology insufficient. Germany literal is a source jurisdiction candidate only, approvalfalse; no Luxembourg from publisher, eventyear from URL,500k loss,4targets,2accomplices or shared-case assertion.
Reported caseAcusado and preso describe accusation/custody but do not establish formal charge, arrest act, conviction, imposed sentence or served duration; enforcement/justice insufficient. Nigerian is origin, USmarine and Syria are persona/pretext, Málaga subnational custody; no national corecountry inferred. No clinical harm, actual military identity, calendar year, force or extra loss.
Reported caseCurrent ROOT qualifications: Own what-do-you-do question describes generic dating-app money solicitation, not a reported specific demand, payment, proven fraud or delivered advice. Retain the question in interpretation. Historical original manual note (preserved; superseded only where the explicit ROOT qualifiers above apply): Love-scams discussion label and dating-app acquaintance alone do not state fabricated intimacy/technical function. Question asks what to do but supplies no actual guidance/service or delivered assistance, so assistance insufficient. No actual sex/sexual violence from series brand, Philippines from publisher, year, arrest, loss total or clinical condition.
Prevention & supportThis own SR record supplies EUR500,000 and eight years. Do not import accomplices, four victims, seven-year history, charge detail or refunds from other URLs; no year of offending or judgment is explicit in the own text.
Reported caseCurrent ROOT qualifications: Selected police-warning clause is generic content; keep the separate mixed Love-Scam/Push-TAN aggregate loss without allocating all of it to romance or recasting it as prevention effect. Historical original manual note (preserved; superseded only where the explicit ROOT qualifiers above apply): Relationship I: namedLoveScam no own manipulated-affection step. Technology I: PushTANtrick is another type in same mixed report, no proved romance account misuse/digital action. Age not prior-vulnerability evidence. No charges, recovery, psychological or material consequences, event year.
Reported caseCurrent ROOT qualifications: Own ergaunern money sentence describes a general scam method; it does not supply the particular sentenced person's paid amount. Preserve the separate concrete court-sentence application and its actual stage. Selected pretended-love phrase describes the general method alongside the court report. No particular relationship stage is supplied by this generic phrase; the court occurrence stays separate. Own app-flirting then emergency-story sentence describes a general technical communication method, not an identified transaction request. Preserve that method in interpretation and keep the separate court action. Historical original manual note (preserved; superseded only where the explicit ROOT qualifiers above apply): General mechanism and bounded reported sentence kept distinct; no new multiple-case allocation. Financial emergency is perpetrator story, not target prior vulnerability/material harm. No8years from URL, Germany from court locality/domain, conviction finality, time served, money paid by this named case, year or clinical condition.
Reported case