Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

Reviewed story hypothesis

Shanghai interviews about five relationship-fraud experiences

A timeline of related coverage, with the reasoning and uncertainty kept visible.

← Back to your story results
These reports are grouped for research, not as proof of one verified event. A timeline follows when URLs were observed in GDELT, not when the underlying events happened. Earlier observations do not prove the reviewed wording existed then.
2 source URLs2 source hosts

Reviewed saved titles and descriptions identify the specific account, proceeding, operation or work named here. Repeated wording supports a coverage association, not independent confirmation. A multi-person feature is not one case.

Source hosts may belong to the same publisher or repeat syndicated material. Review scope and methods.

Coverage timeline

Ordered by first observation in the collected metadata. Open a record for its assessed themes, original-source link and direct connections.

First observed finance.sina.com.cn

预告丨对话情感杀猪盘当事人:我把他当救命稻草,他把我当摇钱树

Why it is grouped here: Reviewed saved titles and descriptions identify the specific account, proceeding, operation or work named here. Repeated wording supports a coverage association, not independent confirmation. A multi-person feature is not one case.

Interviews describe several emotional-investment scam experiences, including a reported 340,000 loss. Shanghai identifies interview activity, not every victim location.

Membership evidence and limits

Contextual association with this story hypothesis. It does not assert that every other member is directly linked to this report. Direct pairwise links are shown separately on each record.

Reviewed record revision: 507180e3d8d64d94e362cb906c727edea54c55c3681adbe3604a8d6da700b3c6

First observed www.bjnews.com.cn

预告丨对话情感杀猪盘当事人:我把他当救命稻草,他把我当摇钱树 — 新京报

Why it is grouped here: Reviewed saved titles and descriptions identify the specific account, proceeding, operation or work named here. Repeated wording supports a coverage association, not independent confirmation. A multi-person feature is not one case.

These titles describe emotional pig-butchering victim narratives; shared generic descriptions do not establish individual loss amounts.

Membership evidence and limits

Contextual association with this story hypothesis. It does not assert that every other member is directly linked to this report. Direct pairwise links are shown separately on each record.

Reviewed record revision: fe8bd33128f342dcf1c547e7856b1341329140990a149a3092fdc65879735b39

Read the story-grouping methods and limitations