Find reporting by topic, place or language. Open a record to see why it was included and what the available evidence supports.
Matching coverage over time
The chart uses every search filter above and all matching records, across every results page. The percentage denominator is all included URLs in the same dates, before theme, language, country or text filters.
Distinct included URLs matching these filters in each observation month. Select a point to explore its records. On small screens, scroll the chart horizontally.
A URL counts once per month and can appear in several months or themes. Themes describe the current record assessment; months show URL observations, not when events or each claim first appeared. Warnings, allegations and reported experiences are all included when coded. Partial months, collection gaps and changes in sources affect both measures. A higher share does not establish a higher risk to victims.
The description explicitly explains romance-investment deception through a false successful-person persona, sustained chats and trust. General mechanism discussion in promotional-looking material; no distinct victim or actual loss verified.
The description explicitly reports aggregate Montana romance-scam losses in 2025. Coverage of a reported statistic, not a count of independent events; no individual victim is inferred.
The description explicitly explains romance-investment deception through a false successful-person persona, sustained chats and trust. General mechanism discussion in promotional-looking material; no distinct victim or actual loss verified.
The description explicitly explains romance-investment deception through a false successful-person persona, sustained chats and trust. General mechanism discussion in promotional-looking material; no distinct victim or actual loss verified.
The metadata explicitly describes an alleged cross-border love-scamming network transferred to Surabaya prosecutors. Detention/referral or a forthcoming trial is not conviction or sentence.
A platform claims it identifies and exposes romance scammers using AI verification. This is a promotional detection claim, not independently verified effectiveness; AI is a claimed defence, not offender technique.
The description explicitly explains romance-investment deception through a false successful-person persona, sustained chats and trust. General mechanism discussion in promotional-looking material; no distinct victim or actual loss verified.
The description explicitly explains romance-investment deception through a false successful-person persona, sustained chats and trust. General mechanism discussion in promotional-looking material; no distinct victim or actual loss verified.
Romance fraud is explicitly one of several fraud types in a report of aggregate payment-fraud losses. The mixed-scam amount must not be represented as a romance-only total.
A promotional-looking account explicitly describes a promised shared future with children and an alleged loss in a pig-butchering platform scheme. Relevance is supported, but the alleged victim, platform accusation and loss are unverified.
The description explicitly explains romance-investment deception through a false successful-person persona, sustained chats and trust. General mechanism discussion in promotional-looking material; no distinct victim or actual loss verified.
The metadata explicitly connects romance with an alleged fraudulent exchange and claimed loss/debt. This templated promotional-looking blog is topically relevant, but does not verify a victim, an accusation against the named platform or any recovery promise.
The description explicitly explains romance-investment deception through a false successful-person persona, sustained chats and trust. General mechanism discussion in promotional-looking material; no distinct victim or actual loss verified.
The metadata explicitly connects romance with an alleged fraudulent exchange and claimed loss/debt. This templated promotional-looking blog is topically relevant, but does not verify a victim, an accusation against the named platform or any recovery promise.
Police describe a 4.228-million-yen romance scam, marriage promises and fictitious online-shop purchasing for profit. Five payments are reported; duplicate coverage of a case is not another case.
The headline alleges blackmail after a sexual video call and explicitly compares the method to a love scam. Keep the relationship connection as source-associated, not proven grooming; no completed payment or suicide is asserted. Facebook is where information about the allegation appeared, not necessarily where the alleged blackmail was initiated.
The description explicitly reports aggregate Montana romance-scam losses in 2025. Coverage of a reported statistic, not a count of independent events; no individual victim is inferred.
The description explicitly explains romance-investment deception through a false successful-person persona, sustained chats and trust. General mechanism discussion in promotional-looking material; no distinct victim or actual loss verified.
The metadata explicitly connects romance with an alleged fraudulent exchange and claimed loss/debt. This templated promotional-looking blog is topically relevant, but does not verify a victim, an accusation against the named platform or any recovery promise.
The metadata explicitly describes an alleged cross-border love-scamming network transferred to Surabaya prosecutors. Detention/referral or a forthcoming trial is not conviction or sentence.
The metadata explicitly describes an alleged cross-border love-scamming network transferred to Surabaya prosecutors. Detention/referral or a forthcoming trial is not conviction or sentence.
The description explicitly explains romance-investment deception through a false successful-person persona, sustained chats and trust. General mechanism discussion in promotional-looking material; no distinct victim or actual loss verified.
Police report a man in his forties in Aomori losing about 4.228 million yen; the headline explicitly identifies romance fraud and description names a dating app and LINE.
The metadata explicitly describes an alleged cross-border love-scamming network transferred to Surabaya prosecutors. Detention/referral or a forthcoming trial is not conviction or sentence.