Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC
Search the research collection
Find reporting by topic, place or language. Open a record to see why it was included and what the available evidence supports.
The chart uses every search filter above and all matching records, across every results page. The percentage denominator is all included URLs in the same dates, before theme, language, country or text filters.
Distinct included URLs matching these filters in each observation month. Select a point to explore its records. On small screens, scroll the chart horizontally.
A URL counts once per month and can appear in several months or themes. Themes describe the current record assessment; months show URL observations, not when events or each claim first appeared. Warnings, allegations and reported experiences are all included when coded. Partial months, collection gaps and changes in sources affect both measures. A higher share does not establish a higher risk to victims.
| Observation month | Matching URLs | All included URLs | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2024 | 443 | 443 | 100.0% |
| Feb 2024 | 685 | 685 | 100.0% |
| Mar 2024 | 391 | 391 | 100.0% |
| Apr 2024 | 487 | 487 | 100.0% |
| May 2024 | 519 | 519 | 100.0% |
| Jun 2024 | 303 | 303 | 100.0% |
| Jul 2024 | 545 | 545 | 100.0% |
| Aug 2024 | 352 | 352 | 100.0% |
| Sep 2024 | 387 | 387 | 100.0% |
| Oct 2024 | 493 | 493 | 100.0% |
| Nov 2024 | 496 | 496 | 100.0% |
| Dec 2024 | 565 | 565 | 100.0% |
Each record represents a source web page, not a verified incident. Different URLs can describe the same event. About these records.
Repeat-targetingI: recovery advertising and secondary harm do not alone prove recovery scam/intentional retargeting. No arrest borrowed from longer syndicated versions. RelationshipI; no country/event year or recovery-success inference.
Reported caseOwn title/description complete as saved. Label alone relationshipI; no expanded facts from other copies/date/image.
Reported caseOwn short ending quotes recovery difficulty only; no warning call or arrest borrowed from fuller versions. RepeatI/relationshipI; no amount/country/event year or confirmed recovery scam.
Reported caseOwn fuller variant supplies arrest clause absent from several copies; retained only here. RepeatI recovery-targeting mechanism not fully established. RelationshipI; no country/year or charge inferred.
Reported caseThis URL evidence actually read, not inherited from earlier Londoner row. RelationshipI; no country/calendar/proceedings or extra copy facts.
Reported caseAll own fields read. RelationshipI no technique; no facts from other Woodstock URL, country/year or proceedings.
Reported caseOwn sparse title/desc inspected. RelationshipI; no borrowed police/contact, country/date or summed same-story incidence.
Reported caseUnlike clipped secondary-fee copies, own explicit targeting and悪徳 allegation support bounded recovery-scam proposal. No actual returned money, arrest/charge, sourcecountry/year, clinical effect or industry-wide incidence. Internet ads alone no specific interpersonal communication subtype.
Reported casePast year not independently converted; explicit2023 applies statistics only. No country from Dutch/publisher/organization, romance method from dating-fraud label, technical mechanism, experienced diagnosis or totals across stories.
Research & trendsFinancial reconsideration: add one separately own-title-bound financial-risk warning with general_warning/not_applicable/general, without any experienced-payment or total-loss claim. Retain the existing assistance warning and relationship-mechanism hold; mark technology not reported. Original raw note remains literal history.
Prevention & supportZofinger short own record read. No Bitcoin/own initial payment/adjudication borrowed from fuller near-identical URLs. Tinder venue not technique, detailed romance bridge I, personal financial harm I; no country/year/amount/network.
Reported caseRecovery advertisement/refund track record are claims, no assets recovered or returned. Final わらにもすがる思… remains clipped; no psychological diagnosis. Tokyo/Kanto/provider geography not core country, detailed primary romance/technical method I, no blanket lawyer guilt or case union.
Reported caseCBC own description no arrest/other theft from108 borrowed. Toronto/Lakeshore not mapped to country, romance label no detailed mechanism, no actyear/refund/clinical cause/unique-case union.
Reported casePolice say does not itself establish investigation/arrest. Romance label no tactic. No country proxy from locality, event year or borrowed case identity.
Reported caseBoth full same-URL variants read and bound. Dollar ISO/country not from Norfolk/domain/image. Romance label lacks own intimacy mechanism. No police action from photo, date from metadata, clinical harm, refund, amount sum or corroboration from repetitions.
Reported caseReceived-clause clipped after rec... no reporting action/amount reconstructed. Toronto/Lakeshore/provincial name not country mapping, January no absolute year. Financial harm and distinct other-theft act I; romance mechanism I, no CBC amount borrowed.
Reported caseSeparate URL binding, same sparse claim; no corroboration or incident multiplication and no detail transfer.
Reported caseSingle described target and plural headline scope remain separate; no case count or offender-role division inferred.
Reported caseSparse title and matching description only; repeated text is not a new incident or independent corroboration.
Reported caseOwn title and description report plural older targets sending money and a couple being jailed. Retain financial harm and the reported imprisonment outcome without treating the headline magnitude as an allocated victim amount or a term served. The age descriptor alone does not establish an explicit targeting strategy or prior vulnerability; the couple label leaves organization details insufficient. No facts are imported from another URL.
Reported caseOwn short headline/description only; duplicate text is not independent case evidence.
Reported caseAnother source-bound short URL; no new unique incident or extra facts inferred.
Reported caseShort headline repeated in description, no borrowed police or payment facts.
Reported caseSame-text coverage remains separate document evidence, not additional cases; no dates from metadata.
Reported caseNo new-incident count or borrowed route, recovery, year, country, arrest, or clinical detail.
Reported case