鹿児島50代男性が2700万円被害――「将来一緒に」SNS女性の甘い誘い…ロマンス詐欺、勾玉購入代など振り込む
Kagoshima loss and promise of future together; no extra victims inferred from multiple URLs.
Reported caseData from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC
Search the research collection
Find reporting by topic, place or language. Open a record to see why it was included and what the available evidence supports.
The chart uses every search filter above and all matching records, across every results page. The percentage denominator is all included URLs in the same dates, before theme, language, country or text filters.
Distinct included URLs matching these filters in each observation month. Select a point to explore its records. On small screens, scroll the chart horizontally.
A URL counts once per month and can appear in several months or themes. Themes describe the current record assessment; months show URL observations, not when events or each claim first appeared. Warnings, allegations and reported experiences are all included when coded. Partial months, collection gaps and changes in sources affect both measures. A higher share does not establish a higher risk to victims.
Each record represents a source web page, not a verified incident. Different URLs can describe the same event. About these records.
Kagoshima loss and promise of future together; no extra victims inferred from multiple URLs.
Reported caseAlleged loss and requested career funds; source does not identify Morgan Wallen or Texas case.
Reported case50-year-old Styrian77k pilot deception.
Reported caseKagoshima loss and promise of future together; no extra victims inferred from multiple URLs.
Reported caseDestitution reported; exact housing loss is not established by this wording alone.
Reported casePhoto-page variant of Kagoshima report; retain URL, share story proposal only with matching anchors.
Reported caseThreats to sustain repeated payments; no coercive-labor inference.
Reported casePilot impersonation, reported loss and police warning.
Reported caseTamamura cash investment loss, distinct from nearby cities' crypto cases.
Reported caseRepeated payments and promise of cohabitation; matching77k pilot persona.
Reported caseVoice-cloning allegation, indictment not conviction; lower-bound amount retained as source claim.
Reported caseFirst-person blog uses self-deprecating language; platform name not proof of actual Midjourney participation or AI mechanism.
Reported caseReported loss to a person claiming to be a pilot.
Reported caseMurtal age and exact loss support proposed story link.
Reported caseSpecific repeated requests and failed visit; March is source-relative year, not independently dated.
Reported caseReported loss to a person claiming to be a pilot.
Reported caseCommentary on mixed-fraud statistics and mature-adult targeting; preserve source estimate, no romance allocation of total.
CommentaryAirport detention and beating were alleged scam pretexts; WITHHOLD harm.physical_sexual and response.institutional_harm for those claims.
Reported caseDeposit demanded before meeting; police advice, not a completed loss or a verified employer permission rule.
Reported caseHeadline supports alleged AI scam loss and older-women targeting; mechanism detail sparse.
Reported caseDescription and headline use different occupational labels. Preserve identity uncertainty; mailing own money is not courier activity for others.
Reported casePhoto caption describes Debra Fox loss; photo date is not scam date.
Reported caseRomantic relationships with alleged defrauding; mechanism unspecified, charge not conviction.
Reported caseGroup participants allege punitive physical and sexual abuse; perpetrators of financial fraud may also be harmed. Private evidence only; no graphic report excerpt. Property purchases are not seizures.
Reported caseTwo scam attempts by different online contacts. WITHHOLD repeat_targeting: recurrence against same target does not prove renewed same-operation approach.
Reported case