Woman defrauded of ¥178 million in romance scam
Twenty-seven transfers explicitly support continued payments; Aichi aggregate crypto-loss report.
Reported caseData from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC
Search the research collection
Find reporting by topic, place or language. Open a record to see why it was included and what the available evidence supports.
The chart uses every search filter above and all matching records, across every results page. The percentage denominator is all included URLs in the same dates, before theme, language, country or text filters.
Distinct included URLs matching these filters in each observation month. Select a point to explore its records. On small screens, scroll the chart horizontally.
A URL counts once per month and can appear in several months or themes. Themes describe the current record assessment; months show URL observations, not when events or each claim first appeared. Warnings, allegations and reported experiences are all included when coded. Partial months, collection gaps and changes in sources affect both measures. A higher share does not establish a higher risk to victims.
Each record represents a source web page, not a verified incident. Different URLs can describe the same event. About these records.
Twenty-seven transfers explicitly support continued payments; Aichi aggregate crypto-loss report.
Reported caseLawyer's general account, not case-specific observed harms; no tested causal multiplier inferred.
Research & trendsProposed dating service, effectiveness is promoter claim. No victim identity data collected here.
CommentaryRoundup title attributes loss to AI boyfriend; unrelated lake and food stories do not supply harm evidence.
Related mentionMixed investment and romance cases; do not assign whole13.16m total to romance.
Reported caseHospital/illness/kidnapping as pretexts; no medical diagnosis, real kidnapping or death finding.
Reported caseGeneral protective discussion, not a particular experienced loss.
Research & trendsGift-card warning; no victim harm or crypto transfer inferred.
Prevention & supportElectronic-money rights not necessarily crypto. Nurse occupation is not institutional harm.
Reported casePolice stopped target, not alleged scammer. No offender-arrest application; no attempted payment stated.
Reported caseSparse conflicting gender wording; identity impersonation only, no age-based vulnerability assumption.
Reported caseDaughter attributes deception to altered photos/video; independent AI verification absent.
Reported caseKidnapping and impending death are scam pretexts, not verified physical harm.
Reported caseAttempt refused; misuse of deceased relative's LINE account. WITHHOLD harm.financial: proposed investment alone does not establish a payment demand or loss.
Prevention & supportYamaguchi nurse and electronic-money loss; no assumption employer funds were used.
Reported caseSurvey fear of scams is not post-romance-scam psychological harm. WITHHOLD harm.psychological; multiple scam types.
Related mentionResearchers describe fake profiles and apps; not measured harmed-person count.
Research & trendsGeneric AI-deepfake statement; no individual occurrence established.
Research & trendsTosu 3.7-million crypto loss; unrelated to Mihama mixed 3.7-million case.
Reported caseOizumi crypto loss; no explicit investment proposition.
Reported caseInterpol trend statement; co-listed investment and romance are not automatically combined in one case.
Research & trendsTsubata reported social-media romance loss.
Reported caseRepeated bank transfers September 8-14; crypto investment proposition does not establish payment in crypto.
Reported caseCrypto and cash losses distinguished; platform migration explicit.
Reported caseBank reporting trend, not incidence. No actual amount or mental-health consequence.
Research & trends