杀猪盘用上了AI,骗局开始批量生产
Lawyer's general account, not case-specific observed harms; no tested causal multiplier inferred.
Research & trendsData from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC
Search the research collection
Find reporting by topic, place or language. Open a record to see why it was included and what the available evidence supports.
The chart uses every search filter above and all matching records, across every results page. The percentage denominator is all included URLs in the same dates, before theme, language, country or text filters.
Distinct included URLs matching these filters in each observation month. Select a point to explore its records. On small screens, scroll the chart horizontally.
A URL counts once per month and can appear in several months or themes. Themes describe the current record assessment; months show URL observations, not when events or each claim first appeared. Warnings, allegations and reported experiences are all included when coded. Partial months, collection gaps and changes in sources affect both measures. A higher share does not establish a higher risk to victims.
Each record represents a source web page, not a verified incident. Different URLs can describe the same event. About these records.
Lawyer's general account, not case-specific observed harms; no tested causal multiplier inferred.
Research & trendsRoundup title attributes loss to AI boyfriend; unrelated lake and food stories do not supply harm evidence.
Related mentionTravel reported; no inference of trafficking, migration offence or violence.
Reported caseMixed investment and romance cases; do not assign whole13.16m total to romance.
Reported caseSubject dissatisfied with Italian response; not independently established official misconduct.
Reported caseSubject dissatisfaction, police registration/search; not proven negligence.
Reported caseHospital/illness/kidnapping as pretexts; no medical diagnosis, real kidnapping or death finding.
Reported caseFoundation-grant advance-fee attempt; invented foundation affiliation not a real provider action.
Reported casePolice stopped target, not alleged scammer. No offender-arrest application; no attempted payment stated.
Reported caseSparse conflicting gender wording; identity impersonation only, no age-based vulnerability assumption.
Reported caseDaughter attributes deception to altered photos/video; independent AI verification absent.
Reported caseKidnapping and impending death are scam pretexts, not verified physical harm.
Reported caseAttempted payment to a supposed rock star; bank intervention, not an actual 8500-euro loss.
Reported caseCONFLICT: title/description gender differs; no inferred identity resolution. Prior exposure to other scams is not repeat targeting by this actor.
Reported caseAttempt refused; misuse of deceased relative's LINE account. WITHHOLD harm.financial: proposed investment alone does not establish a payment demand or loss.
Prevention & supportWidower and promised shared future; service invitation not demonstrated service uptake.
Reported caseResearchers describe fake profiles and apps; not measured harmed-person count.
Research & trendsTosu 3.7-million crypto loss; unrelated to Mihama mixed 3.7-million case.
Reported caseSpecific loss; broader intro about loneliness does not establish this subject's prior isolation.
Reported caseBintan/Lampung video-sex-chat extortion and alleged police-aide impersonation.
Reported caseRepeated bank transfers September 8-14; crypto investment proposition does not establish payment in crypto.
Reported caseKlagenfurt 92-year-old case; age alone not coded as dependence or cognitive impairment.
Reported caseGold investment preceded by promise of shared future; account introduction not evidence victim acted as mule.
Reported caseLong duration alone does not prove repeated payment requests.
Reported caseAllegation of simulated financial problems and family gold transfer; no automatic employer theft.
Reported case