Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

Reviewed story hypothesis

Matsue convenience-store repeat interception account

A timeline of related coverage, with the reasoning and uncertainty kept visible.

← Back to your story results
These reports are grouped for research, not as proof of one verified event. A timeline follows when URLs were observed in GDELT, not when the underlying events happened. Earlier observations do not prove the reviewed wording existed then.
2 source URLs2 source hosts

Same store/39-year-oldemployeeNishimura and exactheadline support same reportedintervention work. Previous twice-stoppedman doesnotestablish sameperpetrator or different independent incidents. Employeeagenottargetage; no calendar year inferred forJune14.

Source hosts may belong to the same publisher or repeat syndicated material. Review scope and methods.

Coverage timeline

Ordered by first observation in the collected metadata. Open a record for its assessed themes, original-source link and direct connections.

First observed www.sanin-chuo.co.jp

ファミマ山内店長、「匠」のチームワークで詐欺防ぐ 過去2度防いだ男性がまた…情報共有で女性店員に感謝状 | 山陰中央新報デジタル

Why it is grouped here: Same store/39-year-oldemployeeNishimura and exactheadline support same reportedintervention work. Previous twice-stoppedman doesnotestablish sameperpetrator or different independent incidents. Employeeagenottargetage; no calendar year inferred forJune14.

Matsue convenience-store employee39 Nishimura received police thanks for preventing romance fraud through staff information sharing. Headline describes previous two stops involving a returning man; these are repeated interception attempts, not two confirmed different perpetrator incidents. June14time has no year; employee age is not target age.

Protection or recovery of assets · intercept · completed
Membership evidence and limits

Contextual association with this story hypothesis. It does not assert that every other member is directly linked to this report. Direct pairwise links are shown separately on each record.

Reviewed record revision: 44a2a4a4c8fde579a97057d3fbbb4074952d9d861bbea31d3899412a9dc31cd2

First observed www.47news.jp

ファミマ山内店長、「匠」のチームワークで詐欺防ぐ 過去2度防いだ男性がまた…情報共有で女性店員に感謝状

Why it is grouped here: Same store/39-year-oldemployeeNishimura and exactheadline support same reportedintervention work. Previous twice-stoppedman doesnotestablish sameperpetrator or different independent incidents. Employeeagenottargetage; no calendar year inferred forJune14.

Matsue convenience-store employee39 Nishimura received police thanks for preventing romance fraud through staff information sharing. Headline describes previous two stops involving a returning man; these are repeated interception attempts, not two confirmed different perpetrator incidents. June14time has no year; employee age is not target age.

Protection or recovery of assets · intercept · completed
Membership evidence and limits

Contextual association with this story hypothesis. It does not assert that every other member is directly linked to this report. Direct pairwise links are shown separately on each record.

Reviewed record revision: c23d96c3c5ab18614b3e3f625a58f96e30c288a5d93c66653f0f582cdcaed4df

Read the story-grouping methods and limitations