Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

Reviewed story hypothesis

New Jersey safer online dating question reporting work

A timeline of related coverage, with the reasoning and uncertainty kept visible.

← Back to your story results
These reports are grouped for research, not as proof of one verified event. A timeline follows when URLs were observed in GDELT, not when the underlying events happened. Earlier observations do not prove the reviewed wording existed then.
4 source URLs4 source hosts

Three exact NJ-online-dating-safer title/Maybe-depends-where-you-live lead variants support bounded comparative media-work family. Source question not proven safer states/populationrisk/preventioneffect/actualclinicalorphysicalharm, no fullstudy/rate borrowed.

Source hosts may belong to the same publisher or repeat syndicated material. Review scope and methods.

Coverage timeline

Ordered by first observation in the collected metadata. Open a record for its assessed themes, original-source link and direct connections.

First observed nj1015.com

Why you’re safer using online dating in NJ than most other states

Why it is grouped here: Three exact NJ-online-dating-safer title/Maybe-depends-where-you-live lead variants support bounded comparative media-work family. Source question not proven safer states/populationrisk/preventioneffect/actualclinicalorphysicalharm, no fullstudy/rate borrowed.

Own NewJersey online-dating safety commentary names Romance scams and dating apps. General platform topic only; no individual paid loss, explicit fabricated persona, physical injury or reproducible ranking denominator. State safety framing not actual target country, clinicalrisk or evaluated prevention. No substantive warning action inferred beyond commentary.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
desc
reason
Own NewJersey online-dating safety commentary names Romance scams and dating apps. General platform topic only; no individual paid loss, explicit fabricated persona, physical injury or reproducible ranking denominator. State safety framing not actual target country, clinicalrisk or evaluated prevention. No substantive warning action inferred beyond commentary.
subject
Aug05_unit_9
reported outcome
own_source_limits
is entire code dimension denial
false
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
e88e0e96f4d7282d9a5e54c013a4c33383c1c401ab00d54f8b9bb646b4318a09
current source binding
input hash
9c1fd59b344799eea7aae6d93f65804f5b2d8b544e0eb4e4e1b109d8138ccb0b
decision id
417fe3d87b7351a27b33e2defd93c8838ae35876d96e0152dd7e7f452b224fdd
document id
45507989cedf083a8c6112aecbca70d869db4df229c492f63de4ae3092bbc413
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
82626b43522db9eb3c06b02075f904d27d6fda64152d22221d39c472e73e1e23
finding evidence sha256
43afc2418db901a30f89448fd5c1e9347c1cc0727cff5b863a8f3097cef0ff32
enrichment payload sha256
f6bad6e84c698fe28daa8570b1c9288d1e440989fbfd6fba13fdb1d8a497029a
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/45507989cedf083a8c6112aecbca70d869db4df229c492f63de4ae3092bbc413/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
a72f72d1b82d786d6b45f601d8574c40ea45fde79f991bb7e3390b28a5ef6962
Membership evidence and limits

Contextual association with this story hypothesis. It does not assert that every other member is directly linked to this report. Direct pairwise links are shown separately on each record.

Reviewed record revision: e88e0e96f4d7282d9a5e54c013a4c33383c1c401ab00d54f8b9bb646b4318a09

First observed catcountry1073.com

Why you’re safer using online dating in NJ than most other states

Why it is grouped here: Three exact NJ-online-dating-safer title/Maybe-depends-where-you-live lead variants support bounded comparative media-work family. Source question not proven safer states/populationrisk/preventioneffect/actualclinicalorphysicalharm, no fullstudy/rate borrowed.

Own NJ online-dating relative safety question involving Romance scams and danger; question not measured individual risk/physical injury/financial amount/prevention efficacy.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
desc
reason
Own NJ online-dating relative safety question involving Romance scams and danger; question not measured individual risk/physical injury/financial amount/prevention efficacy.
subject
Aug26_unit_0
reported outcome
own_source_limits
is entire code dimension denial
false
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
research_statistics
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
331ba85417f1194e017f3eec013d0fba09f6c5e297e5d91eb9abeca532d82dd8
current source binding
input hash
d6f779ef05d5259da77b92de3688d2785a3745d00f8e7482b2577e9da1291b16
decision id
7682a3253a47d19b94b3fcd8300225ecde46177f28dfedace1e5286398d29abe
document id
c577d0806efbac76b219556e20a39cbd87c0d64d52c71ce3b3ae603ee001f8ca
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
ae9bad6256855d19056c085923e97045957d5e497fbb9bf7acf3427988884e06
finding evidence sha256
ec6378f4d2de97012f775497a7a33d8a8f17a2c762a7a39681e7ff37da20d063
enrichment payload sha256
030cd82b4811f4558c23535dad73ceda62780484b3f464900b20f2285ea3c0bd
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/c577d0806efbac76b219556e20a39cbd87c0d64d52c71ce3b3ae603ee001f8ca/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
d4b991925518a7c563d5ee921e07e50c5118d65bbbe6dbb428ea207cc1fcd4db
Membership evidence and limits

Contextual association with this story hypothesis. It does not assert that every other member is directly linked to this report. Direct pairwise links are shown separately on each record.

Reviewed record revision: 331ba85417f1194e017f3eec013d0fba09f6c5e297e5d91eb9abeca532d82dd8

First observed sojo1049.com

Why you’re safer using online dating in NJ than most other states

Why it is grouped here: Three exact NJ-online-dating-safer title/Maybe-depends-where-you-live lead variants support bounded comparative media-work family. Source question not proven safer states/populationrisk/preventioneffect/actualclinicalorphysicalharm, no fullstudy/rate borrowed.

Own NJ online-dating relative safety question involving Romance scams and danger; question not measured individual risk/physical injury/financial amount/prevention efficacy.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
desc
reason
Own NJ online-dating relative safety question involving Romance scams and danger; question not measured individual risk/physical injury/financial amount/prevention efficacy.
subject
Aug26_unit_0
reported outcome
own_source_limits
is entire code dimension denial
false
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
research_statistics
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
9ab6e509539f2afc2d24f59f2944b7e4e74f85103d942540f4aade55ce8a6ee6
current source binding
input hash
03a95a291b1f40bc43a0254fc9fe1eb242b3d4f7e8b4b635ac34573e61f20487
decision id
693f1cb8250161ce5a16acdc42ea675b39f7e16e227010d3f3a26119382cd089
document id
9265534e72b390b595c82a78db88f6bcecbeae12770760136a896f2be43206fe
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
f949c9685c3537e65a7df16dd550accac30e16d66952d4680146fbfb07d4388e
finding evidence sha256
45710ded3c16eccf7f1c8cfa8cb64e2d8758a4abd5bda9abbd59bfea14fd8cc8
enrichment payload sha256
5028fdde394cec370ba651d965d234ad5d199fcd1da061525bb87fd8a6825bed
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/9265534e72b390b595c82a78db88f6bcecbeae12770760136a896f2be43206fe/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
4f87d616a1e2fb50615179a2e8465797f6a38a4550d08d328c6091f064c6aa35
Membership evidence and limits

Contextual association with this story hypothesis. It does not assert that every other member is directly linked to this report. Direct pairwise links are shown separately on each record.

Reviewed record revision: 9ab6e509539f2afc2d24f59f2944b7e4e74f85103d942540f4aade55ce8a6ee6

First observed wpst.com

Why you’re safer using online dating in NJ than most other states

Why it is grouped here: Three exact NJ-online-dating-safer title/Maybe-depends-where-you-live lead variants support bounded comparative media-work family. Source question not proven safer states/populationrisk/preventioneffect/actualclinicalorphysicalharm, no fullstudy/rate borrowed.

Own online-dating/romance-danger geographiccomparison. No measuredsafety/rate/individualharm/clinicalvulnerability, no fullstudy borrowed.

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
research_statistics
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
7989264eedf450b36f15244969d9ec50a00f4eeff365d36d9e125fa02668de12
current source binding
input hash
66aafbaefb55686cb9fdfa5bd7a7405ecdd48f0f255b216655f74cb56817508b
decision id
51665425085833a54864d007e679a7125c9fb51b2bad01b8e4f522670457d09d
document id
e4bf9855b0e2f237c3b45b3949c20e29706b60e0ca79c5f4a7b94fb6325d7294
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
2b2091abe11efa225d8dad6f978406cb638b1c18a1c1aae35cf2b04cc30d3777
finding evidence sha256
e8b279a2c201f630a6e9711cf38f7e0be346ff77e68bb80d34583c1a1e05c880
enrichment payload sha256
ea6cfa42a6bbf42a26a3f1da48c37fa61a7ec8902e5bbd7a1c4ab23c60ec0048
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/e4bf9855b0e2f237c3b45b3949c20e29706b60e0ca79c5f4a7b94fb6325d7294/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
f7452dc27633ad10692b0b51eaea8aa482d32bb1cd72f49177857cb0de21fc53
Membership evidence and limits

Contextual association with this story hypothesis. It does not assert that every other member is directly linked to this report. Direct pairwise links are shown separately on each record.

Reviewed record revision: 7989264eedf450b36f15244969d9ec50a00f4eeff365d36d9e125fa02668de12

Read the story-grouping methods and limitations