'Mum sent them £140,000': How to spot the signs a loved one is being scammed
Daughter intervention described; warning separate from reported experience.
Reported caseData from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC
Search the research collection
Find reporting by topic, place or language. Open a record to see why it was included and what the available evidence supports.
The chart uses every search filter above and all matching records, across every results page. The percentage denominator is all included URLs in the same dates, before theme, language, country or text filters.
Distinct included URLs matching these filters in each observation month. Select a point to explore its records. On small screens, scroll the chart horizontally.
A URL counts once per month and can appear in several months or themes. Themes describe the current record assessment; months show URL observations, not when events or each claim first appeared. Warnings, allegations and reported experiences are all included when coded. Partial months, collection gaps and changes in sources affect both measures. A higher share does not establish a higher risk to victims.
Each record represents a source web page, not a verified incident. Different URLs can describe the same event. About these records.
Daughter intervention described; warning separate from reported experience.
Reported caseTwenty-seven transfers explicitly support continued payments; Aichi aggregate crypto-loss report.
Reported caseLawyer's general account, not case-specific observed harms; no tested causal multiplier inferred.
Research & trendsNorthern Ireland report counts and losses for2025; not unique events in collection week.
Research & trendsNorthern Ireland 2025 report totals; reports do not equal confirmed unique victims.
Research & trendsRoundup title attributes loss to AI boyfriend; unrelated lake and food stories do not supply harm evidence.
Related mentionPolice aggregate spans multiple fraud types; retain original Japanese numeric units without untested conversion or romance allocation.
Related mentionTravel reported; no inference of trafficking, migration offence or violence.
Reported caseMixed investment and romance cases; do not assign whole13.16m total to romance.
Reported caseSubject dissatisfied with Italian response; not independently established official misconduct.
Reported caseFake kidnapping extortion after romance loss; WITHHOLD coercion/confinement: kidnapping is a pretext. AI discussed generally, not established in this case summary.
Reported caseTwo scam types; crypto investment clause not confidently allocated to romance case, WITHHOLD mechanism.investment.
Reported caseSubject dissatisfaction, police registration/search; not proven negligence.
Reported caseTroisdorf46-year-old3000 loss; online contact alone not detailed mechanism.
Reported caseHospital/illness/kidnapping as pretexts; no medical diagnosis, real kidnapping or death finding.
Reported caseTroisdorf46-year-old3000 loss; online contact alone not detailed mechanism.
Reported caseFoundation-grant advance-fee attempt; invented foundation affiliation not a real provider action.
Reported caseDaughter intervention described; warning separate from reported experience.
Reported caseElectronic-money rights not necessarily crypto. Nurse occupation is not institutional harm.
Reported caseDaughter attributes deception to altered photos/video; independent AI verification absent.
Reported caseHelp from daughter; warning is general guidance, not another case outcome.
Reported caseKidnapping and impending death are scam pretexts, not verified physical harm.
Reported caseAttempted payment to a supposed rock star; bank intervention, not an actual 8500-euro loss.
Reported caseCONFLICT: title/description gender differs; no inferred identity resolution. Prior exposure to other scams is not repeat targeting by this actor.
Reported caseWITHHOLD harm.material/housing: possible condo loss, not established. No automatic cognitive/vulnerability inference from age90.
Reported case