Skip to main content
All research topics

Reporting and Help-Seeking

141 approved publications in the Library, including 1 dataset.

Each count opens the matching Library records. Classifications can overlap; they count publications, not unique studies, participants, or proven interventions. “Not classified” means that detail has no recognized label in the catalog.

Research Insight Published

Why romance scams can be hard to report

People targeted by romance scams may fear judgment or struggle to find an agency that will listen. Research explains these obstacles, but it does not establish how often all victims report or which reporting and support changes prevent further harm.

6 min read 13 sources cited in this explanation

Publication types

Format describes the record. It is not a quality score. Datasets are available for discovery, not Insight synthesis.

What do these research terms mean?
Preprint
A manuscript shared before formal peer review and publication. Check whether a later published version is available.
Dataset
A collection of data or examples for others to inspect or reuse. It can appear in Library search and topic mapping, but RSRC does not use dataset records as evidence in Research Insights.
Dissertation or thesis
Research submitted for an academic degree. This describes its format, not its reliability.
Journal article
An article published in a journal. This label alone does not establish peer review, study quality, or how well the findings apply elsewhere.

Definitions draw on DataCite resource types; Cochrane review methods; NLM: association and causation. RSRC’s dataset and classification rules are explained in our methodology.

Publication types among 141 approved publications
ClassificationPublications
Journal Article115
Book Chapter10
Proceedings Article8
Book2
Preprint1
Article1
Conference Paper1
Dissertation1
Not classified1
Dataset1

Research methods

A publication may appear in more than one row.

What do these research terms mean?
Qualitative research
Examines experiences, meanings, or processes, often through interviews or observations. It can explain how something happens without estimating how common it is.
Quantitative research
Uses numerical measurements to describe patterns or test relationships. A relationship between two measurements does not by itself show that one causes the other.
Systematic review
Uses a planned, documented method to find and assess research addressing a question. Its conclusions still depend on the included studies and what the search covered.
Meta-analysis
Statistically combines results from multiple studies. Combining studies does not remove weaknesses in their design or make unlike populations interchangeable.
Not classified
This record has no recognized label in this filter. It does not mean the publication used no method, or that no research exists.

Definitions draw on DataCite resource types; Cochrane review methods; NLM: association and causation. RSRC’s dataset and classification rules are explained in our methodology.

Research methods among 141 approved publications
ClassificationPublications
Interviews49
Literature Review43
Thematic Analysis42
Qualitative Research33
Qualitative Coding28
Sampling and Recruitment23
Surveys and Questionnaires22
Statistical Analysis18
Case Studies17
Conceptual and Theoretical Analysis14
Secondary Data Analysis14
Document and Case-File Analysis13
Content Analysis11
Legal Analysis11
Quantitative Research10
Regression Analysis9
Computational and Text Analysis7
Phenomenology6
Systematic Review6
Scoping Review6
Crime Script Analysis5
Ethnography and Observation5
Comparative Analysis5
Not classified5
Discourse and Conversation Analysis4
Mixed Methods4
Experiments3
Focus Groups1

Groups studied

A publication may appear in more than one row.

What do these research terms mean?
Groups studied
People or groups described in the research, where recorded. One publication can have several labels. Missing labels are a catalog limitation, not evidence that a group has never been studied.

Definitions draw on DataCite resource types; Cochrane review methods; NLM: association and causation. RSRC’s dataset and classification rules are explained in our methodology.

Groups studied among 141 approved publications
ClassificationPublications
Romance Scam Victims and Survivors99
Fraud and Scam Victims79
Online Dating Users38
Offenders and Scammers32
Women31
Older Adults27
Social Media and Online Platform Users25
Law-Enforcement Personnel15
Men13
General Public11
Family Members and Friends10
Not classified8
Young People8
Pig-Butchering Scam Victims7
LGBTQ+ People6
Potential Victims and Targets5
Students3
Service Providers and Clinicians3
People with Acquired Brain Injury3
Trafficked Scam Workers3
General Online Users3
Legal and Judicial Professionals1

Recorded geographic focus

Recorded study focus, not authors’ addresses. Unrecorded geography does not mean worldwide coverage.

Recorded geographic focus among 141 approved publications
ClassificationPublications
Australia31
Global25
United Kingdom20
United States19
Indonesia10
Malaysia7
China3
South Korea2
Japan2
Nigeria2
Poland2
Netherlands2
Italy2
Taiwan1
Bangladesh1
Ghana1
Germany1
Turkey1
Ireland1
Finland1
Spain1
Philippines1
Czech Republic1
Malta1
Iran1
Canada1
Pakistan1

Coverage reflects RSRC’s approved records and current classifications. Several publications may use the same underlying data. Source notices remain visible on publication records. Read the methodology before using these counts to plan research.