Skip to main content

Keeping It in “the Family”: How Gender Norms Shape U.S. Marriage Migration Politics

Gina Marie Longo (2018) — Gender & Society

Citation activity

Total citations · Google Scholar
Unavailable
Average per calendar year
Citation count unavailable

Counts reflect Google Scholar’s coverage and do not measure research quality. Source, calculation and limitations

View Original Source (opens in a new tab)

DOI: 10.1177/0891243218777201 (opens in a new tab)

Country:   United States
Tags:   Gender Norms, Immigration Forums, Marriage Fraud, Online Ethnography, Relationship Legitimacy, Sexual Double Standards, Transnational Marriage, United States Immigration
What do these research terms mean?
Preprint
A manuscript shared before formal peer review and publication. Check whether a later published version is available.
Dataset
A collection of data or examples for others to inspect or reuse. It can appear in Library search and topic mapping, but RSRC does not use dataset records as evidence in Research Insights.
Dissertation or thesis
Research submitted for an academic degree. This describes its format, not its reliability.
Journal article
An article published in a journal. This label alone does not establish peer review, study quality, or how well the findings apply elsewhere.
Qualitative research
Examines experiences, meanings, or processes, often through interviews or observations. It can explain how something happens without estimating how common it is.
Quantitative research
Uses numerical measurements to describe patterns or test relationships. A relationship between two measurements does not by itself show that one causes the other.
Systematic review
Uses a planned, documented method to find and assess research addressing a question. Its conclusions still depend on the included studies and what the search covered.
Meta-analysis
Statistically combines results from multiple studies. Combining studies does not remove weaknesses in their design or make unlike populations interchangeable.
Not classified
This record has no recognized label in this filter. It does not mean the publication used no method, or that no research exists.

Definitions draw on DataCite resource types; Cochrane review methods; NLM: association and causation. RSRC’s dataset and classification rules are explained in our methodology.

Citation tools
Download RIS Download BibTeX 


              
              

            

          

        


      

      

    

        
Transparency

        
Evidence and review status

        
This page contains AI-generated content. No human content review or subject-matter-expert review is recorded.

    


    

                    

                
Source basis

                

                    Downloaded PDF
                

            

                    

                
Source updates

                

                    No notice found at last check
                

            

                    

                
AI-generated page content

                

                    Yes
                

            

                    

                
Automated checks

                

                    Passed
                

            

                    

                
Administrative approval

                

                    Yes
                

            

                    

                
Human content review

                

                    Not recorded
                

            

                    

                
Subject-matter-expert review

                

                    Not recorded
                

            

            


    

        
            How this was prepared
        
        

                            

                    
Source basis

                    

                    
RSRC downloaded and privately stored a copy of the paper for internal analysis. The PDF is not offered to viewers from this page.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    PDF added to RSRC:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Source updates

                    

                    
No incoming update notice was found in the dated Crossref response. Coverage is incomplete, particularly for corrections and expressions of concern; this is not a guarantee that the source is valid or unchanged.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Last source-status attempt:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
AI-generated page content

                    

                    
AI-generated research notes displayed on this page: Synopsis, Identified gaps, Methods, Limitations, Future work. The paper itself is not described as AI-generated.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Document analysis recorded:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                            
  • 
                                    Synopsis generation recorded:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                            
  • 
                                    Page record updated:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Automated checks

                    

                    
The current, source-bound synopsis passed the recorded versioned publication checks.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Checks completed:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                            

                            
                                View passed checks (3)
                            
                            
    
                                                                    
  • Length, completeness, repetition, refusal, boilerplate, and active-markup screening
    • 
                                                                    
  • Numerical claims checked against the available source text
    • 
                                                                    
  • English-source lexical grounding check
    • 
                                                            

                        

                                        

                

                            

                    
Administrative approval

                    

                    
An authenticated administrator approved the bibliographic record for public Library display. This is not a review of every research claim.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Approved for public display:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Human content review

                    

                    
No human review is recorded for the AI-generated content displayed on this page.


                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Subject-matter-expert review

                    

                    
RSRC has not recorded review of this content by a subject-matter or methods expert.


                    
                                        

                

                    

    


    

        Review-state definitions

        Found a possible error?
        Request a correction.
    



    



              

        
                  

            
Synopsis

            
Gina Marie Longo’s study investigates how ordinary U.S. citizens cite and apply gendered ideas about love, family, and sexuality in the process of immigration petitions for spouses. The research asks how online discussions among petitioners discursively construct legitimacy criteria for marriages used to obtain green cards, and how these discussions reflect broader norms about gender, race, class, and citizenship. Using online ethnography and qualitative content analysis, Longo examines conversations on two regional forums within a large immigration discussion board, focusing on how participants debate what counts as a genuine relationship and what constitutes red flags of fraud. The analysis centers on themes such as short courtships, age differences, financial exchanges, and expressions of love, interpreting how gendered expectations shape perceptions of authenticity and risk. The study compares patterns across the Middle East/North Africa and Belarus/Russia/Ukraine subforums to reveal how participants’ evaluations differ by the gender and region of the prospective partners, and how these judgments are tied to broader ideas about the hegemonic family and national belonging. Principal findings indicate that petitioners deploy gendered standards to police relationships before any official evaluation, with women’s sexuality, fertility, and motherhood placed under greater scrutiny than men’s. Men are often framed as agents pursuing conventional family roles, while women are depicted as potential risks requiring verification of decency and fitness as citizens. The implications suggest that virtual spaces function as informal border policing, reinforcing intersectional hierarchies of gender, race, and class in transnational marriage and citizenship. The study highlights the need to understand how digital forums shape notions of belonging and power in immigration contexts.

          

        
                  

            
Identified Gaps

            
The paper identifies limited research on how virtual spaces shape gendered citizenship and border policing. It also notes that reasons Western women marry transnationally, and whether they present or conceal their cultural logics of desire in negotiations with officials, remain insufficiently understood.

          

        
                  

            
Methods

            
The study used two years of online ethnographic immersion and constructivist grounded theory/content analysis of a public U.S. immigration self-help forum. Python-assisted keyword searches identified “red flag” threads across 13 regional forums (2008–2014). The author purposively sampled 668 MENA and 230 BRU threads, then conducted in-depth qualitative analysis of 300 MENA and 200 BRU threads.

          

        
                  

            
Limitations

            
The sample was nonrandom and limited to self-selected forum users with immigration concerns. It likely overrepresents English speakers and people anticipating visa difficulties. Members’ demographic disclosures and claims about immigration-officer practice were unverifiable. LGBTQ+ people were only marginally represented and excluded from analysis; findings therefore cannot establish officials’ actual fraud determinations or generalize to all transnational couples.

          

        
                  

            
Future Work

            
Study how virtual spaces can reshape citizenship and national belonging more equitably. Further research should examine why Western women marry transnationally and how these relationships affect marriage-migration and citizenship processes.

          

              

    
    

        
Related Research Insights

        

            See how this publication connects to RSRC's living evidence syntheses through current citations and research-topic mapping.