HCAP における引き出し禁止の真相と自己救済方法の解明 - 裏側レポート - udn部落格
A blog claims investment loss and despair about Japanese police. The sparse account does not establish the precise police response, actual recovery or truth of the allegations.
Reported caseData from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC
Search the research collection
Find reporting by topic, place or language. Open a record to see why it was included and what the available evidence supports.
The chart uses every search filter above and all matching records, across every results page. The percentage denominator is all included URLs in the same dates, before theme, language, country or text filters.
Distinct included URLs matching these filters in each observation month. Select a point to explore its records. On small screens, scroll the chart horizontally.
A URL counts once per month and can appear in several months or themes. Themes describe the current record assessment; months show URL observations, not when events or each claim first appeared. Warnings, allegations and reported experiences are all included when coded. Partial months, collection gaps and changes in sources affect both measures. A higher share does not establish a higher risk to victims.
Each record represents a source web page, not a verified incident. Different URLs can describe the same event. About these records.
A blog claims investment loss and despair about Japanese police. The sparse account does not establish the precise police response, actual recovery or truth of the allegations.
Reported caseA blog claims investment loss and despair about Japanese police. The sparse account does not establish the precise police response, actual recovery or truth of the allegations.
Reported caseA blog claims investment loss and despair about Japanese police. The sparse account does not establish the precise police response, actual recovery or truth of the allegations.
Reported caseAn older grandfather describes losing everything and distress from romance fraud. The short metadata does not name a location or justify a separate case identity.
Reported caseSpanish Jean Booth narrative reports loss of savings and heartbreak after eight months. It is another account of the named case, not evidence of a new victim or psychiatric diagnosis.
Reported caseTitle quotes acute distress and reports a 43-year-old losing $90k to an online boyfriend. Distress is not a diagnosis; the separate national total is not individual loss.
Reported caseAccount reports an Australian older man losing wealth and home after a three-year online deception, with quoted distress. Nationality alone does not establish location; distress is not a diagnosis.
Reported caseAccount reports an Australian older man losing wealth and home after a three-year online deception, with quoted distress. Nationality alone does not establish location; distress is not a diagnosis.
Reported caseFree State woman reports depression, hospitalization and debt after relationship fraud. Hospitalization supports service contact, not treatment effectiveness.
Reported caseAlleged eight-month online relationship deception includes staged illness/death and reported grief; clipped text does not establish financial amount.
Reported caseWaltrop man believed he had a year-long relationship with an actress; heartbreak reported, no specific financial loss stated.
Reported caseWaltrop man believed he had a year-long relationship with an actress; heartbreak reported, no specific financial loss stated.
Reported caseSharon Blakeborough is reported to have lost $60,000 and experienced emotional trauma and a heart attack; causal association is the source claim, not a verified clinical conclusion.
Reported caseBC senior report expressly describes debt and emotional trauma following Facebook romance scam; title amount not summed with other copies.
Reported caseBlakeborough report describes financial and emotional harm, heart attack and Facebook contact. Separation alone is not coded as scam-caused relationship breakdown.
Reported caseA documentary discussion describes a teacher losing four million to a fabricated boyfriend, emotional distress and repeated police warnings. Derisive framing is attributed to this commentary, not endorsed.
CommentaryOJK warning describes financial and psychological consequences of deceptive romance generally; no incident-level harms or counts.
Prevention & supportBBC programme listing describes an Edinburgh woman devastated by an AI romance scam; episode title supports AI, description supports distress, no specific cash loss.
Reported caseGeneral warning describes financial/emotional harm and suicide association, not a documented individual death.
Prevention & supportAcademic discussion of financial harm and trauma associated with prison romance-scam operation; not individual diagnosed outcomes.
Prevention & supportCoverage discusses simulated affection, financial demands and psychological consequences. A quoted person’s self-blame is preserved as a source statement, not endorsed.
CommentaryCoverage discusses simulated affection, financial demands and psychological consequences. A quoted person’s self-blame is preserved as a source statement, not endorsed.
CommentaryA woman describes an $80,000 romance-scam loss and severe heartbreak. “Nearly cost her life” does not establish a suicide attempt, death or homicide.
Reported caseA matchmaking customer describes borrowing-related exploitation, impoverishment and relatives avoiding her. Her payment for matchmaking is distinct from the alleged loan loss.
Reported caseThe report describes a jailed man who abused a woman and separately defrauded people through dating apps. It does not establish that all harms occurred to the same scam victims.
Reported case