Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC
Search the research collection
Find reporting by topic, place or language. Open a record to see why it was included and what the available evidence supports.
The chart uses every search filter above and all matching records, across every results page. The percentage denominator is all included URLs in the same dates, before theme, language, country or text filters.
Distinct included URLs matching these filters in each observation month. Select a point to explore its records. On small screens, scroll the chart horizontally.
A URL counts once per month and can appear in several months or themes. Themes describe the current record assessment; months show URL observations, not when events or each claim first appeared. Warnings, allegations and reported experiences are all included when coded. Partial months, collection gaps and changes in sources affect both measures. A higher share does not establish a higher risk to victims.
Each record represents a source web page, not a verified incident. Different URLs can describe the same event. About these records.
An OpenAI threat-report account covers romantic scams among several AI abuses. It provides no separate romance-fraud count or prevention outcome.
Research & trendsA report describes Cambodian use of ChatGPT and false female identities targeting Indonesian men. Target nationality is not victim location. The explicit 25 February 2026 date is the threat-report publication.
Reported caseA report about OpenAI threat research includes romantic pig-butchering among several abuses. Disclosure of misuse is not proof that all users or all scams use AI.
Research & trendsMisato police report a man’s ¥860,000 crypto loss after a romantic contact offered interest. No recovery or conviction is established.
Reported caseOpenAI reportedly disabled accounts associated with mixed misuse including romance scams and political influence. Account action is not criminal prosecution or a count of scams prevented.
Research & trendsAn explanatory article discusses AI chatfishing and protective advice. The headline’s billions claim has no supporting denominator in this excerpt.
Prevention & supportUS authorities reportedly seized $61m USDT connected to romantic approaches and fake crypto sites. Seized money is not proven returned to victims.
Reported caseCoverage of OpenAI’s threat report describes account bans involving romance fraud alongside unrelated influence and law-enforcement misuse. The account bans are company actions, not criminal findings.
Research & trendsA report describes a Yang-led group using AI-generated women, forged documents, emotional pretexts and cryptocurrency transfers, with 15 reported victims and over ¥1.71m lost. The incomplete procedural date is not filled in.
Reported caseAn Indonesian-language report gives a global deepfake loss figure covering investment and romance schemes. The figure is not a verified romance-only total.
Research & trendsAn explanatory headline discusses AI-assisted romantic fraud. It supplies no measured frequency or individual case.
CommentaryA Thane resident reports losing Rs34.10 lakh after a matrimonial-site contact promoted crypto investment and demanded more to withdraw. Headline and description disagree on age, 34 versus 30; preserve that discrepancy. The crypto platform does not establish that payments themselves were cryptocurrency transfers.
Reported caseA report combines an attributed $36m Illinois romance-fraud figure with a Chicago victim’s $70,000 loss and AI claims. The individual loss must not be added to an overlapping aggregate.
Research & trendsA report combines an attributed $36m Illinois romance-fraud figure with a Chicago victim’s $70,000 loss and AI claims. The individual loss must not be added to an overlapping aggregate.
Research & trendsA report combines an attributed $36m Illinois romance-fraud figure with a Chicago victim’s $70,000 loss and AI claims. The individual loss must not be added to an overlapping aggregate.
Research & trendsA report combines an attributed $36m Illinois romance-fraud figure with a Chicago victim’s $70,000 loss and AI claims. The individual loss must not be added to an overlapping aggregate.
Research & trendsA report combines an attributed $36m Illinois romance-fraud figure with a Chicago victim’s $70,000 loss and AI claims. The individual loss must not be added to an overlapping aggregate.
Research & trendsA report combines an attributed $36m Illinois romance-fraud figure with a Chicago victim’s $70,000 loss and AI claims. The individual loss must not be added to an overlapping aggregate.
Research & trendsA report combines an attributed $36m Illinois romance-fraud figure with a Chicago victim’s $70,000 loss and AI claims. The individual loss must not be added to an overlapping aggregate.
Research & trendsA report combines an attributed $36m Illinois romance-fraud figure with a Chicago victim’s $70,000 loss and AI claims. The individual loss must not be added to an overlapping aggregate.
Research & trendsA report combines an attributed $36m Illinois romance-fraud figure with a Chicago victim’s $70,000 loss and AI claims. The individual loss must not be added to an overlapping aggregate.
Research & trendsA report combines an attributed $36m Illinois romance-fraud figure with a Chicago victim’s $70,000 loss and AI claims. The individual loss must not be added to an overlapping aggregate.
Research & trendsA report combines an attributed $36m Illinois romance-fraud figure with a Chicago victim’s $70,000 loss and AI claims. The individual loss must not be added to an overlapping aggregate.
Research & trendsHachinohe police report an Aomori woman in her fifties losing about ¥36m following social-video contact. Versions use rounded and more precise amounts; they are not separate losses.
Reported caseHachinohe police report a woman’s approximately ¥36m romance-fraud loss after marriage promises, investment proposals and multiple purported professional roles. The ¥4.23m transfer excerpt is a partial amount, not an additional independent loss. Multiple claimed identities do not prove separate cooperating offenders.
Reported case