Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC
Search the research collection
Find reporting by topic, place or language. Open a record to see why it was included and what the available evidence supports.
The chart uses every search filter above and all matching records, across every results page. The percentage denominator is all included URLs in the same dates, before theme, language, country or text filters.
Distinct included URLs matching these filters in each observation month. Select a point to explore its records. On small screens, scroll the chart horizontally.
A URL counts once per month and can appear in several months or themes. Themes describe the current record assessment; months show URL observations, not when events or each claim first appeared. Warnings, allegations and reported experiences are all included when coded. Partial months, collection gaps and changes in sources affect both measures. A higher share does not establish a higher risk to victims.
Each record represents a source web page, not a verified incident. Different URLs can describe the same event. About these records.
Hachinohe police report a woman’s ¥750,000 loss after a romantic contact suggested investment to fund living together. An initial ¥60,000 payment is part of the inducement, not recovery of the final reported loss.
Reported caseA named woman describes romance-investment scam workflows, specialized roles and pressure to obtain nude images. She says targets include financially secure adults over 35 and older people with limited online knowledge. This is an attributed account, not prevalence data or proof of coercion of every participant. The excerpt mentions inducing nude images but does not explicitly describe a threat to publish them, so sexual extortion is withheld.
Reported caseAomori police report a woman’s ¥9.29m crypto loss after a contact proposed saving for a shared home. The first profitable withdrawal is an inducement, not recovery of the final reported loss.
Reported caseFukui police investigate a woman’s ¥15.55m crypto loss following social-media contact. An initial ¥120,000 payment after a ¥100,000 investment is described as inducement, not recovery of the final loss.
Reported caseMutsu police report a woman’s ¥1.3m loss after TikTok and LINE contact and crypto-investment proposals. The excerpt describes cash transfers; it does not establish that she personally transferred cryptocurrency. An apparent account profit is not money recovered.
Reported caseA Bungo-Ono headline reports a man in his fifties losing ¥3.42m in a romance scam involving supposed resale of nine-eyed beads. The generic site description is not additional case evidence.
Reported caseGuardia di Finanza reports 23 people investigated and €900,000 laundered in a romantic-crypto network operating across five European jurisdictions. Investigation is not conviction; laundered funds are not automatically net losses.
Reported caseAn Italian report describes a romantic cryptocurrency-investment network, one arrest and €900,000 seized. Seizure is not equivalent to victim loss or returned funds.
Reported caseA Tochigi police interview recounts a 63-year-old man’s loss exceeding ¥30m after a matchmaking-app contact and a move to LINE. A claimed Japanese-Singaporean identity is not verified geography.
Reported caseAn Oita headline reports a man in his sixties losing ¥9.38m through a cryptocurrency-investment romance scam. Generic site text supplies no further case detail.
Reported caseMisato police report a man’s ¥860,000 crypto loss after a romantic contact offered interest. No recovery or conviction is established.
Reported caseUS authorities reportedly seized $61m USDT connected to romantic approaches and fake crypto sites. Seized money is not proven returned to victims.
Reported caseA Thane resident reports losing Rs34.10 lakh after a matrimonial-site contact promoted crypto investment and demanded more to withdraw. Headline and description disagree on age, 34 versus 30; preserve that discrepancy. The crypto platform does not establish that payments themselves were cryptocurrency transfers.
Reported caseAn Indian cybercrime advisory concerns matrimonial/dating-app investment deception and warning signs. The advice is not an effectiveness study.
Prevention & supportA Taoyuan woman reportedly lost NT$7m after dating-app contact and complained to police. The article also gives combined investment/dating-fraud rankings; those broader totals are not romance-only.
Reported caseA San Francisco retiree reportedly lost over $500,000 in an online romance-investment scam despite warnings and family reporting. The family’s action does not prove that police could have prevented the payment.
Reported caseHachinohe police report a woman’s approximately ¥36m romance-fraud loss after marriage promises, investment proposals and multiple purported professional roles. The ¥4.23m transfer excerpt is a partial amount, not an additional independent loss. Multiple claimed identities do not prove separate cooperating offenders.
Reported caseFukui police describe a man in his sixties losing about ¥4.76m in cryptocurrency after SNS contact and an introduced investment teacher. Advice is separate from the reported loss.
Reported caseState officials warn about false romantic profiles and emotional trust used to promote investments. The warning is not an effectiveness study.
Prevention & supportAARP cites nearly one in ten people over fifty targeted by romantic approaches seeking money. Being targeted is not the same as losing money.
Research & trendsMichigan’s attorney general reissues advice about investment romance scams. Reissuing a warning is not a new incident.
Prevention & supportState officials warn about false romantic profiles and emotional trust used to promote investments. The warning is not an effectiveness study.
Prevention & supportVirginia’s SCC warns about romantic approaches promising lucrative investments. The guidance is not a measured intervention result.
Prevention & supportA consultant responds to an OCCRP investigation alleging a fake-prince romance and investment scheme affecting a Romanian businesswoman. The allegations are not adjudicated facts. Reported nationality alone does not establish victim residence.
Reported caseArabic commentary describes invented relationships leading to transfers or false investments. The excerpt does not establish prevalence or diagnosed psychological harm.
Commentary