揭秘緣愛俱樂部平台誤信高獲利話術最後血 本無歸 - 騙局終結社qq - udn部落格
The commentary explicitly alleges fake dating, extortion and investment deception; it does not document independently verified victims or losses.
CommentaryData from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC
Search the research collection
Find reporting by topic, place or language. Open a record to see why it was included and what the available evidence supports.
The chart uses every search filter above and all matching records, across every results page. The percentage denominator is all included URLs in the same dates, before theme, language, country or text filters.
Distinct included URLs matching these filters in each observation month. Select a point to explore its records. On small screens, scroll the chart horizontally.
A URL counts once per month and can appear in several months or themes. Themes describe the current record assessment; months show URL observations, not when events or each claim first appeared. Warnings, allegations and reported experiences are all included when coded. Partial months, collection gaps and changes in sources affect both measures. A higher share does not establish a higher risk to victims.
| Observation month | Matching URLs | All included URLs | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2025 | 43 | 591 | 7.3% |
| Feb 2025 | 48 | 1,629 | 2.9% |
| Mar 2025 | 35 | 561 | 6.2% |
| Apr 2025 | 30 | 390 | 7.7% |
| May 2025 | 36 | 398 | 9.0% |
| Jun 2025 | 6 | 209 | 2.9% |
| Jul 2025 | 42 | 522 | 8.0% |
| Aug 2025 | 21 | 447 | 4.7% |
| Sep 2025 | 25 | 613 | 4.1% |
| Oct 2025 | 53 | 483 | 11.0% |
| Nov 2025 | 48 | 392 | 12.2% |
| Dec 2025 | 35 | 333 | 10.5% |
| Jan 2026 | 30 | 530 | 5.7% |
| Feb 2026 | 56 | 1,106 | 5.1% |
| Mar 2026 | 30 | 360 | 8.3% |
| Apr 2026 | 32 | 491 | 6.5% |
| May 2026 | 414 | 785 | 52.7% |
| Jun 2026 | 410 | 842 | 48.7% |
| Jul 2026 | 528 | 1,143 | 46.2% |
| Aug 2026 | 287 | 640 | 44.8% |
| Sep 2026 | 34 | 638 | 5.3% |
| Oct 2026 | 2 | 30 | 6.7% |
Each record represents a source web page, not a verified incident. Different URLs can describe the same event. About these records.
The commentary explicitly alleges fake dating, extortion and investment deception; it does not document independently verified victims or losses.
CommentaryA first-person blog claims investment losses while blinded by love and disappointment with Japanese police. It does not establish the offender identity; the account remains unverified.
Reported caseA first-person blog claims US$43,000 lost through a romantic investment trap; the claim is not independently verified.
Reported caseGeneral blog commentary describes a fabricated successful persona, online romance, trust-building and investment promotion; the source account is not verified.
CommentaryGeneral commentary explicitly describes fabricated successful personas, online romance, trust-building and investment promotion. The blog account is unverified.
CommentaryThe explanation explicitly combines fabricated dating with purported virtual-copyright investment. Official endorsement claimed by the blog is not independently verified.
CommentaryA first-person blog explicitly links online romance and foreign-exchange investment fraud. The short text does not establish identity impersonation or a loss amount.
Reported caseGeneral blog commentary describes a fabricated successful persona, online romance, trust-building and investment promotion; the source account is not verified.
CommentaryThe commentary explicitly alleges fake dating, extortion and investment deception; it does not document independently verified victims or losses.
CommentaryGeneral blog commentary explicitly describes fabricated successful personas, romance, trust-building and investment promotion; source truth is unverified.
CommentaryGeneral blog commentary describes a fabricated successful persona, online romance, trust-building and investment promotion; the source account is not verified.
CommentaryA first-person blog claims investment losses while blinded by love and disappointment with Japanese police. It does not establish the offender identity; the account remains unverified.
Reported caseA first-person blog claims investment losses while blinded by love and disappointment with Japanese police. It does not establish the offender identity; the account remains unverified.
Reported caseGeneral explanation explicitly describes an online romance, fabricated successful persona, trust-building and investment promotion. Blog claims are not independently verified.
CommentaryGeneral commentary explicitly describes a false successful persona, online romance, trust-building and investment promotion. The blog is not independently verified.
CommentaryA first-person blog claims investment losses while blinded by love and disappointment with Japanese police. It does not establish the offender identity; the account remains unverified.
Reported caseA first-person blog claims investment losses while blinded by love and disappointment with Japanese police. It does not establish the offender identity; the account remains unverified.
Reported caseGeneral blog commentary describes a fabricated successful persona, online romance, trust-building and investment promotion; the source account is not verified.
CommentaryA general account describes a purported wealthy persona, romantic attention on social or dating platforms, and whisky investment fraud. This remains an unverified blog explanation.
CommentaryThe first-person blog labels the experience an online romance stock-investment scam. Its recovery wording does not establish returned assets or a supported amount.
Reported caseThe commentary explicitly alleges fake dating, extortion and investment deception; it does not document independently verified victims or losses.
CommentaryThe commentary explicitly alleges fake dating, extortion and investment deception; it does not document independently verified victims or losses.
CommentaryA first-person blog claims US$43,000 lost through a romantic investment trap; the claim is not independently verified.
Reported caseThe commentary explicitly alleges fake dating, extortion and investment deception; it does not document independently verified victims or losses.
CommentaryGeneral explanation explicitly describes an online romance, fabricated successful persona, trust-building and investment promotion. Blog claims are not independently verified.
Commentary