38岁女教师网恋遇到杀猪盘被骗走400万_新闻频道_中华网
A documentary discussion describes a teacher losing four million to a fabricated boyfriend, emotional distress and repeated police warnings. Derisive framing is attributed to this commentary, not endorsed.
CommentaryData from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC
Search the research collection
Find reporting by topic, place or language. Open a record to see why it was included and what the available evidence supports.
The chart uses every search filter above and all matching records, across every results page. The percentage denominator is all included URLs in the same dates, before theme, language, country or text filters.
Distinct included URLs matching these filters in each observation month. Select a point to explore its records. On small screens, scroll the chart horizontally.
A URL counts once per month and can appear in several months or themes. Themes describe the current record assessment; months show URL observations, not when events or each claim first appeared. Warnings, allegations and reported experiences are all included when coded. Partial months, collection gaps and changes in sources affect both measures. A higher share does not establish a higher risk to victims.
Each record represents a source web page, not a verified incident. Different URLs can describe the same event. About these records.
A documentary discussion describes a teacher losing four million to a fabricated boyfriend, emotional distress and repeated police warnings. Derisive framing is attributed to this commentary, not endorsed.
CommentaryCoverage discusses simulated affection, financial demands and psychological consequences. A quoted person’s self-blame is preserved as a source statement, not endorsed.
CommentaryCoverage discusses simulated affection, financial demands and psychological consequences. A quoted person’s self-blame is preserved as a source statement, not endorsed.
CommentaryAn advice letter describes a 41-year-old son who believes he is dating a famous actress online. The headline calls him gullible; this is the headline’s framing, not the research assessment. No payment is stated.
Reported caseA man recounts a Bumble date allegedly arranged to impose a large bar bill. His self-critical phrase is quoted as framing, not endorsed.
CommentaryA Tyrolean woman reportedly lost tens of thousands through a relationship scam. Do not endorse commentary that characterizes victims as gullible.
Reported caseA man is expected in court over a reported R1m romantic-deception loss. The court appearance is prospective. “Love is blind” is the headline’s framing, not an explanation endorsed by this collection.
Reported caseA commentary attributes susceptibility to greed, love and fear. The generalizing evaluation is the writer’s framing, not an established trait of victims.
CommentaryPolice and postal staff stopped a 59-year-old man’s transfer after a romantic contact described family hardship. The headline mocks his relationship inexperience; retain that framing without endorsing it. The contact’s illness claims are unverified.
Reported caseA woman describes suicidal thoughts after an alleged €156,000 romantic fraud. These are reported thoughts, not an attempt or death. Accusers seek up to six years; the suspect calls her claim spite, which is attributed rather than endorsed.
Reported caseA self-described former scammer claims some targets are easy to deceive based on appearance. This is attributed stigmatizing framing, not a validated vulnerability assessment.
CommentaryA journalist challenges the idea that victims are naive and discusses organized predation. This is a stated interpretation and blame challenge, not a measured victim profile.
CommentaryA report frames loneliness as potentially leading to poor decisions. Record this as the source’s attribution, not an established victim trait.
CommentaryAn educator says shame and judgment inhibit visibility and criticizes describing victims as foolish. This is an attributed stigma challenge, not a measured reporting rate.
Prevention & supportPSNI warns that fraud can affect anyone and tells victims not to feel ashamed. This is an explicit challenge to stigma rather than evidence of a measured demographic profile.
Prevention & supportA Kinmen report describes a prior NT$2m romance loss and another suspected gaming-credit scam. The headline’s suggestion that she failed to learn is the outlet’s stigmatizing framing, not this project’s judgment.
Reported caseA Dresden report says four offenders were convicted in a love-scamming case. Generalized statements about loneliness do not establish population vulnerability. The headline reports an offender mocking a victim; that framing is attributed, not endorsed.
Reported caseA headline contrasts two Jiangsu women’s romance-scam experiences, including a ¥700,000 loss, and uses blaming language about ignoring warnings. Its ¥2,000 loss-stopping wording is ambiguous.
Reported caseA podcast describes an Irish woman’s romance-scam loss and discusses shame as a barrier to reporting. The discussion does not quantify underreporting.
Reported case