Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

Reviewed story hypothesis

HKET aggregate losses and median-loss explainer copies

A timeline of related coverage, with the reasoning and uncertainty kept visible.

← Back to your story results
These reports are grouped for research, not as proof of one verified event. A timeline follows when URLs were observed in GDELT, not when the underlying events happened. Earlier observations do not prove the reviewed wording existed then.
3 source URLs1 source hosts

The three matching HKET statistical/explainer captions support same work, preserving their different current applications. Aggregate denominators, unspecified yuan/period and clipped investment conclusion are not normalized or completed.

Source hosts may belong to the same publisher or repeat syndicated material. Review scope and methods.

Coverage timeline

Ordered by first observation in the collected metadata. Open a record for its assessed themes, original-source link and direct connections.

First observed wealth.hket.com

6.4萬人曾墮「戀愛殺豬盤」 7成為男性 損失金額中位數1.6萬元 - 香港經濟日報 - 理財 - 個人增值

Why it is grouped here: The three matching HKET statistical/explainer captions support same work, preserving their different current applications. Aggregate denominators, unspecified yuan/period and clipped investment conclusion are not normalized or completed.

Own three exact copies report64000people,70percent male and a16000元 median loss, alongside an illustrative WhatsApp wrong-number-to-romance approach. Keep source-reported aggregate denominators, unspecified元currency, illustrative false-neighbour persona and platform warning distinct from an individually observed event. Description clips before the claimed wealth secret: do not complete it as investment or returns, infer country from publisher or resolve a calendar year.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
title
reason
Own three exact copies report64000people,70percent male and a16000元 median loss, alongside an illustrative WhatsApp wrong-number-to-romance approach. Keep source-reported aggregate denominators, unspecified元currency, illustrative false-neighbour persona and platform warning distinct from an individually observed event. Description clips before the claimed wealth secret: do not complete it as investment or returns, infer country from publisher or resolve a calendar year.
subject
own_reported_aggregate_targets
subject basis
own_generic_subject
reported outcome
source_denominators_median_and_unspecified_currency_not_independent_incidence
subject name literals
No listed value
is entire code dimension denial
false
subject label has no borrowed name
true
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
reported_loss
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
research_statistics
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
db38ff025fccbd7e28caa1979efaef2db6e45261ec2102cc5c5c5df83c4dace8
current source binding
input hash
11ff7507270be0669e3763531901bd0184c7d015e37ba92a60487c31c5249205
decision id
3799cf4f91966303fd8e2d453493aa8438a02d04bc23e8dd829eed8bceb415bf
document id
264b79783bca93739894ebedf89df3bcd6ffef20b58ca134d2c1cc35297159bf
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
847254f061050cffdb06872a13f3ab56887e7f980b268f8eac64ac7999ecd39a
finding evidence sha256
fc87e2939afd007310c25ce4093c9c7e3df9624714193c33b5fd3bddd0e6818d
enrichment payload sha256
b53aecf150d95dcd5aaea1427da65f7b7810cb9ad21fe66508c63af9e2f50ade
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/264b79783bca93739894ebedf89df3bcd6ffef20b58ca134d2c1cc35297159bf/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
101d98f2014281d505b76276a5693c2e7deb113c67e0f6b72f8816da080e9be5
Membership evidence and limits

Contextual association with this story hypothesis. It does not assert that every other member is directly linked to this report. Direct pairwise links are shown separately on each record.

Reviewed record revision: db38ff025fccbd7e28caa1979efaef2db6e45261ec2102cc5c5c5df83c4dace8

First observed wealth.hket.com

6.4萬人曾墮「戀愛殺豬盤」 7成為男性 損失金額中位數1.6萬元 - 香港經濟日報 - 理財 - 個人增值

Why it is grouped here: The three matching HKET statistical/explainer captions support same work, preserving their different current applications. Aggregate denominators, unspecified yuan/period and clipped investment conclusion are not normalized or completed.

Own three exact copies report64000people,70percent male and a16000元 median loss, alongside an illustrative WhatsApp wrong-number-to-romance approach. Keep source-reported aggregate denominators, unspecified元currency, illustrative false-neighbour persona and platform warning distinct from an individually observed event. Description clips before the claimed wealth secret: do not complete it as investment or returns, infer country from publisher or resolve a calendar year.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
title
reason
Own three exact copies report64000people,70percent male and a16000元 median loss, alongside an illustrative WhatsApp wrong-number-to-romance approach. Keep source-reported aggregate denominators, unspecified元currency, illustrative false-neighbour persona and platform warning distinct from an individually observed event. Description clips before the claimed wealth secret: do not complete it as investment or returns, infer country from publisher or resolve a calendar year.
subject
own_reported_aggregate_targets
subject basis
own_generic_subject
reported outcome
source_denominators_median_and_unspecified_currency_not_independent_incidence
subject name literals
No listed value
is entire code dimension denial
false
subject label has no borrowed name
true
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
reported_loss
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
research_statistics
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
0a26163fa5855ba79e7d239238e5134fd95025f24e2587a6f7d496048072a7a7
current source binding
input hash
1c6139c94742dac852fc4d59ce41d50395141b2eca4127800adb55af5f21bb9e
decision id
f03ffc3e8cde08adc4ccbd03766a3a1b924c8adf11482b5e79ee762415331bb4
document id
355a5ee8b5f00ce0935366e14294d94a983de5c3b0fd747b5fa2a1dcaec17c5f
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
f67adf217dc5a362b5b73bd925cdb48d2279e77c051c8a0ecb137dbcdf916751
finding evidence sha256
e144ed4e0e24b1babc0f365e29f7541d1a372a2dc1981eab3ad9421d6d2367dc
enrichment payload sha256
9806b56aa99cc937241681cf42630b1b610185dce76410a4144e541c392c5893
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/355a5ee8b5f00ce0935366e14294d94a983de5c3b0fd747b5fa2a1dcaec17c5f/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
c7ff5c0e0daa905cbf74f4fad8ebbd99b1e01c9de0432e9651691eb3b15a0763
Membership evidence and limits

Contextual association with this story hypothesis. It does not assert that every other member is directly linked to this report. Direct pairwise links are shown separately on each record.

Reviewed record revision: 0a26163fa5855ba79e7d239238e5134fd95025f24e2587a6f7d496048072a7a7

First observed wealth.hket.comLast observed 2024-07-08

6.4萬人曾墮「戀愛殺豬盤」 7成為男性 損失金額中位數1.6萬元 - 香港經濟日報 - 理財 - 個人增值

Why it is grouped here: The three matching HKET statistical/explainer captions support same work, preserving their different current applications. Aggregate denominators, unspecified yuan/period and clipped investment conclusion are not normalized or completed.

Own headline claims64000 people,70percent men and a16000-unit loss median, without currency/period/denominator source details. The description illustrates WhatsApp wrong-number intimacy; its wealth-secret tail is clipped before an investment mechanism. Separate aggregate loss from a general grooming example; gender composition is not clinical risk, measured targeting susceptibility, unique incidence or an event year.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
title
reason
Own headline claims64000 people,70percent men and a16000-unit loss median, without currency/period/denominator source details. The description illustrates WhatsApp wrong-number intimacy; its wealth-secret tail is clipped before an investment mechanism. Separate aggregate loss from a general grooming example; gender composition is not clinical risk, measured targeting susceptibility, unique incidence or an event year.
subject
own_reported_context
subject basis
own_generic_subject
reported outcome
own_source_scope_and_inference_limits_retained
subject name literals
No listed value
is entire code dimension denial
false
subject label has no borrowed name
true
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
reported_loss
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
research_statistics
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
707ce5fef765197723c15679a00a4f81ce44279b2c2990009b867910c2642f41
current source binding
input hash
e7b8ed16b734d7bd49a26f261fd3c29694f41d5d3ca8099725334d00793c1d0b
decision id
72bc1a4f74bd841a1d853e6890fab5dade0f852610c61ab51297dd96024f0284
document id
544350e481511eb335b36293ee6dc9159b9cb0019bf48735fe0fe33193c97446
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
08bc9423b4763f8cccfd5ea417736bd03e4a6fc8851210f9a9ce3de4ef1fc405
finding evidence sha256
d226bd42cbb8a4f8ca5f077ddfd3996aa9b6ea47b516d75cac33cf17a17dede5
enrichment payload sha256
b67737fe8fe3748381213e54b7955697e0976ff829abfca7361c852ae0548454
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/544350e481511eb335b36293ee6dc9159b9cb0019bf48735fe0fe33193c97446/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
7cb53d686722901a00ce161f782935d95adf57c9a549b358287e6e8f8a862b0a
Membership evidence and limits

Contextual association with this story hypothesis. It does not assert that every other member is directly linked to this report. Direct pairwise links are shown separately on each record.

Reviewed record revision: 707ce5fef765197723c15679a00a4f81ce44279b2c2990009b867910c2642f41

Read the story-grouping methods and limitations