'Mum sent them £140,000': How to spot the signs a loved one is being scammed
Daughter intervention described; warning separate from reported experience.
Reported caseData from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC
Search the research collection
Find reporting by topic, place or language. Open a record to see why it was included and what the available evidence supports.
The chart uses every search filter above and all matching records, across every results page. The percentage denominator is all included URLs in the same dates, before theme, language, country or text filters.
Distinct included URLs matching these filters in each observation month. Select a point to explore its records. On small screens, scroll the chart horizontally.
A URL counts once per month and can appear in several months or themes. Themes describe the current record assessment; months show URL observations, not when events or each claim first appeared. Warnings, allegations and reported experiences are all included when coded. Partial months, collection gaps and changes in sources affect both measures. A higher share does not establish a higher risk to victims.
Each record represents a source web page, not a verified incident. Different URLs can describe the same event. About these records.
Daughter intervention described; warning separate from reported experience.
Reported caseBank staff prevented loss; appreciation is not an evaluated prevention effect.
Prevention & supportProposed dating service, effectiveness is promoter claim. No victim identity data collected here.
CommentaryNorthern Ireland report counts and losses for2025; not unique events in collection week.
Research & trendsProposed Safe Love app; no effectiveness inference.
CommentaryPreventive advice; potential disclosure is not a completed privacy breach.
Prevention & supportAuthor's opinion about severity is not a comparative effect estimate.
Prevention & supportNorthern Ireland 2025 report totals; reports do not equal confirmed unique victims.
Research & trendsProposed Safe Love app; no effectiveness inference.
CommentaryLegal guidance on evidence/reclaiming money; not actual recovery or court order.
Prevention & supportLegal guidance about possible recovery; WITHHOLD response.assets: advice does not establish actual return of funds.
Prevention & supportSubject dissatisfied with Italian response; not independently established official misconduct.
Reported caseFake kidnapping extortion after romance loss; WITHHOLD coercion/confinement: kidnapping is a pretext. AI discussed generally, not established in this case summary.
Reported caseSubject dissatisfaction, police registration/search; not proven negligence.
Reported caseTroisdorf46-year-old3000 loss; online contact alone not detailed mechanism.
Reported caseHospital/illness/kidnapping as pretexts; no medical diagnosis, real kidnapping or death finding.
Reported caseTroisdorf46-year-old3000 loss; online contact alone not detailed mechanism.
Reported caseFoundation-grant advance-fee attempt; invented foundation affiliation not a real provider action.
Reported caseGeneral protective discussion, not a particular experienced loss.
Research & trendsDaughter intervention described; warning separate from reported experience.
Reported caseGift-card warning; no victim harm or crypto transfer inferred.
Prevention & supportPolice stopped target, not alleged scammer. No offender-arrest application; no attempted payment stated.
Reported caseHelp from daughter; warning is general guidance, not another case outcome.
Reported caseWITHHOLD harm.material/housing: possible condo loss, not established. No automatic cognitive/vulnerability inference from age90.
Reported caseSurvey fear of scams is not post-romance-scam psychological harm. WITHHOLD harm.psychological; multiple scam types.
Related mention