Skip to main content

Catfishing Phenomenon in the Perspective of Online Dating Services Users

Uyung Pramudiarja ; Dian Artika ; Dhea Hanna Prabawati (2023) — Jurnal Ilmiah LISKI (Lingkar Studi Komunikasi)

Citation activity

Total citations · Google Scholar
16
Average per calendar year
4.0

Count checked .

16 citations ÷ 4 calendar years (2023–2026). The first and last years may be partial. This is a lifetime average, not a year-by-year citation history.

Counts reflect Google Scholar’s coverage and do not measure research quality. Source, calculation and limitations

View Original Source (opens in a new tab)

DOI: 10.25124/liski.v9i1.5128 (opens in a new tab)

Type:   Journal Article
Country:   Indonesia
Tags:   Catfishing, Identity Deception, Indonesia, Offender Tactics, Online Dating, Profile Verification, Psychology, User Safety, Victim Experience
What do these research terms mean?
Preprint
A manuscript shared before formal peer review and publication. Check whether a later published version is available.
Dataset
A collection of data or examples for others to inspect or reuse. It can appear in Library search and topic mapping, but RSRC does not use dataset records as evidence in Research Insights.
Dissertation or thesis
Research submitted for an academic degree. This describes its format, not its reliability.
Journal article
An article published in a journal. This label alone does not establish peer review, study quality, or how well the findings apply elsewhere.
Qualitative research
Examines experiences, meanings, or processes, often through interviews or observations. It can explain how something happens without estimating how common it is.
Quantitative research
Uses numerical measurements to describe patterns or test relationships. A relationship between two measurements does not by itself show that one causes the other.
Systematic review
Uses a planned, documented method to find and assess research addressing a question. Its conclusions still depend on the included studies and what the search covered.
Meta-analysis
Statistically combines results from multiple studies. Combining studies does not remove weaknesses in their design or make unlike populations interchangeable.
Not classified
This record has no recognized label in this filter. It does not mean the publication used no method, or that no research exists.

Definitions draw on DataCite resource types; Cochrane review methods; NLM: association and causation. RSRC’s dataset and classification rules are explained in our methodology.

Citation tools
Download RIS Download BibTeX 


              
              

            

          

        


      

      

    

        
Transparency

        
Evidence and review status

        
This page contains AI-generated content. No human content review or subject-matter-expert review is recorded.

    


    

                    

                
Source basis

                

                    Downloaded PDF
                

            

                    

                
Source updates

                

                    No notice found at last check
                

            

                    

                
AI-generated page content

                

                    Yes
                

            

                    

                
Automated checks

                

                    Passed
                

            

                    

                
Administrative approval

                

                    Yes
                

            

                    

                
Human content review

                

                    Not recorded
                

            

                    

                
Subject-matter-expert review

                

                    Not recorded
                

            

            


    

        
            How this was prepared
        
        

                            

                    
Source basis

                    

                    
RSRC downloaded and privately stored a copy of the paper for internal analysis. The PDF is not offered to viewers from this page.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    PDF added to RSRC:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Source updates

                    

                    
No incoming update notice was found in the dated Crossref response. Coverage is incomplete, particularly for corrections and expressions of concern; this is not a guarantee that the source is valid or unchanged.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Last source-status attempt:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
AI-generated page content

                    

                    
AI-generated research notes displayed on this page: Synopsis, Identified gaps, Methods, Limitations, Future work. The paper itself is not described as AI-generated.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Document analysis recorded:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                            
  • 
                                    Synopsis generation recorded:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                            
  • 
                                    Page record updated:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Automated checks

                    

                    
The current, source-bound synopsis passed the recorded versioned publication checks.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Checks completed:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                            

                            
                                View passed checks (3)
                            
                            
    
                                                                    
  • Length, completeness, repetition, refusal, boilerplate, and active-markup screening
    • 
                                                                    
  • Numerical claims checked against the available source text
    • 
                                                                    
  • English-source lexical grounding check
    • 
                                                            

                        

                                        

                

                            

                    
Administrative approval

                    

                    
An authenticated administrator approved the bibliographic record for public Library display. This is not a review of every research claim.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Approved for public display:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Human content review

                    

                    
No human review is recorded for the AI-generated content displayed on this page.


                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Subject-matter-expert review

                    

                    
RSRC has not recorded review of this content by a subject-matter or methods expert.


                    
                                        

                

                    

    


    

        Review-state definitions

        Found a possible error?
        Request a correction.
    



    



              

        
                  

            
Synopsis

            
This study investigates how users of online dating services perceive the catfishing phenomenon, defined as identity misrepresentation or identity fraud within online dating. The authors aim to understand users’ views on authenticity, the motives behind presenting edited or enhanced identities, and the preventive steps people take to avoid being deceived. The research adopts a phenomenological, qualitative design and draws on in-depth interviews with four online dating users who vary in platform experience and usage intensity. Data are collected via platform observations and interviews, with informants ranging from less than a year to more than five years of experience and spanning different apps. The findings show that participants acknowledge a natural tendency to craft attractive impressions on dating platforms, yet they regard outright identity deception as an unacceptable form of dishonesty. The informants describe several anticipatory strategies to verify authenticity, including inviting video calls, profiling matches on other social media, and selectively revealing personal information. Some also trace a match’s identity across multiple sources to assess consistency, and they emphasize clarifying relationship goals to prevent being drawn into unsuitable dynamics. The discussion connects these observations to established theories of online identity and communication, noting that verification features (like profile blue ticks) may reduce risk but are not foolproof. The authors conclude that catfishing remains a risk but that informed sampling of platforms, cautious self-presentation, and progressive verification can mitigate potential harms. They acknowledge limitations of a small, regional sample and suggest broader studies to capture diverse socio-cultural contexts. The publication emphasizes practical implications for users and platform designers, while remaining cautious about extrapolating broader prevalence or definitive causal claims.

          

        
                  

            
Identified Gaps

            
The study provides limited evidence on severe catfishing outcomes because none of the four informants experienced material or emotional loss. It also lacks perspectives from people with diverse sociocultural backgrounds and from victims of more extreme catfishing.

          

        
                  

            
Methods

            
This descriptive qualitative phenomenological study used observations of online dating platforms and in-depth interviews with four users representing different experience levels and platform types. It examined user perceptions of catfishing, identity authenticity, and ways to identify and avoid catfishing.

          

        
                  

            
Limitations

            
The sample comprised only four informants, primarily based in Indonesia, and none reported catfishing that caused material or emotional losses. Findings therefore reflect user perceptions and preventive practices rather than direct experience of severe victimization or offender behavior.

          

        
                  

            
Future Work

            
Further research should recruit more informants from varied sociocultural backgrounds to produce a more diverse understanding of catfishing.

          

              

    
    

        
Related Research Insights

        

            See how this publication connects to RSRC's living evidence syntheses through current citations and research-topic mapping.