Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

Reviewed story hypothesis

Taichung2023 September raid and lawyer leak reporting work

A timeline of related coverage, with the reasoning and uncertainty kept visible.

← Back to your story results
These reports are grouped for research, not as proof of one verified event. A timeline follows when URLs were observed in GDELT, not when the underlying events happened. Earlier observations do not prove the reviewed wording existed then.
2 source URLs1 source hosts

Two own exact Taichungprosecutor2023September Romance-hub raid/attorney-information-leak headline-leads support reporting work. Explicit raidmonth distinct later undated attorney charge; no principalconviction/force/financialtarget-girlfriend/actualrefund inferred.

Source hosts may belong to the same publisher or repeat syndicated material. Review scope and methods.

Coverage timeline

Ordered by first observation in the collected metadata. Open a record for its assessed themes, original-source link and direct connections.

First observed www.epochtimes.com.tw

詐團掌握檢警偵辦內容 又一律師洩密遭起訴| 台灣大紀元

Why it is grouped here: Two own exact Taichungprosecutor2023September Romance-hub raid/attorney-information-leak headline-leads support reporting work. Explicit raidmonth distinct later undated attorney charge; no principalconviction/force/financialtarget-girlfriend/actualrefund inferred.

Own Taichung Romance hub investigation/lawyer charged with disclosing investigation material. Professional disclosure offence distinct principal Romance conviction, girlfriend-client not proved financial target/forced worker; no personal paid loss or actual refund inferred. Only own explicit2023September raid dated where present; other lastyear/April/thisyear not filled.

Procedural context

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific procedural contexts

field
title
reason
Own alleged disclosure offence, not principal Romance conviction or refund.
subject
Taichung_attorney
reported outcome
charge
is entire code dimension denial
false
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
desc
reason
Own Taichung Romance hub investigation/lawyer charged with disclosing investigation material. Professional disclosure offence distinct principal Romance conviction, girlfriend-client not proved financial target/forced worker; no personal paid loss or actual refund inferred. Only own explicit2023September raid dated where present; other lastyear/April/thisyear not filled.
subject
Sep02_unit_1
reported outcome
own_source_limits
is entire code dimension denial
false
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
investigation
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
charge
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
abf95b988a70d49d25e18c5d4a6a62d39752f4847c91c732cd227b75c50b6bfb
current source binding
input hash
ac3212e48a909f2feb88b28107b9415c49c0d650dd4aeed13d8dd147866f409e
decision id
670e1d90949b64f6a9a2fa61576c600a881679b8243eecfc2856a9863e85f742
document id
086c9be72376c0941bced0e2d26324d9e7adde33d4f7b9f46cabf08877e00d60
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
e231a847eb54cdbd44e4f457b8ad2e046657c2bea62f5e502adea74e45f65bfc
finding evidence sha256
4cb123b01929fd2c8876b2514d540cdbaf214dcbadadf9020f7d03ca43c295e7
enrichment payload sha256
019cc24acbcf76b3dcc07489dfdad9b92d24644d923a34e851f7cc94f9ce5041
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/086c9be72376c0941bced0e2d26324d9e7adde33d4f7b9f46cabf08877e00d60/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
c7814051e9e160e7fdc118cf4171436a9971baf21c0985f329f51fa26d1837b3
Investigation and operational response · investigation · completedJustice proceedings and outcomes · charge · completed
Membership evidence and limits

Contextual association with this story hypothesis. It does not assert that every other member is directly linked to this report. Direct pairwise links are shown separately on each record.

Reviewed record revision: abf95b988a70d49d25e18c5d4a6a62d39752f4847c91c732cd227b75c50b6bfb

First observed www.epochtimes.com.tw

台中詐團主嫌掌握檢警偵辦內容 又一律師洩密遭起訴| 台灣大紀元

Why it is grouped here: Two own exact Taichungprosecutor2023September Romance-hub raid/attorney-information-leak headline-leads support reporting work. Explicit raidmonth distinct later undated attorney charge; no principalconviction/force/financialtarget-girlfriend/actualrefund inferred.

Own Taichung Romance hub investigation/lawyer charged with disclosing investigation material. Professional disclosure offence distinct principal Romance conviction, girlfriend-client not proved financial target/forced worker; no personal paid loss or actual refund inferred. Only own explicit2023September raid dated where present; other lastyear/April/thisyear not filled.

Procedural context

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific procedural contexts

field
title
reason
Own alleged disclosure offence, not principal Romance conviction or refund.
subject
Taichung_attorney
reported outcome
charge
is entire code dimension denial
false
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
desc
reason
Own Taichung Romance hub investigation/lawyer charged with disclosing investigation material. Professional disclosure offence distinct principal Romance conviction, girlfriend-client not proved financial target/forced worker; no personal paid loss or actual refund inferred. Only own explicit2023September raid dated where present; other lastyear/April/thisyear not filled.
subject
Sep02_unit_0
reported outcome
own_source_limits
is entire code dimension denial
false
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
investigation
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
charge
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
3a8575db140ea285f2e1bb111247fb2b72c857243867d5764359bf59dcc82db5
current source binding
input hash
6ddd32a613e03fded769ab54e69ab64ad1079d3e36e0e2fa39c444749991047d
decision id
a6e18cb8a86aac632a5cede66a63faf6000d871e9898410277e15c6e10b3b5b8
document id
7fb2324f85c9a80badf0dd9d0dd460d02a7ff315c5961b345714cfb3deb0ed97
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
b5a063fe887bd5a87c715a5b88206e7758049521a1a1af0897ae80dd151583f3
finding evidence sha256
a2f801251a751ac66e120049be8f94b311931c91f179dbf778294f7f7dc332a8
enrichment payload sha256
67c78a9773c13478c039f0087b18cdbbcd33eb0dd559d03e9ace21147e04ffe8
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/7fb2324f85c9a80badf0dd9d0dd460d02a7ff315c5961b345714cfb3deb0ed97/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
684bc397ed031d56670db193167bc07810ed8459b4c8c560a0b3f41afe1adfca
Investigation and operational response · investigation · completedJustice proceedings and outcomes · charge · completed
Membership evidence and limits

Contextual association with this story hypothesis. It does not assert that every other member is directly linked to this report. Direct pairwise links are shown separately on each record.

Reviewed record revision: 3a8575db140ea285f2e1bb111247fb2b72c857243867d5764359bf59dcc82db5

Read the story-grouping methods and limitations