Skip to main content

Living Evidence Synthesis

Grooming and Trust Development

Download PDF

Grooming and Trust Development in Relationship-Based Fraud: Evidence Synthesis

Published Updated Romance Scam Research Center
Publications
30
Evidence statements
125
Cited sources
30
Synthesis version
77

Transparency

Evidence and review status

This Living Evidence Synthesis is AI-generated and machine-checked. Administrative approval is separate from content review; no human content review or subject-matter-expert review is recorded.

Source basis
Downloaded PDFs
AI-generated page content
Yes
Automated checks
Passed
Administrative approval
Yes
Human content review
Not recorded
Subject-matter-expert review
Not recorded
How this was prepared
Source basis

This version used preserved evidence from 30 approved publications with downloaded source PDFs.

  • Source snapshot generated:
AI-generated page content

The executive summary and synthesis body were AI-generated from the preserved evidence snapshot.

  • Synthesis generated:
  • Public page updated:
Automated checks

17 recorded checks passed for the linked synthesis version. 2 nonblocking warnings were also recorded.

  • Checks completed:
Administrative approval

An authenticated administrator released this page publicly. Publication does not by itself mean the content received expert review.

  • Published by administrator:
Human content review

No separate human content-review decision is recorded for the linked synthesis. A synthesis approval record exists, but its provenance does not establish a separate human content review.

Subject-matter-expert review

RSRC has not recorded review of this content by a subject-matter or methods expert.

Review-state definitions
Found a possible error? Request a correction.

Across the reviewed evidence, grooming in relationship-based fraud is best characterized as a staged, interactional process in which offenders cultivate perceived intimacy and credibility through sustained, often asynchronous communication, staged disclosure, platform migration to private channels, and progressive financial escalation. Studies consistently report that declarations of affection and frequent contact are central grooming moves that precede requests for money, but the tempo of grooming varies widely across cases and subtypes. The corpus provides coherent descriptive patterns linking sustained affective persuasion to compliance and to isolation from third‑party scrutiny; however, authors also emphasize heterogeneous methods, limited dyadic interaction data, and other evidence gaps that constrain causal inference and population-level generalization. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]

Staged process and temporal variability

Multiple studies within the reviewed corpus describe grooming as a staged, interactional sequence in which early rapport-building and declarations of affection precede platform migration and later financial requests. Detailed qualitative analyses and conversation-corpus work document repeated patterns of sustained contact, affective expression, and stepwise escalation toward monetary extraction. [1] [3] [10]

Reported tempos vary: some investigations document monetary requests within days or a week, while other studies and case analyses record grooming lasting many months (six to twelve months or longer) before investment or larger extractions occur. The evidence therefore supports a staged model but also emphasizes tempo variability across subtypes and contexts. [5] [6] [7]

Persuasion mechanics and linguistic tactics

Linguistic and discourse analyses in the evidence identify recurrent persuasive devices used during grooming, including rapid declarations of love (love‑bombing), future-oriented promises, religious framing, and need-based appeals that reframe transfers as charitable or caregiving acts. Corpus and conversation analyses show modal and lexical patterns (for example frequent use of 'will' to conjure a shared future) and repeated affectionate lexemes that support these interpretations. [11] [12] [13] [14]

Multiple studies document how asynchronous communication enables crafted, persona-consistent replies and selective disclosure: the extra time afforded by text-based messaging allows offenders to produce polished messages, selectively present desirable traits, and manage impressions in ways that increase perceived intimacy. [2] [10] [1]

Secrecy, isolation, and facilitating compliance

Several sources document tactics aimed at isolating targets and discouraging third‑party disclosure: moving conversations to private platforms, reframing family or friends as unsympathetic or dangerous to the relationship, and explicit requests for secrecy. These isolation strategies reduce external scrutiny and are described as enabling larger or repeated transfers. [3] [4] [15]

Empirical and qualitative work shows scammers often move communication from dating apps to private messaging, build trust, and then present investment or emergency requests for cryptocurrency. Moving communication away from official dating sites into private channels increases victim isolation and reduces reporting or detection; it can also impede law-enforcement tracking and enable scammers to gather more personal information. [15] [4]

Financial escalation and operational subtypes

Empirical and qualitative studies consistently report progressive financial escalation: small gifts or test transfers are requested first and, when returned or accepted, are followed by larger requests framed as emergencies, investment opportunities, or joint projects. Offender-side experimental and interview work finds fraudsters adapt their presentations in response to reward signals and use follow-up after initial payments to draw victims further into schemes. [16] [5] [17] [18] [19]

The literature distinguishes at least two operational subtypes. Affection‑focused romance scams (AFRS) typically emphasize rapid declarations of love, romantic narratives, and direct early solicitations in some cases; relationship‑based investment scams (often labeled pig‑butchering or romance‑baiting) involve prolonged grooming that intentionally seeds and legitimizes investment opportunities (sometimes with staged small returns) before larger transfers. [1] [20] [21] [7] [22]

Victim experience, harms, and decision processes

Victim narratives and qualitative studies consistently report dual harms: material financial loss plus the traumatic loss of an experienced romantic relationship. Many victims retain emotional belief in the relationship after disclosure, which can enable continued payments or delayed recognition of fraud cues. [16] [23] [24]

Researchers describe how strong attachment, urgency framing, and reframing money requests as acts of care impair clear decision‑making. Several qualitative accounts link sustained affection and staged vulnerability to impulsive compliance and difficulty disengaging when feelings are invested in a perceived partner. [25] [26] [27]

Methodological patterns, limitations, and evidence gaps

Methodological approaches in the reviewed corpus are heterogeneous: qualitative interviews with victims, corpus linguistics of scam messages, police and court‑record case analyses, offender interviews, complaint-data studies, and a growing number of systematic and scoping reviews. This diversity yields rich descriptive detail on grooming processes but limits the ability to draw causal or population‑level inferences. [1] [14] [8] [4] [28]

Authors explicitly note key evidence gaps and limitations: few empirical studies examine real‑time interactions between scammers and victims on messaging platforms; some analyses rely on small or specialized samples (for example, one study selected 30 victim–scammer conversations for detailed linguistic analysis); and the reviewed literature is limited and mixed regarding deception detection, with studies indicating people generally still perform poorly at detecting online deception. [10] [8] [9]

Future directions supported by the evidence

Multiple authors recommend prioritized empirical work that directly examines actual offender–victim communications to identify specific linguistic indicators and temporal patterns that enable trust formation and exploitation. Evidence-based calls emphasize conversation- or discourse-level methods and digital-ethnographic approaches to capture prolonged grooming dynamics and offender adaptation. [12] [29]

The reviewed corpus highlights three findings supported by the sources: few empirical studies have examined interactions between scammers and victims on messaging platforms; victims reported emotional manipulation that impaired clear thinking and decision‑making; and at least one educational game’s main narrative depicts a romance scam in which the protagonist, Claire, is progressively drawn deeper into the fraud, with surrounding conversation threads included to maintain social realism. [8] [25] [30]

References

  1. Whitty, MT. (2013). Anatomy of the online dating romance scam DOI
  2. Annadorai, Kalaivani; Krish, Pramela; Shaari, Azianura Hani; Kamaluddin, Mohammad Rahim (2020). Mapping Computer Mediated Communication Theories and Persuasive Strategies in Analysing Online Dating Romance Scam DOI
  3. Faber, P. (2024). The Frames of Romance Scamming DOI
  4. Kassem, R.; Carter, E. (2023). Mapping romance fraud research – a systematic review DOI
  5. Kim, Hyo-shin; Seo, Jun-bae (2019). A Study on Romance Scam : The Current Situation and Effective Countermeasures DOI
  6. Wang, C. (2022). Online Dating Scam Victims Psychological Impact Analysis DOI
  7. Botha, Johannes George; Singh, Kreaan; Leenen, Louise (2025). Analysis of a Cryptocurrency Investment Scam: Pig Butchering DOI
  8. Bilz, A.; Shepherd, LA.; Johnson, GI. (2023). Tainted Love: a Systematic Literature Review of Online Romance Scam Research DOI
  9. Toma, Catalina L (2016). Developing online deception literacy while looking for love DOI
  10. Shaari, AH.; Kamaluddin, MR.; Paizi@Fauzi, WF.; Mohd, M. (2019). Online-Dating Romance Scam in Malaysia: An Analysis of Online Conversations between Scammers and Victims DOI
  11. Yosiandra, Syakira Yuniar; Sakariah, Dewi Saraswati (2024). Unveiling the Romance Scam Scheme: Psychological Manipulation and Its Impact on Victims DOI
  12. Lee, KF.; Chan, MY.; Mohamad Ali, A. (2022). Self and desired partner descriptions in the online romance scam: a linguistic analysis of scammer and general user profiles on online dating portals DOI
  13. Dickinson, T.; Wang, F. (2023). Neutralizations, Altercasting, and Online Romance Fraud Victimizations DOI
  14. Dreijers, G.; Rudziša, V. (2020). Devices of Textual Illusion: Victimization in Romance Scam E-Letters DOI
  15. Lim, A.; Choi, KS. (2025). Modus Operandi and Blockchain Analysis of Romance Scams: Cryptocurrency-Driven Victimization DOI
  16. Buchanan, T.; Whitty, MT. (2013). The online dating romance scam: causes and consequences of victimhood DOI
  17. Luong, Hai Thanh; Ngo, Hieu Minh (2024). Understanding the Nature of the Transnational Scam-Related Fraud: Challenges and Solutions from Vietnam’s Perspective DOI
  18. Dickinson, T.; Wang, F.; Maimon, D. (2023). What Money Can Do: Examining the Effects of Rewards on Online Romance Fraudsters’ Deceptive Strategies DOI
  19. Akartuna, Eray Arda; Yeung, Felix Sin Wai; Manning, Matthew; Bish, Alexandre (2025). Shifting routines and the industrialisation of scams: the impact of Covid-19 on deception crimes in Hong Kong DOI
  20. Wang, Fangzhou (2026). A scoping review of online romance scams: Conceptual construction and comparative analysis DOI
  21. Griffin, John M.; Mei, Kevin (2024). How Do Crypto Flows Finance Slavery? The Economics of Pig Butchering DOI
  22. Wang, F.; Zhou, X. (2022). Persuasive Schemes for Financial Exploitation in Online Romance Scam: An Anatomy on Sha Zhu Pan (杀猪盘) in China DOI
  23. Whitty, MT. (2017). Do You Love Me? Psychological Characteristics of Romance Scam Victims DOI
  24. Cross, Cassandra; Richards, Kelly; Smith, Russell (2016). The reporting experiences and support needs of victims of online fraud DOI
  25. Drew, Jacqueline M.; Webster, Julianne (2024). The victimology of online fraud: A focus on romance fraud victimisation DOI
  26. Carter, E. (2020). Distort, Extort, Deceive and Exploit: Exploring the Inner Workings of a Romance Fraud DOI
  27. Cross, C.; Dragiewicz, M.; Richards, K. (2018). Understanding Romance Fraud: Insights From Domestic Violence Research DOI
  28. Rovira, P. (2025). El timo del amor. Estafas eróticas realizadas por mujeres en Costa Rica entre 1970 y 1990 publicadas en el periódico La República DOI
  29. Gujarathi, Palak; Verma, Shankey; Nair, Vipin Vijay (2026). Pig Butchering Scams as Cyber-Enabled Financial Crime: A Scoping Review of Dimensions, Modus Operandi, and Victim-Offender Dynamics DOI
  30. Lea, Octavia; Shepherd, Lynsay A.; Szymkowiak, Andrea (2024). HeartGuard VR: Immersive Romance Scam Education DOI

This AI-assisted synthesis is based on reviewed evidence records. It may contain errors or omissions. Follow the publication and DOI links, consult the original works, and make your own judgment about the evidence.

Topic evidence hub

Explore the Grooming and Trust Development evidence base

This synthesis version cites 30 public RSRC records. The broader Library currently contains 200 approved publications mapped to this topic. Newly mapped publications can appear in the topic collection before they are incorporated into a later synthesis version.

Browse 200 topic publications
View 30 cited publication records from synthesis version 77
  1. Citation 1
    Anatomy of the online dating romance scam

    Whitty, MT. (2013) Security Journal

  2. Citation 2
    Mapping Computer Mediated Communication Theories and Persuasive Strategies in Analysing Online Dating Romance Scam

    Annadorai, Kalaivani; Krish, Pramela; Shaari, Azianura Hani; Kamaluddin, Mohammad Rahim (2020) Journal of Xidian University

  3. Citation 3
    The Frames of Romance Scamming

    Faber, P. (2024) Research in Language

  4. Citation 4
    Mapping romance fraud research – a systematic review

    Kassem, R.; Carter, E. (2023) Journal of Financial Crime

  5. Citation 5
    A Study on Romance Scam : The Current Situation and Effective Countermeasures

    Kim, Hyo-shin; Seo, Jun-bae (2019) The Police Science Journal

  6. Citation 6
    Online Dating Scam Victims Psychological Impact Analysis

    Wang, C. (2022) Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences

  7. Citation 7
    Analysis of a Cryptocurrency Investment Scam: Pig Butchering

    Botha, Johannes George; Singh, Kreaan; Leenen, Louise (2025) European Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security

  8. Citation 8
    Tainted Love: a Systematic Literature Review of Online Romance Scam Research

    Bilz, A.; Shepherd, LA.; Johnson, GI. (2023) Interacting with Computers

  9. Citation 9
    Developing online deception literacy while looking for love

    Toma, Catalina L (2016) Media, Culture & Society

  10. Citation 10
    Online-Dating Romance Scam in Malaysia: An Analysis of Online Conversations between Scammers and Victims

    Shaari, AH.; Kamaluddin, MR.; Paizi@Fauzi, WF.; Mohd, M. (2019) GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies

  11. Citation 11
    Unveiling the Romance Scam Scheme: Psychological Manipulation and Its Impact on Victims

    Yosiandra, Syakira Yuniar; Sakariah, Dewi Saraswati (2024) HUMANIKA

  12. Citation 12
  13. Citation 13
    Neutralizations, Altercasting, and Online Romance Fraud Victimizations

    Dickinson, T.; Wang, F. (2023) Deviant Behavior

  14. Citation 14
    Devices of Textual Illusion: Victimization in Romance Scam E-Letters

    Dreijers, G.; Rudziša, V. (2020) Research in Language

  15. Citation 15
    Modus Operandi and Blockchain Analysis of Romance Scams: Cryptocurrency-Driven Victimization

    Lim, A.; Choi, KS. (2025) International Journal of Cybersecurity Intelligence & Cybercrime

  16. Citation 16
    The online dating romance scam: causes and consequences of victimhood

    Buchanan, T.; Whitty, MT. (2013) Psychology, Crime & Law

  17. Citation 17
  18. Citation 18
  19. Citation 19
    Shifting routines and the industrialisation of scams: the impact of Covid-19 on deception crimes in Hong Kong

    Akartuna, Eray Arda; Yeung, Felix Sin Wai; Manning, Matthew; Bish, Alexandre (2025) Trends in Organized Crime

  20. Citation 20
  21. Citation 21
    How Do Crypto Flows Finance Slavery? The Economics of Pig Butchering

    Griffin, John M.; Mei, Kevin (2024) SSRN Electronic Journal

  22. Citation 22
  23. Citation 23
    Do You Love Me? Psychological Characteristics of Romance Scam Victims

    Whitty, MT. (2017) Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking

  24. Citation 24
    The reporting experiences and support needs of victims of online fraud

    Cross, Cassandra; Richards, Kelly; Smith, Russell (2016) Australian Institute of Criminology eBooks

  25. Citation 25
    The victimology of online fraud: A focus on romance fraud victimisation

    Drew, Jacqueline M.; Webster, Julianne (2024) Journal of Economic Criminology

  26. Citation 26
  27. Citation 27
    Understanding Romance Fraud: Insights From Domestic Violence Research

    Cross, C.; Dragiewicz, M.; Richards, K. (2018) The British Journal of Criminology

  28. Citation 28
  29. Citation 29
  30. Citation 30
    HeartGuard VR: Immersive Romance Scam Education

    Lea, Octavia; Shepherd, Lynsay A.; Szymkowiak, Andrea (2024) Lecture notes in computer science

Revision history

This history includes approved public synthesis versions. Drafts and unsuccessful generation attempts are not shown.

  1. Version 77

    Current public version

    Automated claim-level support repair round 2, correcting 1 passage from synthesis version 76.

  2. Version 76

    Automated claim-level support repair round 1, correcting 3 passages from synthesis version 75.

  3. Version 75

    Automated evidence-grounded revision attempt 1. Initial version: complete replacement synthesis created to conform with the independent audit. Protected verbatim passages required by the audit were reproduced exactly and attached to their specified evidence IDs. Broader claims were narrowed or removed where the audit identified unsupported elements; methodological limitations and future directions are stated only where the cited evidence explicitly indicates them. Evidence attachments were selec...

    • Evidence statements: 125 (+7)

    Sources added: Online-Dating Romance Scam in Malaysia: An Analysis of Online Conversations between Scammers and Victims.

    Sources removed: Does age matter? Examining seniors’ experiences of romance fraud.

View full revision history (77 versions)