Find reporting by topic, place or language. Open a record to see why it was included and what the available evidence supports.
Matching coverage over time
Relationship-based deception
The chart uses every search filter above and all matching records, across every results page. The percentage denominator is all included URLs in the same dates, before theme, language, country or text filters.
Distinct included URLs matching these filters in each observation month. Select a point to explore its records. On small screens, scroll the chart horizontally.
A URL counts once per month and can appear in several months or themes. Themes describe the current record assessment; months show URL observations, not when events or each claim first appeared. Warnings, allegations and reported experiences are all included when coded. Partial months, collection gaps and changes in sources affect both measures. A higher share does not establish a higher risk to victims.
Tokyo police re-arrested a married man alleged to have impersonated an airline pilot on a dating app and promised marriage to obtain over one million yen.
The title describes a woman losing 1.6 million to a purported US military doctor; the description aggregates more than ten romance reports and nearly five million. These are not unique-event counts.
A man in Aomori reportedly lost about 27,000 yen in cryptocurrency after a matching-app contact used video and an identity document to build affection and suggested investments for their shared future. Document presentation is not proof of identity theft.
A judge reportedly lost 52 lakh through Tinder to a person claiming a secret government role. A question about bail is not a confirmed court disposition.
An Istanbul arrest concerns an alleged American-businessman persona, marriage promise and 2.5 million loss to a Hong Kong dentist. The clipped account-freeze phrase is not sufficient for a recovery code.