Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

Reviewed story hypothesis

Kyoto woman's reported JPY194.8 million loss

A timeline of related coverage, with the reasoning and uncertainty kept visible.

← Back to your story results
These reports are grouped for research, not as proof of one verified event. A timeline follows when URLs were observed in GDELT, not when the underlying events happened. Earlier observations do not prove the reviewed wording existed then.
2 source URLs2 source hosts

Reviewed saved titles and descriptions identify the specific account, proceeding, operation or work named here. Repeated wording supports a coverage association, not independent confirmation.

Source hosts may belong to the same publisher or repeat syndicated material. Review scope and methods.

Coverage timeline

Ordered by first observation in the collected metadata. Open a record for its assessed themes, original-source link and direct connections.

First observed www.hokkoku.co.jp

富山で1億9478万円被害 ロマンス詐欺「金取引で利益」|社会|富山のニュース|富山新聞

Why it is grouped here: Reviewed saved titles and descriptions identify the specific account, proceeding, operation or work named here. Repeated wording supports a coverage association, not independent confirmation.

Use the headline loss; the description is too truncated to assign the victim to Kyoto. Police jurisdiction is explicitly named.

Membership evidence and limits

Contextual association with this story hypothesis. It does not assert that every other member is directly linked to this report. Direct pairwise links are shown separately on each record.

Reviewed record revision: a85fc54be6b3961ce168a3d414b86223ccbd1746accc32f94a8622f404ac3f1a

First observed www.47news.jp

富山で1億9478万円被害 ロマンス詐欺「金取引で利益」

Why it is grouped here: Reviewed saved titles and descriptions identify the specific account, proceeding, operation or work named here. Repeated wording supports a coverage association, not independent confirmation.

Victim location and reporting police jurisdiction are different. The amount is a reported loss, not a confirmed regional prevalence estimate.

Membership evidence and limits

Contextual association with this story hypothesis. It does not assert that every other member is directly linked to this report. Direct pairwise links are shown separately on each record.

Reviewed record revision: d93c6e43b83bedb5eabc4c859265be0f38752b00c4d6c8a0edca7f49019d511b

Read the story-grouping methods and limitations