心のスキマを狙う詐欺、インスタに注意 中高年層のマチアプ浸透 ロマンス詐欺も止まらず 知って守る暮らしの新常識
Contextual metadata coding; reported claims are not independently verified. Unassigned codes mean not reported in the available text, not absent in the event.
Prevention & supportData from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC
Search the research collection
Find reporting by topic, place or language. Open a record to see why it was included and what the available evidence supports.
The chart uses every search filter above and all matching records, across every results page. The percentage denominator is all included URLs in the same dates, before theme, language, country or text filters.
Distinct included URLs matching these filters in each observation month. Select a point to explore its records. On small screens, scroll the chart horizontally.
A URL counts once per month and can appear in several months or themes. Themes describe the current record assessment; months show URL observations, not when events or each claim first appeared. Warnings, allegations and reported experiences are all included when coded. Partial months, collection gaps and changes in sources affect both measures. A higher share does not establish a higher risk to victims.
Each record represents a source web page, not a verified incident. Different URLs can describe the same event. About these records.
Contextual metadata coding; reported claims are not independently verified. Unassigned codes mean not reported in the available text, not absent in the event.
Prevention & supportContextual metadata coding; reported claims are not independently verified. Unassigned codes mean not reported in the available text, not absent in the event. The harmed person is the owner of stolen photos; no financial loss is stated.
Reported caseContextual metadata coding; reported claims are not independently verified. Unassigned codes mean not reported in the available text, not absent in the event.
Reported caseContextual metadata coding; reported claims are not independently verified. Unassigned codes mean not reported in the available text, not absent in the event.
Reported caseContextual metadata coding; reported claims are not independently verified. Unassigned codes mean not reported in the available text, not absent in the event.
Reported caseContextual metadata coding; reported claims are not independently verified. Unassigned codes mean not reported in the available text, not absent in the event.
Reported caseContextual metadata coding; reported claims are not independently verified. Unassigned codes mean not reported in the available text, not absent in the event.
Reported caseContextual metadata coding; reported claims are not independently verified. Unassigned codes mean not reported in the available text, not absent in the event. Auction proceeds are not repayment to victims; code seizure only. No victim-loss total inferred.
Reported caseContextual metadata coding; reported claims are not independently verified. Unassigned codes mean not reported in the available text, not absent in the event.
Reported caseContextual metadata coding; reported claims are not independently verified. Unassigned codes mean not reported in the available text, not absent in the event. Auction proceeds are not repayment to victims; code seizure only. No victim-loss total inferred.
Reported caseContextual metadata coding; reported claims are not independently verified. Unassigned codes mean not reported in the available text, not absent in the event. Auction proceeds are not repayment to victims; code seizure only. No victim-loss total inferred.
Reported caseContextual metadata coding; reported claims are not independently verified. Unassigned codes mean not reported in the available text, not absent in the event. Promotional-looking blog and template account: topical inclusion does not verify a separate victim, platform accusation or recovery claim.
Reported caseContextual metadata coding; reported claims are not independently verified. Unassigned codes mean not reported in the available text, not absent in the event.
Reported caseContextual metadata coding; reported claims are not independently verified. Unassigned codes mean not reported in the available text, not absent in the event. Auction proceeds are not repayment to victims; code seizure only. No victim-loss total inferred.
Reported caseContextual metadata coding; reported claims are not independently verified. Unassigned codes mean not reported in the available text, not absent in the event.
Reported caseContextual metadata coding; reported claims are not independently verified. Unassigned codes mean not reported in the available text, not absent in the event.
Reported caseThe description explicitly explains romance-investment deception through a false successful-person persona, sustained chats and trust. General mechanism discussion in promotional-looking material; no distinct victim or actual loss verified.
Prevention & supportThe named legal scholar describes a 9.25-million-yen romance/investment scam initiated on Facebook; a lawyer describes secret-sharing and emotional manipulation. This is retrospective coverage, not necessarily a new event.
Reported casePolice report a man in Isesaki losing cryptocurrency worth 5.8 million yen through SNS romance fraud. Do not infer an investment pretext merely from the cryptocurrency loss.
Reported caseThe police-attributed complaint describes an online romantic relationship, an impersonated military officer and a MOP460,000 investment loss. Allegations are preserved as such; report relative May/June references without inventing exact occurrence dates. Geographic role left unknown: a publisher masthead, local-relative wording or US descriptor alone does not explicitly locate the victim.
Reported caseThe description explicitly explains romance-investment deception through a false successful-person persona, sustained chats and trust. General mechanism discussion in promotional-looking material; no distinct victim or actual loss verified.
Prevention & supportThe first-person description explicitly links a packaged romance and promised security with taking all assets. Promotional-looking allegation, not a verified event; no precise loss, jurisdiction or investment mechanism is inferred.
Reported caseThe description explicitly explains romance-investment deception through a false successful-person persona, sustained chats and trust. General mechanism discussion in promotional-looking material; no distinct victim or actual loss verified.
Prevention & supportThe description explicitly explains romance-investment deception through a false successful-person persona, sustained chats and trust. General mechanism discussion in promotional-looking material; no distinct victim or actual loss verified.
Prevention & supportPolice describe Telegram grooming, a completed 180,000 payment and a separate blocked 480,000 demand using a sexual-services pretext. The latter is attempted loss, not completed loss or sexual violence; toy-investment pretence does not establish theft from a business.
Reported case